# Markets, Messages, and the Sale

A market choice determines whom you can help and reach. A message makes that value understandable. A sale tests whether a particular buyer has a worthwhile reason to act. Confusing those jobs produces familiar mistakes: optimizing an advertisement before choosing a market, treating attention as profit, or pushing for agreement before establishing a useful outcome.

This article connects ten complete local Shortform one-page guides. It preserves the authors’ disagreements: Sharp’s broad category reach, Godin’s smallest viable audience, Ries and Trout’s focused position, and Dib’s direct-response plan make different bets. Schwartz and Miller explain messages; Rackham, Dixon and Adamson, Pink, and Roberge explain different parts of selling. Shortform comparisons are identified as such, and editorial corrections are not attributed to the book authors. Historical examples illustrate a mechanism unless evidence establishes more.

The route is market choice → brand growth and positioning → identity and sharing → a complete marketing plan → copy and StoryBrand → buyer conversations → a repeatable sales system. The nine-cell plan, seven-part BrandScript, SPIN sequence, and six-step Challenger teaching process each have one continuous main treatment.

<a id="theme-market-buyer"></a>

## Choose whom to serve before choosing the message

<a id="b-5be49eca43191212"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-64803924ccd7"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-5c051b2de94b"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-2a40a583cf02"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-65d01303cec7"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-23f3e2197b70"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-637c2ef1fec4"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5be49eca43191212:start -->
### Start with permission and a problem worth solving
Seth Godin’s *This Is Marketing* (2018) treats marketing as service: understand whom you want to help, make something that meets their needs, and build trust by keeping the promise. His target is interruption marketing that competes for attention by repeatedly pushing unwanted ads. More media and more choice make it easier for people to ignore those messages; being louder or larger cannot by itself create demand.

Permission marketing reaches people who have chosen to hear from the brand. Godin organizes his advice around creating value, serving a core audience, matching its worldview, encouraging word of mouth, and remaining consistent. His claim that interruption marketing has lost its power is a strategic position, not evidence that every traditional advertising channel has stopped working. The channel comparison below preserves that disagreement.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5be49eca43191212:end -->

<a id="b-01a1512e04f958dc"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-29f5c9d5e28a"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-01a1512e04f958dc:start -->
**The Experience Behind Godin’s Marketing Framework**

Seth Godin is an entrepreneur and marketing expert with over 30 years of industry experience. He has written more than 20 marketing books, including *All Marketers Are Liars*, *The Purple Cow*, and *Tribes*. He founded the online advertising and email-marketing company Yoyodyne before Yahoo acquired it in 1998 for a reported $30 million; he then became Yahoo’s Vice President of Direct Marketing. He has been featured in outlets such as *The New York Times*, *The Wall Street Journal*, and *Forbes*, was inducted into the Marketing Hall of Fame in 2018, and continues to be known as a leading voice in the marketing industry.

*References: [marketing expert with over 30 years of experience in the industry](https://www.sethgodin.com/) · [All Marketers Are Liars](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/all-marketers-are-liars) · [The Purple Cow](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/purple-cow) · [Tribes](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/tribes/1-page-summary)*

This biographical account is historical. [Godin’s 2003 interview](https://seths.blog/2003/06/)
<!-- atlas:block-content b-01a1512e04f958dc:end -->

<a id="b-13b65f3a441e1068"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-65cb5453739c"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-9904a7fb3d6e"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-5789d3b4eb1c"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-eec1ef8be20b"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-940a2aad6352"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-7889c4ddcc0b"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-335154c459dd"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-7e09d730ab6a"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-e2a49ffba71a"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-d27865b232ed"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-4900533add15"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-179c825c9d2b"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-4218abf3e5ff"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-9b90339b467b"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-3a5d67ed5173"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-89aea673d8c9"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-13b65f3a441e1068:start -->
**Value creation starts with customer needs, not products**

A shared principle across marketing frameworks is that effective work begins by understanding and meeting customer needs, though authors differ in how they advise aligning offerings with those needs.

Godin frames this as his first principle: create something of value. Many people make the mistake of building a product first and then trying to sell it, but effective marketers reverse the sequence — they identify a group of people with a problem, then build a solution to that problem.

Godin argues that people’s needs are often rooted in unmet emotional desires: customers do not buy products for the products themselves, but for the feelings those products provide. For example, no one strictly needs a nose hair trimmer or a new set of headphones, but people seek the self-confidence or social status those products can confer. He further notes that most people, regardless of age, gender, or geography, are driven by the same basic human needs — safety, security, belonging, respect — though these desires manifest differently for different people. For one person, security might mean a high-quality life insurance policy; for another, an in-home video surveillance system or a paid-off mortgage. By understanding these universal emotional needs, marketers can create products and services that meet people’s underlying desires.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-13b65f3a441e1068:end -->

<a id="b-755f9c546bcd96f2"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-b099a56f9f2a"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-f258242579f2"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-d5e5b7f16cfe"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-e69c1da20182"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-755f9c546bcd96f2:start -->
**Emotional needs are useful hypotheses, not a universal purchase meter**

Shortform connects Godin’s emotional-needs argument to Kahneman’s distinction between automatic, low-effort System 1 and more deliberate, attention-demanding System 2. That distinction explains why stated reasons need not capture every influence on a purchase. It does not measure a universal percentage of unconscious buying. The much-repeated “95%” appears in a 2003 HBS interview with Gerald Zaltman, but the accessible account supplies no reproducible denominator for treating it as an exact purchase law. [HBS interview](https://www.library.hbs.edu/working-knowledge/the-subconscious-mind-of-the-consumer-and-how-to-reach-it)

The need taxonomies also differ. Bryan Kramer’s *Human to Human* offers six: certainty, variety, significance, connection, growth, and contribution. Shortform’s account of Josh Kaufman’s *The Personal MBA* lists feeling good about oneself, connecting, growing and learning, safety, and avoiding effort. These are alternative interpretive frameworks, not one empirically settled list. Kaufman’s perspective also challenges a strict split between primal and shifting needs: wanting an ad-free dating app may reflect the deeper wish to avoid closing irritating ads while looking for love. Ask what a changing expectation does for the customer, rather than merely naming the trend.

The mere exposure effect supplies a further qualification to the idea that marketing cannot create desire: repeated exposure can make a product easier to process and less uncertain, increasing familiarity and sometimes liking. The source limits this effect to initially neutral or positive reactions; repeated ads are unlikely to make someone who dislikes comic books want to read them. Increased liking is not itself proof of purchase or profitable demand.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-755f9c546bcd96f2:end -->

<a id="b-49005dc275849d18"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-558ff113f670"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-a0e6943e95d8"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-3896f0ab05e9"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-0a3c823e4f0c"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-161df22466cb"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-37c8a83e2269"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-83f89fb39817"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-004fda6dda13"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-bdf40bc14db9"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-baf8b8142d5a"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-808300779380"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-6cf8f8516c52"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-0d9dca0f8dac"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-42a57eea9e29"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-49005dc275849d18:start -->
### Mass market versus niche targeting: a fundamental debate
Marketing thought is sharply divided on whether brands should compete for broad mass markets or focus on narrow target audiences.

In *How Brands Grow*, Byron Sharp presents evidence that most market divisions do not exist, drawing on customer overlap data to show that the vast majority of brands compete in mass markets. By measuring the share of buyers who purchase two competing brands within a given period, researchers can identify which brands are direct competitors. Sharp finds that “specialized” brands widely assumed to serve niche markets have the same level of buyer overlap with their niche peers as generic brands do, demonstrating that these supposedly niche players actually compete for the same broad customer base.

By contrast, both Dib and Godin argue that focused targeting delivers better results, especially for building meaningful customer connections. Dib frames this as an ROI question: concentrating marketing on the prospects most likely to buy generates higher returns on time, money, and effort than mass marketing, which he calls costly and hit-or-miss. He recommends focusing narrowly on one niche or market subset at a time; while a business can serve multiple niches, it should direct its marketing to a single ideal segment first — defined by customers the team enjoys working with, who value the offering, will pay a premium, and are numerous enough to be profitable — then expand to additional niches after dominating the first.

Godin frames the same core idea around focusing on your core audience, which he calls the “smallest viable market”: the smallest group of people sharing a common need or desire that can sustain a business or project. Focusing on this niche lets marketers develop deeper understanding of customer needs, build offerings that address those needs more effectively, stand out in a crowded marketplace, and cultivate a loyal customer base that drives long-term growth. Depending on the offering, this core audience might be specialty coffee enthusiasts or DIY beginners new to woodworking.

### Defining target audiences: exceptions, demographics, and values
While Sharp argues most market segments are illusory, he outlines two limited exceptions that can truly divide a market, and other authors offer complementary frameworks for defining target audiences.

Sharp’s first exception is significant functional differences: a product designed for a specific use case naturally has a concentrated customer base, as with a laptop charger built for British power outlets, which has far more buyers in the UK than in the US. His second exception is price ranges, though he notes these segment markets less sharply than commonly assumed. Average consumers buy the same product category across multiple quality and price points; upscale bistro patrons are on average wealthier than fast food customers, but lower-income people still dine at bistros for special occasions, meaning the bistro could increase profits by marketing to middle- and lower-income groups.

Dib recommends building niche audience profiles that include demographic characteristics such as age, gender, education, income, and geographic location, supplemented by deeper research and interviews with people in the target market to add nuance.

Godin, however, argues that core audiences should be defined by shared values — a shared “worldview” — rather than demographic traits. Shared values transcend demographic differences and drive more meaningful connections and engagement, forming a strong foundation for a loyal community. For instance, an eco-friendly clothing brand can target people who prioritize sustainability and environmental consciousness regardless of their age, gender, or location.

The overlap argument concerns who actually buys within a category; Dib’s ideal segment concerns where a small business spends scarce effort first; Godin’s worldview concerns what kind of change a community values. These objects differ, but the budget choice can still conflict. Test whether the proposed niche is a genuine functional/channel/price boundary or merely a demographic story, and whether a smaller audience can sustain the business before adopting either prescription.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-49005dc275849d18:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-9dd70bae251850fd--market:start -->
**Target Market Strategy: Niche Focus vs. Mass-Market Appeal**


An *Inc.* article outlines detailed, actionable steps for identifying your target market: analyze your existing customer base, your competition, your product or service, the most promising demographic group, and that group’s specific concerns, attitudes, and behaviors. [https://www.inc.com/guides/2010/06/defining-your-target-market.html](https://www.inc.com/guides/2010/06/defining-your-target-market.html)

The authors of *[The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing/)* reinforce the case for niche focus, noting that many businesses mistakenly assume appealing to a wider audience will grow their customer base. In reality, the path to expansion is to identify and focus on your strongest niche, because success in a niche expands the niche itself and spills over into broader markets. A classic example is Marlboro’s cigarette advertising: while competitors targeted both men and women, Marlboro focused exclusively on men with its iconic cowboy campaign, and ultimately led national sales among both genders.

Some marketing experts push back against the strategy of targeting the largest potential market need (as recommended by Schwartz). They argue that mass-market advertisements designed to appeal to everyone end up bland, predictable, and unmemorable, failing to resonate with anyone. Instead, focusing on the smallest viable market need helps businesses clearly define their target customer and understand how to appeal to them, resulting in sharper, more persuasive advertising that clearly communicates the product’s unique value. [https://seths.blog/2017/07/in-search-of-the-minimum-viable-audience/](https://seths.blog/2017/07/in-search-of-the-minimum-viable-audience/)
<!-- atlas:block-content b-9dd70bae251850fd--market:end -->

<a id="b-85469460e93b1d76"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-6b7bf7b53842"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-dcd6ebcea05f"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-85469460e93b1d76:start -->
**Audience Segmentation and Product Development Alignment**


Alexander Osterwalder and Yves Pigneur’s *[Business Model Generation](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/business-model-generation/)* offers complementary perspectives on both audience strategy and product development.

On audience segmentation, the book argues that businesses may have more than one core audience, referred to as “customer segments.” Customers fall into distinct segments if they require different products or services to meet their needs, different distribution channels to reach them, different types of customer relationships, or adjusted pricing structures to accommodate their circumstances.

On product development, the book recommends reversing the product-first analysis approach outlined by Schwartz: instead of building a product and then mapping its features to customer needs, businesses should define the target customer need before developing the product, and intentionally design features that serve that need. This approach also allows teams to develop marketing and sales strategies during the product development phase, accelerating the product’s launch into the market.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-85469460e93b1d76:end -->

<a id="b-88e46509af0b9a07"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-72fb1b64d24e"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-cdd44c338d5e"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-88e46509af0b9a07:start -->
**Values, Identity, and Demographic Myths in Purchasing**


Shortform cites a 2017 report saying the bottom 20% of families spent as much as 40% of their income on goods that report called “luxuries.” This is an archived report with a disputed classification, not a verified estimate of spending on prestige brands. The summary’s definition—purchases increase as income rises—does not distinguish luxury goods from normal goods, so that definition cannot support its conclusion. Shortform separately describes a theory that people facing greater income inequality may feel pressure to signal success through visible purchases. That is a possible identity mechanism, not a demonstrated explanation of the report’s 40% figure. The narrower market-selection point survives: a high price alone does not establish that every buyer is wealthy.

More broadly, understanding audience values is critical because values play a central role in how people express their identities: [customers seek products that align with and express who they are](https://cxl.com/blog/semiotics-marketing/). This is visible in the success of brands with loyal superfans, which have effectively tied their products to specific images or lifestyles. For example, Harley-Davidson fans associate the brand with individual freedom and an outlaw biker aesthetic, while Apple fans link it to creativity and innovation. Researchers have even found that consumer preferences in the US are divided along political lines, with [Republicans and Democrats opting for different brands of jeans](https://www.wsj.com/articles/are-your-jeans-red-or-blue-shopping-americas-partisan-divide-11574185777?mod=hp_lead_pos10).
<!-- atlas:block-content b-88e46509af0b9a07:end -->

<a id="b-b0f2aa109cbef647"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-89a63d7b0da9"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-b9dc3c50dc59"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-b0f2aa109cbef647:start -->
**Product Differentiation, Value Innovation, and Remarkability**


Since Sharp holds that significant functional differences can segment a market, he would likely agree that introducing unique functional differences to a product can create an entirely new niche market—even if this approach diverges from his broader advice to compete in mass markets. The authors of *[Blue Ocean Strategy](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/blue-ocean-strategy/)* call this approach “value innovation”: the pursuit of new advances that, in their view, allow businesses to offer customers greater value at a lower cost. These advances can stem from either cutting-edge research or [lateral thinking with existing technology](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/range/part-3-1#lateral-thinking-yields-new-ideas).

Godin expands on this idea in *[Purple Cow](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/purple-cow)*, arguing that creating something of value is not enough—marketers must create something truly remarkable and unique. Trying to market a slightly better version of an existing product is a losing battle; instead, brands need to create something new that stands out from the crowd the way a purple cow would stand out in a herd of regular cows. [https://www.shortform.com/app/book/purple-cow/chapter-1](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/purple-cow/chapter-1)

Shortform proposes Sharp’s agreement with this value-innovation argument; that is its comparison, not evidence that Sharp endorsed the entire Blue Ocean or Purple Cow strategy. A functional improvement can create demand without proving that every novelty or personality claim expands a category.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b0f2aa109cbef647:end -->

<a id="b-7b73f5582d70e123"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-f2fe59dfc00c"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-7b73f5582d70e123:start -->
**The Stubborn Minority and Why Niche Products Become Mass-Market**


> **Indifferent Majorities Buy Niche Products**
>
> One explanation for the high customer overlap between competing brands—even supposedly niche ones—is that products theoretically designed for narrow audiences often become mainstream. In *[Skin in the Game](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/skin-in-the-game)*, Nassim Nicholas Taleb [describes a phenomenon he calls the “Stubborn Minority.”](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/skin-in-the-game/chapter-4) This is the idea that society is *not* shaped by majority consensus, but instead by passionate small groups who impose their preferences on an indifferent majority.
>
> For example, in the US, [41% of packaged food is certified kosher](https://www.bbc.com/news/business-51107136) (satisfying the dietary restrictions of Jewish law) even though fewer than 2% of the US population practice the Jewish faith [(and only about a fifth of that small group keep kosher)](https://www.thespruceeats.com/do-all-jews-keep-kosher-2121845). This is because non-kosher eaters don’t care if their food is kosher or not and are willing to buy kosher food, allowing many brands to make their food kosher by default.
>
> For this reason, kosher brands compete in the mass market against *all* food brands, not just against other kosher brands. Kosher food isn’t a niche market because kosher brands share the same non-Jewish customers as their competitors.

The source’s 41% share of packaged food with kosher certification, under-2% Jewish population share, and roughly-one-fifth keeping-kosher share within that group describe different populations and classifications in an archived example. They illustrate how an inflexible minority’s requirements might shape a shared choice; they do not establish a universal market-share formula.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-7b73f5582d70e123:end -->

<a id="b-d2922603a831d3aa"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-6491d517dda5"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-d2922603a831d3aa:start -->
**The Ethics of Marketing: Empathy, Deception, and Storytelling**


Feminist author and cultural critic bell hooks argues in her 1999 book *[All About Love](https://www.harpercollins.com/products/all-about-love-bell-hooks?variant=32116522090530)* that rather than being a practice of empathy, marketing uses deception to perpetuate a constant state of desire and dissatisfaction that fuels the marketplace economy. Seth Godin does not dispute the role of lying in marketing: in *[All Marketers Are Liars](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/all-marketers-are-liars)*, he acknowledges that lying is a part of the job, but qualifies that good marketers only tell “fibs”—stories that may not be 100% factual or based in reality but bend the truth in a way that benefits both the business and the customer. [https://www.shortform.com/app/book/all-marketers-are-liars/1-page-summary#fibs](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/all-marketers-are-liars/1-page-summary#fibs)
<!-- atlas:block-content b-d2922603a831d3aa:end -->

<a id="theme-brand-memory"></a>

## Build a brand that category buyers can recall and buy

<a id="b-fde965f76e28dd35"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-35449f427e1a"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-8b2991553ef6"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-7bd2ea519489"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-aedf6c8e3ea2"></a>
<a id="b-dfacca1a4b95b140"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-843fe6c57b59"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-2f61a4e69493"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-dfacca1a4b95b140:start -->
### Brand growth: penetration, reach, and recognizability
Byron Sharp’s *How Brands Grow* (2010) challenges three common priorities: retaining a small loyal core, narrowly targeting a demographic, and persuading buyers that a brand is uniquely superior. Shortform condenses the book into three rules; these are its editorial grouping, not Sharp’s chapter structure.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-dfacca1a4b95b140:end -->

<!-- atlas:block-content b-fde965f76e28dd35:start -->
The useful version is to give acquisition sufficient priority, reach potential buyers of the category, and build recognizable memories of the brand. “Potential category buyers” includes light and occasional buyers as well as existing customers; it does not mean the entire human race. The Ehrenberg-Bass Institute explicitly retains customer service, product quality, and retention, and notes that advertising can support acquisition and retention together. Thus the archive’s “never market to existing customers” overstates the argument. Sharp’s case for broad reach still conflicts with Godin and Dib when they recommend concentrating scarce resources on a smaller audience. [Ehrenberg-Bass Institute](https://marketingscience.info/news-and-insights/effective-brand-growth-acquisition-or-retention)
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fde965f76e28dd35:end -->

<a id="b-7ec98a783e44cb62"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-b53933f154a0"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-7408a522fd0c"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-97068547410f"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-2ab0b49546ea"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-d13745cc50b8"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-7ec98a783e44cb62:start -->
**Why acquisition deserves a larger role**

The intuition behind retention-first marketing is straightforward: someone who has bought before appears easier to persuade. The archive illustrates it with a hypothetical one advertisement to prompt an existing buyer versus five to win a new one. This is an assumption about response, not measured acquisition cost. Sharp challenges the resulting habit of directing most resources at people already likely to buy. The relevant question is which spending changes behavior and expands the customer base, rather than which audience has the highest purchase rate before intervention.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-7ec98a783e44cb62:end -->

<a id="b-c11f68199d462158"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-c5a02df8afba"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-8df25985d27f"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-c1244a07df78"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-1c7b13afab95"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-98774bb1ef56"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-70c1c52a3f5c"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-b00a0c5c5f59"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-c11f68199d462158:start -->
### What the observed growth pattern does—and does not—show
Sharp’s argument rests on patterns observed across brands, industries, countries, and historical datasets. Larger or growing brands generally have many more buyers, while differences in purchase frequency and loyalty are smaller. Shortform calls this the “fixed pattern of brand growth.” It is evidence against expecting an exceptionally loyal small base to substitute indefinitely for a larger buyer base.

Keep the quantities separate. Penetration is the proportion of a defined category’s buyers who buy a brand during a specified period; a customer count needs that denominator to become a penetration rate. Market share is a share of category sales, not profit. Acquiring customers, losing fewer customers, and increasing purchase frequency can all affect sales. Observed cross-brand regularities do not prove that retention can never improve, that churn rates must be identical, or that every acquisition campaign makes money. Subscription markets and repertoire markets also require different loyalty measures. Use the pattern to challenge growth assumptions, then assess a particular intervention’s incremental revenue, costs, and timing. [Ehrenberg-Bass Institute](https://marketingscience.info/news-and-insights/effective-brand-growth-acquisition-or-retention)
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c11f68199d462158:end -->

<a id="b-2e9102a59c5c9d44"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-305549382474"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-2f6424b63df1"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-c82ca5ee1582"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-2e9102a59c5c9d44:start -->
**Reach the category without inventing demographic walls**

A targeting plan can exclude profitable light buyers when it assumes only one demographic ever needs the product. Sharp’s warning is to test that assumption against actual buying and overlap data. A broad category audience is not the same as an undifferentiated human population, and broad reach does not require identical copy for every occasion.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-2e9102a59c5c9d44:end -->

<a id="b-e4193700ccd80f03"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-c65acd64b218"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-4cf731efa0b2"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-1fde1cc2a652"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-2ba4af61d3cd"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-38144b62a5c6"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-c9a1aff26634"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-e4193700ccd80f03:start -->
**When a demographic profile becomes a false buying boundary**

Sharp challenges the assumption that buyers divide as neatly as marketers’ profiles suggest. A smoothie bar might imagine young, health-conscious customers while assigning families and less health-conscious people to the nearby ice-cream shop. The example asks whether those are actually separate buyers: the same person may choose either product on different occasions. Overlap undermines an assumed demographic wall, not every decision to focus a limited budget.

The local summary’s hypothetical healthy-frozen-meal company initially targets busy parents with disposable income and competes only with other healthy frozen meals. It may be overlooking occasional buyers outside that profile—even someone who buys only once a year—and substitutes such as instant meals, restaurants, and meal kits. Those are candidate buying occasions and alternatives to investigate, not proven substitutes merely because each supplies a meal. Calling the business a leader of a tiny niche may conceal room to grow; broader reach is worthwhile only if the additional buyers and contribution justify its cost. The example supports testing a larger category audience, not advertising to everyone or assuming a route to global leadership.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-e4193700ccd80f03:end -->

<a id="b-d7d01ebda185126d"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-928385373209"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-e5b253991fb2"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-80faba811ee4"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-d7d01ebda185126d:start -->
**Targeted Marketing: Sharp’s Critique and Counterarguments**


In a 2020 interview cited by Shortform, Sharp states that since *How Brands Grow* was published in 2010, the mainstream marketing world has fully embraced some of his ideas and resisted others. Large media companies like Facebook and Google were quick to echo his idea that brand growth comes from constantly attracting new customers—likely because they have the tools to reach mass audiences and can sell those advertising channels to other companies. However, Sharp claims companies still overvalue targeted marketing, failing to realize that the majority of their current buyers fall outside their target demographic.

Shortform raises two objections to a blanket rejection of targeting. Some products have a narrower use context: guitar straps matter mainly to guitar players, but purchasers also include gift buyers. Reaching people with no relevant use or buying occasion can waste money; “non-player” alone does not identify that group. Second, its historical account contrasts the 2010 publication with later Facebook and Google targeting tools. Those tools offered ways to select audiences more closely, not a guarantee that every impression matched the profile or that specialized advertising was cost-effective. Actual coverage, match quality, and acquisition economics still need observation.

On the other hand, advanced internet targeting may worsen the problems Sharp identifies: if brands only show ads to a narrow demographic, potential customers outside that group may be even less likely to hear about the brand than they were in the age of traditional mass marketing, preventing brands from expanding beyond their falsely assumed niche. For example, a leather guitar strap company targeting only 18- to 24-year-old male guitarists would miss sales to women, older or younger players, and people buying gifts for guitarists.

Shortform also contrasts Sharp’s rejection of demographic targeting with Seth Godin’s argument in *Purple Cow* that you should at least tailor your product to early adopters—consumers who actively seek out new things. Targeting early adopters is valuable because they are often the most willing to spend on innovative new products, and they promote products to other consumers through word of mouth. The majority of consumers are satisfied with what they have and are not looking for something new, so the kind of innovation that creates market leaders only appeals to a niche at first. Trying to please everyone dilutes the innovative qualities that attract early adopters; for example, if Netflix had tailored its service to the mainstream movie-viewing market by investing in brick-and-mortar rental stores, it might have lost to Blockbuster instead of winning over early streaming adopters.

*References: [the mainstream marketing world has fully embraced some of his ideas and resisted others](https://www.warc.com/newsandopinion/opinion/byron-sharp-on-the-legacy-of-how-brands-grow--and-why-he-disagrees-with-les-binet/3837) · [the Internet Age’s advances in targeted advertising](https://medium.com/swlh/a-brief-primer-on-targeted-advertising-24d705568047) · [Purple Cow](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/purple-cow) · [early adopters, or those on the lookout for something new](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/purple-cow/chapter-3) · [will dilute the qualities that make it innovative](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/purple-cow/chapter-5)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-d7d01ebda185126d:end -->

<a id="b-5922b6a08319a78d"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-0d6395e8790d"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-1043420ac42d"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-bda1889e9e2f"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5922b6a08319a78d:start -->
### Distinctive assets and differentiation answer different questions
Differentiation gives a buyer a reason to prefer an offering: a useful function, benefit, or position. Distinctiveness helps the buyer recognize whose offering it is through a name, color, logo, or other cue. Sharp emphasizes the second task because a persuasive reason cannot help a brand that never comes to mind or is not recognized. This is not a claim that functional differences never matter.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5922b6a08319a78d:end -->

<a id="b-51e740f1cee11749"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-01813b059db2"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-79b802b792bc"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-82437655765d"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-129bb8cc5c0f"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-e8661481441b"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-a1b31b6bbaa2"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-94bae638ab93"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-b47917b92468"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-51e740f1cee11749:start -->
**How consumers choose brands: presence beats evaluation**

Sharp argues that buyers often care less about fine-grained brand positioning than marketers assume. Customer surveys show that consumers typically perceive all brands in a category as roughly interchangeable; when differences are slight, consumers fail to see them at all. This is especially true of intangible brand features: only a small fraction of consumers ever think about a brand’s image or personality, and even those who describe a brand as more “trendy” or “wholesome” in surveys often change their opinions in later interviews. This limits a strategy that relies entirely on persuading buyers of subtle differences. Most of the time, consumers buy without deliberately comparing brands to determine which is best; humans have adapted to a brand-saturated world by filtering out the vast majority of branded messaging they encounter, so even a strong value proposition aimed at a target demographic will likely never get past the audience’s mental filter.

Sharp explains that when deciding which brand to buy, consumers ignore the vast majority of options and decide between the few that are immediately present—both physically in their surroundings and conceptually, meaning the first brands that come to mind when they think about a product. How often consumers think about a brand matters far more than what they think of it; even a brief moment of recognition makes a purchase vastly more likely than for brands they do not instantly recognize and therefore ignore entirely. The most effective way to market a brand, Sharp concludes, is to increase the likelihood that consumers will think about it.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-51e740f1cee11749:end -->

<a id="b-aa7fd680d7b7e707"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-3f76a51d637e"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-aa7fd680d7b7e707:start -->
**Mental availability is not simply availability bias**

Mental availability concerns whether a brand is easily recalled in a buying situation. Shortform connects it to availability bias, in which ease of recall distorts judgments of frequency or importance—for example, vivid reporting may make plane crashes feel more common than road crashes. The mechanisms share retrieval ease, but choosing a familiar brand is not automatically a mistaken probability judgment.

For low-stakes purchases, deliberately searching memory for a marginally better brand may not repay the effort. Shortform compares that cost with driving to another store for a slightly better product. Slowing down and using explicit evidence can check a biased judgment when the stakes justify it; the practical point for a brand is to be easy to recall and easy to find.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-aa7fd680d7b7e707:end -->

<a id="b-9b11a573a35883cb"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-75403860640b"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-46356c92e5d8"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-89b7ceb039b9"></a>
<a id="b-b5cbe5923745f543"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-5a845c95e741"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-afc110211a00"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-77df83242f90"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-9b11a573a35883cb:start -->
### Strategy 1: Advertise regularly to build and maintain brand memories
The first strategy Sharp recommends for increasing presence with memorable branding is to advertise regularly.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-9b11a573a35883cb:end -->
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b5cbe5923745f543:start -->
Advertising works by prompting consumers to create and maintain memories about your brand. If a consumer encounters your brand in the future—or anything that reminds them of your brand—they will remember your commercial and be more likely to consider purchasing. For example, even though a Chevrolet or Toyota television commercial is unlikely to convince someone to immediately go out and buy a car, the advertisement makes it more likely that they’ll think of the brand the next time they need to buy a car, months or even years in the future. Because advertisements work by triggering memories, Sharp asserts that the best advertisements grab the audience’s attention and engage them emotionally, making the ad more memorable. Memorable advertisements work well even if they’re not logically persuasive. Ads do, however, need to prominently connect to the brand in a memorable way. If the audience doesn’t register which brand the advertisement is promoting, they won’t remember the ad when the time comes to choose which brand to buy.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b5cbe5923745f543:end -->

<a id="b-c9bf9a5a091e1132"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-143506ec4f4d"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-33a8e37c2e44"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-e68ccec18698"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-c9bf9a5a091e1132:start -->
### Strategy 2: Create recognizable brand assets and keep them consistent
The second of Sharp’s three strategies is to create recognizable brand assets—symbols associated with the brand, such as a distinctive logo, color scheme, and memorable brand name. Whenever a potential customer recognizes any of these assets, for example by spotting them in a store, they recall positive memories of the brand (interesting advertisements, past purchases, and so on) and become more likely to buy. For this reason, Sharp argues it is critical to keep these assets consistent throughout the brand’s lifespan. Changing brand assets reduces the chance of immediate recognition, breaks the link to past experiences, and makes it more likely that the audience’s mental filter will cause them to ignore the brand entirely.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c9bf9a5a091e1132:end -->

<a id="b-12b8bcc46dd1647e"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-d417aa16da36"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-0fe95edbecfb"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-d0f0ccb76b35"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-12b8bcc46dd1647e:start -->
**Brand as cumulative experience and the role of consistent branding elements**

In *This Is Marketing*, Seth Godin defines a brand not as a logo, but as the sum of all customer experiences and expectations — a promise to deliver a specific level of quality, reliability, and value. While a brand encompasses more than visual elements, Godin acknowledges that symbols, fonts, and language still play a significant role in shaping customer perceptions and expectations, and in signaling the brand’s values, personality, and positioning. To build effective branding, he recommends using simple and consistent symbols, language, and colors. Godin cites Coca-Cola as an example: its classic red color, logo, familiar commercials, and slogans have made it a globally recognized brand embedded in popular culture, symbolizing happiness and shared experiences, with instant recognition and positive emotional associations.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-12b8bcc46dd1647e:end -->

<a id="b-dea90b262890279b"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-4a749d460425"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-3acf62bc07b1"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-34b59d6fec53"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-dea90b262890279b:start -->
### Strategy 3: Expand reach and visibility across channels
The third strategy for increasing how often consumers think about a brand is to expand reach and sell through as many channels as possible to boost visibility. Every time someone notices the product on a store shelf or in an internet search, it triggers memories of the brand and increases the chance of a purchase. When expanding into a new area, Sharp advises doing whatever it takes to make the brand easier to notice; for example, fast food restaurants use large branded signs to grab hungry drivers’ attention and persuade them to stop for lunch instead of going to a competitor.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-dea90b262890279b:end -->

<a id="b-70c02384f4f579e9"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-4e7b8c6a8571"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-bccf3510b4c6"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-70c02384f4f579e9:start -->
**Expanding Brand Reach Through Distribution**


Shortform points out that Sharp offers little specific advice on how to expand distribution. In *Blitzscaling*, Chris Yeh and Reid Hoffman advise finding ways to piggyback on existing distribution channels. For example, in its early days, PayPal expanded its reach and visibility by getting online vendors to add a “Pay with PayPal” button to their eBay listings. eBay had already built a large customer base interested in online purchases, so PayPal simply tapped into that existing market. Those early online customers were the people most likely to notice PayPal and remember to use it the next time they needed to transfer money online.

A Shortform editorial note clarifies that Sharp’s chapter on brand distinctiveness, referenced throughout the guide, is co-authored by Jenni Romaniuk; for simplicity, the guide continues to attribute these ideas solely to Sharp.

*References: [Blitzscaling](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/blitzscaling) · [finding ways to piggyback on existing distribution channels](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/blitzscaling/chapter-2#2-distribution)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-70c02384f4f579e9:end -->

<a id="b-5a0a1258720e2411"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-713605ed42cd"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5a0a1258720e2411:start -->
**Rebranding and recognizable assets**

Shortform contrasts the wish to keep a brand current with the cost of weakening familiar memory cues. It uses Gap and Tropicana as examples of substantial redesigns followed by customer backlash and reversals, and Google’s sequence of smaller logo changes over nearly two decades as an example of updating while retaining recognition. The comparison illustrates recognizable continuity versus disruption; it does not establish that the size of the visual change alone explains all customer reactions or business results. The decision is which assets people use to recognize the brand and what a proposed change preserves or removes.

*References: [it’s necessary to keep up with changing times and avoid appearing outdated](https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/322558) · [after rebrandings that were too extreme](https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-11517129) · [through a series of subtle tweaks](https://logo-timeline.fandom.com/wiki/Google)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5a0a1258720e2411:end -->

<a id="b-43ec0d9560a5baf5"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-b1d5e7dc704e"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-a2516e0da7ff"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-43ec0d9560a5baf5:start -->
**A sales spike is not the same as incremental profit**

Shortform contrasts long-term brand building with short-term activation, using limited-time discounts as its main example. The argument for combining them is that prior brand familiarity can make a purchase invitation more effective. The objection is that a discount can concentrate purchases that would have happened anyway: a first-week-of-April car sale might pull purchases forward from the rest of April while reducing margin.

That example preserves a useful test, but it does not establish that all activation or calls to action are unnecessary. Compare the campaign with the sales and contribution likely without it, including later periods; a spike alone cannot settle the question. Shortform attributes the discount chapter to John Daws and John Scriven and then folds it into Sharp’s argument; this attribution is from the local summary.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-43ec0d9560a5baf5:end -->

<a id="theme-positioning-category"></a>

## Read the 22 laws as a connected positioning strategy

<a id="b-71351d99bf505163"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-094a83965c8c"></a>
<a id="b-5d8c080128032f44"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-f3fb6f139d20"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-216aa4ab8840"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5d8c080128032f44:start -->
### Overview of the 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing
In their 1993 book *The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing*, Al Ries and Jack Trout challenge the common assumption that the highest-quality products and largest marketing budgets determine corporate success. While quality and ample resources help, they are not decisive. Drawing on more than 25 years of research into both well-known and obscure brands, Ries and Trout distill 22 universal principles that govern marketing success and failure. The six-theme outline below follows Shortform’s editorial grouping:
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5d8c080128032f44:end -->
<!-- atlas:block-content b-71351d99bf505163:start -->
1. **Convince consumers that you’re the only viable option**: Position your product as the top choice within your market.
2. **Focus your message**: Create a unique, targeted marketing message.
3. **Leverage your market position**: Learn how markets generally behave and how to use that insight to inform your marketing strategy.
4. **Be consistent**: Position your product as the best in its category and build your marketing around that product so customers know what to expect from your brand.
5. **Be strategic about your overall marketing plan**: Aside from the specifics of your marketing message, be strategic with your overarching tone and approach.
6. **Get on top and stay there**: Beyond the marketing arm of your business, ensure that your organization remains healthy for lasting success.

“Immutable” is the authors’ title, not an evidential status. The following 22 recommendations use Shortform’s regrouped numbering, preserved for navigation. Read their categorical wording as Ries and Trout’s strategic prescriptions. The cases illustrate the mechanisms they propose; a before-and-after sequence alone does not establish that positioning, line extension, or a slogan caused the sales change. Their concentration advice remains in genuine tension with Sharp’s broad category reach.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-71351d99bf505163:end -->

<a id="b-95b9c3bfcd003222"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-8fecdc63514c"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-b0b39390d417"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-ac4f3135fdbe"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-043a6b386309"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-bc1436614ddc"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-426f8fbf2d36"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-02de91ef59e4"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-1b9031f43163"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-2ba0c063bbff"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-905c7148830b"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-95b9c3bfcd003222:start -->
### Becoming the Default Top-of-Mind Brand
The first set of marketing laws focuses on establishing your product as consumers’ default top choice in its category. In every major product category, one brand immediately comes to mind for most people: Hershey’s for chocolate, for example, or Scotch tape for cellophane tape. These top-of-mind, default brands are the most successful.
- **Law #1: Be the First in Your Field**: People remember firsts, and companies that are first to enter their markets are typically more successful than later entrants — even if latecomers offer better products. First entrants also tend to remain market leaders over the long term, regardless of competitors’ product quality.
- **Law #3: Be the First Brand in Consumers’ Minds**: This law amends the first: being first in the marketplace only gives you a head start. What matters most is being the first brand consumers think of when they consider the product you sell.
- **Law #2: If You Can’t Be First, Create a New Category**: If another brand already leads your market, carve out a new category where you are first, without needing to entirely redesign your product — just identify a differentiating trait. For example, when Charles Schwab launched his brokerage firm, he avoided competing with existing full-service firms by creating the first *discount* brokerage.
- **Law #4: Perception Trumps Fact**: In the battle for prospective customers’ minds, you must fight not only to be *first* in mind but also *best* in mind. Contrary to popular belief, your most powerful marketing weapon is not the actual quality of your product, but the public’s perception of it. Simply put, perception is reality: no matter what research or performance tests show, your marketing will only succeed if consumers believe your product is the best. Build your marketing plan around the way people form perceptions by using some of the laws we’ll discuss later (such as laws #8 and #15). Marketing shapes people’s perceptions, and thus their realities.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-95b9c3bfcd003222:end -->

<a id="b-dee83e9e456ce8c8"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-bb6490f9514d"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-3514b9bc06ad"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-42ca17828125"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-600a7e7f93e5"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-bdaa4d2bcee2"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-8fb2dafee1a2"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-edb0055dce65"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-2c26dd70be17"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-bdc067cfea1f"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-98a9c306166f"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-ec9080f9b9dd"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-052da3b19c87"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-dee83e9e456ce8c8:start -->
### Focused Messaging and Contrast in Marketing and Sales
A core principle across both marketing and sales is that focused, distinct, contrast-rich framing makes an offering’s value far clearer to audiences.
In marketing, the second thematic group of laws emphasizes the power of a focused message: to get consumers to notice and remember your product, you need a unique, targeted message that sets you apart from competitors. Concise, audience-specific marketing gains the most traction.
- **Law #5: Pick One Word to Define Your Brand**: To build a strong, lasting perception in the public mind, center your entire marketing strategy on a single word that encapsulates your brand’s core message — such as “reliability,” “affordable,” or “service.” A successful strategy can create a universal, automatic association between your word and your product. For example, Mercedes built its success on the word “engineering,” emphasizing state-of-the-art features and innovation. When selecting your word, follow three guidelines:
  - **Make it simple.** Even for complex products or markets, a single simple word is more effective than multiple words; maintaining this narrow focus requires discipline.
  - **Be specific.** Choose a word that sets you apart from your competitors. Vague terms like “quality” cannot be tied to any single brand, because every company claims to offer quality.
  - **Use a loaded word.** Effective words create a halo effect, implying that your product also has other desirable traits. For example, marketing cars as “reliable” also suggests they are safe, long-lasting, and easy to maintain.
- **Law #6: Don’t Use Another Brand’s Word**: Your goal is to build an unshakable association between your word and your brand, which is impossible if a competitor already uses that word. Even with a massive marketing budget, you cannot co-opt a word tied to another brand — in fact, trying to do so will only strengthen your competitor’s message, by reinforcing the importance of a word already linked to their brand.
- **Law #7: Choose a Highly Valued Attribute**: When selecting your brand word, first identify the attribute customers value most in the product category. For example, in the toothpaste market, the top attribute is cavity-fighting ability. If another brand has already claimed the top attribute, move to the next-most-valuable, distinct attribute that appeals to a different desire — such as “whitening” or “fresh breath.” While “cavity-fighting” and “whitening” are not strict opposites, they target different consumer needs (medical vs. aesthetic). Trying to claim an attribute similar to your competitor’s will only leave you in their shadow.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-dee83e9e456ce8c8:end -->

<a id="b-8c0e9a1018898c2e"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-19bf8718ce13"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-bed93bda429a"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-dabb9baf4c0b"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-bb9ce0e98f02"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-fcfeb4009745"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-aaf6fc39096f"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-31cd81384687"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-12d10445e801"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-4835f7a73b1f"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-8c0e9a1018898c2e:start -->
### Leveraging Your Position in the Market Hierarchy
A third category of marketing laws explains how markets typically evolve and how to tailor your strategy to your brand’s position in the market hierarchy. Every company wants to be a market leader, but few can achieve that status; understanding your current position allows you to craft messages that resonate with consumers. Ries and Trout frame brand hierarchy as a ladder: the market leader occupies the top rung, and each lower rung holds the next-best-selling brand.
- **Law #8: Use a Message That Reflects Your Market Position**: If you are not the market leader, acknowledge your actual position openly in your advertising. Consumers already know where you stand on the ladder, and they will reject any message that clashes with that truth — disregarding your entire pitch. Avis demonstrated this effectively when it was trailing Hertz in the rental car market: its initial “Finest in rent-a-cars” campaign failed because it felt untrue, but the company swung from losses to profits after adopting the slogan, “Avis is only No. 2 in rent-a-cars. So why go with us? We try harder.” The campaign acknowledged its position while giving consumers a reason to choose it anyway.
- **Law #9: Every Market Becomes a Two-Rung Ladder**: When a product category is new, the ladder may have many rungs as competitors enter the fray. Over time, however, every market narrows to just two dominant brands, with all other competitors fighting for smaller remaining shares. This consolidation may take years or decades depending on the market’s pace of evolution, but securing one of the top two spots is critical to long-term business success.
- **Law #10: If You Can’t Be the Market Leader, Be the Opposite**: To claim the second rung on the ladder, turn the leader’s strengths into weaknesses by embodying the opposite of what the leader is known for, rather than trying to outperform them on their own terms. Consumers naturally either gravitate toward the most popular brand or resist it, so you can capture the share of the market seeking an alternative by highlighting how your product differs and why that difference makes it better. For example, while Coca-Cola held an unrivaled position as the classic, established cola, Pepsi positioned itself as the fresh, youth-focused alternative.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-8c0e9a1018898c2e:end -->

<a id="b-0df5fcad662f33be"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-70d352d2bc84"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-1deede30e19b"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-b67599cfc57b"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-797f6be545f1"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-4bfb6aae7d07"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-bf99b1631dcf"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-ce8d9a5461bc"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-9a04768d81b7"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-a06b9adf07d1"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-06bcdf409543"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-7a9a17477cdf"></a>
<a id="b-6a834692674e1940"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-f77ed4467183"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-0df5fcad662f33be:start -->
### Consistency and Long-Term Brand Focus
The fourth thematic group of laws centers on consistency: focusing your message is critical, but so is focusing your product offerings. If you concentrate on positioning your product as the best in its category and build your marketing around that product, consumers will know what to expect from your brand. By contrast, frequent changes to your offerings or strategy will leave customers uncertain, and they will turn to more familiar alternatives. Maintaining consistency requires discipline and sacrifice across three key areas (Law #14: Sacrifice for Success):
1. **Product line**: Expanding your product or service lineup does not increase profits — it dilutes customers’ association with your brand. Customers are more likely to choose a brand they know they can rely on for *one specific thing* over a brand that offers a scattered range of *everything*.
2. **Target market**: Marketers often assume that targeting a broader audience in ad campaigns will grow their customer base, but your *marketing target* is not the same as your *customer base*. Focus drives success: the most successful brands target a very specific demographic in their marketing, and that success leads to a far more diverse customer base. Targeted messages are more effective overall, which raises a brand’s market profile and attracts a larger pool of customers.
3. **Constant change**: Avoid repeatedly changing your marketing strategy to chase shifting market trends. Frequent changes will erode your focus and weaken the association you have built in the public’s mind. Instead, stick to the strategy that has been working for you.
Additional laws reinforce the importance of consistent, focused brand identity:
- **Law #13: Don’t Extend Your Brand to Other Categories**: When you have a successful product in one category, resist the urge to launch products in other categories under the same brand name — a practice called line extension. While it may seem like a logical way to build on existing success, it confuses customers and weakens your brand strength. The credibility you build in one market does not automatically transfer to other product categories; if you try to be everything to everyone, you will end up being nothing to anyone. For example, after 7-Up introduced new flavors and diet versions of its drink, its market share plummeted by more than half, from 5.7 percent to 2.5 percent.
- **Law #11: Use a Different Brand Name for Each Category**: As markets mature and the number of competitors shrinks, categories tend to split into more specific subcategories. For example, the single “computer” category eventually divided into mainframes, minicomputers, personal computers, laptops, and notebooks. If a market leader wants to enter one of these emerging subcategories, it must use a new brand name for that category. Customers already associate the existing brand name with a specific attribute (per Law #5), so a different brand name is needed to link to the appropriate attribute for the new category.
- **Law #12: Consider the Long Term**: As with many things in life, the short-term effects of a marketing action can be the opposite of its long-term effects. Smart marketers resist being swayed by short-term gains and carefully evaluate the long-term consequences of their decisions. For example, Miller High Life saw steady annual sales growth until it launched Miller Lite; five years after the light beer’s debut, Miller High Life sales had nearly tripled. But then sales declined steadily for the next 13 years, dropping below the levels seen before Miller Lite was launched.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-0df5fcad662f33be:end -->

<a id="b-60e737f251d3e1d9"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-1f1fbbc12876"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-3c42f609d679"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-60e737f251d3e1d9:start -->
**Positioning and brand extension remain a real disagreement**

Ries and Trout expect a focused association in memory to influence preference. Their dilution argument predicts that a luxury jewelry brand adding an affordable line may weaken its prestige and damage high-end demand. Sharp places more weight on broad buyer overlap and recognizability than on finely differentiated brand personalities.

Shortform imagines Sharp replying that the affordable line could do no harm because there is no luxury image to dilute. That is the summarizer’s conjecture, not a demonstrated result or a statement that Sharp made about this jewelry business. The decision remains empirical: would the new line reach additional buyers, cannibalize purchases, confuse recognition, or change what existing buyers value? Neither “all extensions dilute” nor “extensions cannot hurt” follows from the comparison.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-60e737f251d3e1d9:end -->

<a id="b-a76b29c1279b078d"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-1b54750687d1"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-8c701247269f"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-a76b29c1279b078d:start -->
### Turning product negatives into competitive positives

Law #15 of *The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing* advises turning negatives into positives. When competing brands or consumers point out something negative about your product, acknowledge it rather than deny it—denying a widely recognized fact will only erode your credibility. The goal is to show that the negative attribute implies other positive attributes. For example, Scope mouthwash positioned itself as “good-tasting” because it was common knowledge that rival Listerine tasted terrible. Listerine responded by embracing the negative with the tagline “The taste you hate twice a day,” implying that its strong taste signaled powerful germ-killing effectiveness and encouraging customers to use it despite the flavor because it was good for them.

Listerine’s unpleasant taste can be reframed as a sign of strength in the brand story. Taste itself is not evidence of medical effectiveness; the example illustrates repositioning a disadvantage as a perceived advantage.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-a76b29c1279b078d:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-b92369d473d2aed1--law16:start -->
Law #16 of *The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing* makes a parallel argument: the only way to gain ground on competitors is to focus on finding opportunities for bold, high-impact moves. Competitors may have only a single weak point, and you should direct all your energy toward exploiting it. Such opportunities are rare, but when they appear, you must capitalize on them. This requires top managers to stay on the front lines, stay aware of marketplace realities, and be deeply involved in the marketing process so they can seize opportunities as they arise.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b92369d473d2aed1--law16:end -->

<a id="b-cd92b1461b57c32f"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-e45aacbad043"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-9cf6c81e2f5d"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-d89c7169c731"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-cd92b1461b57c32f:start -->
### Short-term plans paired with long-term direction for unpredictable markets

Law #17 of *The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing* addresses the inherent unpredictability of the market. Marketing plans typically rest on assumptions about the future, but they risk backfiring when competitors act unexpectedly—for example, by launching a disruptive innovation. No amount of market monitoring or research can produce accurate predictions, because you cannot control or write your competitors’ plans. The recommended approach is to pair a short-term plan with a long-term direction: the short-term plan is built around a word or concept that differentiates your brand, while the long-term direction establishes a program that builds on that same word or concept. A shorter scope reduces the need for forecasting and lowers exposure to disruption.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-cd92b1461b57c32f:end -->

<a id="b-e15e91de96f2744e"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-99480c08e16c"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-e9376e92f720"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-e15e91de96f2744e:start -->
### Funding requirements for sustained market presence

Law #18 of *The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing* warns against underestimating funding needs: no matter how brilliant your idea, you need money to market it successfully. Marketing is about getting and keeping your product or service in consumers’ minds, and both steps cost money. It is a constant, expensive battle—even household names like Procter & Gamble and General Motors spend billions each year to stay top of mind.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-e15e91de96f2744e:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-5de4929f5b073883--law19:start -->
*The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing* frames the willingness to embrace failure as a prerequisite for this kind of bold progress. Law #19 states that failure is inevitable, and that business success requires expecting and embracing failure. Doing so makes you willing to take the bold risks necessary for big rewards, and it lets you learn from mistakes and improve continuously.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5de4929f5b073883--law19:end -->

<a id="b-13883566fb8ee23f"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-f7eed91be010"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-2a8f6b4b1995"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-13883566fb8ee23f:start -->
### Law #20 of *The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing*: Don’t believe hype
Law #20 of *The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing* is “Don’t Believe Hype.” Heavy media hype around a company or new product is usually a poor predictor of success. When companies are doing well, they do not need to manufacture excitement because it exists organically. By contrast, companies typically start holding press conferences and courting media outlets when they are struggling, or when they are taking a chance on a questionable new product. If a competing brand is receiving a lot of media hype, you should not base your decisions on the assumption that the competitor is on the rise.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-13883566fb8ee23f:end -->

<a id="b-e2e1eaa261cde702"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-eceea6b592ed"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-dca7928f6183"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-422633553ec9"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-7436f773f396"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-e2e1eaa261cde702:start -->
### Fads versus trends: why short-term hype can harm a business
It is critical to distinguish between fads and trends, because fads can hurt a business while trends can create long-term success, as stated in *The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing* Law #21.

- **Fads are short-term.** They hit like a wave, generate heavy hype, saturate the market, and fade as quickly as they rose.
- **Trends are long-term.** They are subtle — almost unnoticed — and can endure for years or decades.

Companies should be wary of investing in fads. Although fads can be profitable, their short lifespan often does more harm than good: by the time an organization has set up the necessary staff, manufacturing, and distribution, the fad is already over. If you are already selling a product that becomes a fad, the best response is to dampen the fad by limiting supply, which sustains demand. Ideally, you can dampen a fad so thoroughly that it converts into a trend.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-e2e1eaa261cde702:end -->

<a id="b-2d178e2a3877a601"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-6350008b244e"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-d6c7e0cd9522"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-6fd11b222feb"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-2d178e2a3877a601:start -->
### How success can erode leadership effectiveness

Law #22 of *The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing* warns that success itself can become a company’s downfall through three mechanisms. First, success tends to inflate executives’ egos, leading them to make decisions that harm the company. Second, success drives company growth, which increases demands on executives’ time; although larger companies have more resources for marketing, CEOs spend more time in corporate meetings and handling ancillary obligations, so they often delegate marketing decisions—even though the success of the strategy depends on top executive involvement. Third, as CEOs grow more distant from the front lines, subordinates become less likely to tell them hard truths, leaving CEOs out of touch with the issues that should shape their decisions.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-2d178e2a3877a601:end -->

<a id="theme-identity"></a>

## Identity, belonging, and the reasons people share

<a id="b-6637c06eceb3a92f"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-6bb567d39b10"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-946bba5f5db8"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-cba87d5f6827"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-57f76fdc1c57"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-ab5750ca237f"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-6148e276ebcc"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-b6b3d574d708"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-1cba0af93ae6"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-7995ebde88a7"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-6637c06eceb3a92f:start -->
### Core Logic of Story-Driven Marketing: Align With the Customer’s Self-View

The foundational principle of story-driven marketing is to align the narrative you tell with how your core audience sees themselves, so they immediately recognize that your product or service is meant for them. In *This Is Marketing*, Seth Godin frames this as Principle 3: Match Your Story to the Audience’s Point of View. He explains that all decisions — including purchasing decisions — are rooted in the stories people tell themselves about who they are: the internal refrain of “I am the kind of person who…” shops at the local co-op, uses coupons, or wears a luxury watch. Effective marketing therefore aligns the brand’s story with the self-story the audience already holds.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-6637c06eceb3a92f:end -->

<a id="b-ae4e35565407a3ce"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-793c1bdec147"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-871d24de6587"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-ae4e35565407a3ce:start -->
**Matching your story to the audience’s worldview**


Godin expands on story-alignment tools in his 2005 book *All Marketers Are Liars*, outlining three specific techniques for matching a story to an audience’s worldview:
- **Frames**: Framing provides a specific context or perspective that shapes how the audience perceives information. For example, describing a glass as “half full” leads to a more favorable reaction than describing it as “half empty.”
- **Euphemisms**: A euphemism renames the same idea to steer attention away from negative connotations and cast a product in a more favorable light. For example, a marketer might call something “economical” rather than “cheap.”
- **Oxymorons**: In marketing, oxymorons pair two seemingly contradictory ideas to appeal to people whose worldviews contain apparent tensions. For example, marketing “non-alcoholic beer” appeals to people who do not drink but still want to participate in drinking culture.

Stories are a particularly effective tool for cultural change because they capture attention and engage people emotionally, making them more receptive to new ideas and perspectives. Kindra Hall (*Stories That Stick*) explains that one reason storytelling is so powerful is that it is a collaborative process: as you tell a story, in whatever format, your audience mentally fills in the gaps—adding images, feelings, and context to the details you provide—and in doing so, they become personally invested in the outcome.

*References: [All Marketers Are Liars](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/all-marketers-are-liars/1-page-summary) · [how to match your story to your audience’s point of view](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/all-marketers-are-liars/1-page-summary#how-to-appeal-to-a-worldview) · [effective tool for cultural change](https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-06-27/stories-brain-science-memory-social-change) · [Stories That Stick](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/stories-that-stick) · [storytelling is a collaborative process](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/stories-that-stick#why-storytelling-works)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-ae4e35565407a3ce:end -->

<a id="b-7397738c97f08407"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-9962c74b2cd9"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-f76f34f17456"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-b96d3c2d9e69"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-e1430feef529"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-2c5740bc65bd"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-983433c32a56"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-7397738c97f08407:start -->
### Applying Pressure to Drive Action: Problems, Status, and Stakes

Matching a story to the audience is not enough on its own; you also need to inspire action. Godin argues that motivating people to act — whether to sign up for a newsletter, buy a product, or support a candidate — requires applying pressure. The basic mechanism is to present a relatable problem and offer a solution, so the audience feels pressure to resolve the problem by engaging with the brand.

One powerful way to apply pressure is to challenge your core audience’s status — their perceived rank or position within a social group or hierarchy. Godin argues that many decisions are driven by the desire to maintain or shift status, and people pursue status through two distinct pathways: belonging and superiority.

Belonging is the desire to connect with groups or communities whose opinions you value. To pressure people motivated by belonging, give them opportunities to join and be part of something. This dynamic connects directly to Miller’s idea of highlighting a gap between where the customer is and what they want: the gap is between feeling excluded from a valued community and feeling fully included in it. Jones Road Beauty exemplifies this approach: by promoting natural beauty and authenticity, featuring diverse models in inclusive campaigns, and fostering active online community groups, the brand taps into the desire to belong to a community that shares those values.

Superiority is the desire to stand out, differentiate yourself, and demonstrate dominance. To pressure people motivated by superiority, give them opportunities to excel and outperform others. Here, too, the mechanism mirrors Miller’s gap-focused structure: the gap lies between being ordinary and being exceptional. Tesla applies this dynamic by marketing groundbreaking electric vehicles with cutting-edge technology and performance, positioning itself as an industry leader. Customers are motivated to buy a Tesla as a way to signal their superiority and stay ahead of the curve.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-7397738c97f08407:end -->

<a id="b-804c45d1b7534aef"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-e74881527214"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-804c45d1b7534aef:start -->
**The coexistence of fitting in and standing out**

The desires to fit in and to stand out are not mutually exclusive. A study published in the *Journal of Consumer Research* found that the two motives often coexist: people want to fit in with a group while also expressing their individuality. Consumers satisfy both at once by choosing a brand that represents their in-group for group identification, while selecting unique details such as colors or styles to set themselves apart. For example, a snowboarder might wear a popular snowboarding brand jacket to signal membership in the community, but choose an uncommon pattern to stand out from other snowboarders.

*References: [the two desires often coexist](https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120516140115.htm#:~:text=competing%20desires%20for%20group%20identification,choosing%20a%20brand%20that%20represents)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-804c45d1b7534aef:end -->

<a id="b-2dc976e29b275bd2"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-7fa31a9b9598"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-2dc976e29b275bd2:start -->
**Status preferences in social dynamics**

Psychologists note that people tend to have a preferred status — either high or low — and often default to that status in relationships and interpersonal interactions. This preference can lead to mastery in one status role and feelings of incompetence in the other. For example, one person may feel confident taking charge and leading others (high status) but uneasy in a subordinate role (low status); another may feel most comfortable supporting and assisting others (low status) but anxious when placed in a position of authority (high status). Recognizing your own preferred status can increase self-awareness and adaptability in social dynamics.

*References: [people tend to have a preferred status](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-other-side-relationships/201911/the-key-unlocking-the-power-dynamic-in-your-life#:~:text=and%20defers%20to%20the%20high%20status.%20In,Each%20of%20us%20has%20our%20preferred%20status)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-2dc976e29b275bd2:end -->

<a id="b-dad4ab464cf81fe4"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-346e98a28578"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-a018cdbf629b"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-f1513be6935c"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-952ccd9e6b59"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-dad4ab464cf81fe4:start -->
### Change the Story as an Audience Becomes a Culture
Godin argues that the story’s ultimate goal is to transform the culture of a core audience, making the offering part of its norm. Once embedded in a culture, an offering becomes woven into people’s behavior, beliefs, and values—not merely a transaction, but a meaningful part of identity and lifestyle.

Culture changes through a few people first. Before a brand is known, its story should address trendsetters—Godin’s “adopters,” who seek the next new thing—by explaining how the product pushes technical boundaries or revolutionizes an industry. As awareness spreads, the audience shifts toward assimilators, or “adapters,” who tend to follow the crowd. The story must then emphasize familiarity and show how the offering fits into existing routines.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-dad4ab464cf81fe4:end -->

<a id="b-671aa9ca6aa62d53"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-7875c1fe128b"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-7388449bb232"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-671aa9ca6aa62d53:start -->
**From trendsetters to mass audiences: pricing and platform tactics**


Ryan Holiday (*Perennial Seller*) offers a practical tactic for marketing to trendsetters: use price as a tool by lowering the cost barrier or making your product free, which almost always gets more people to try it and gives it a chance to prove its value. Possible pricing models include freemium plans with paid upgrades, free excerpts (such as free book chapters), limited free trials, promotional discount periods, and entirely free products supported by other revenue models (such as ad-supported social apps or sponsored free videos).

Shortform’s source describes TikTok as a bridge from early adopters to broader audiences. Influencer content can connect an offer to familiar trends and help adapters see how it fits their world. Algorithmic discovery offered a possible distribution route in that account; it did not ensure broad reach, audience fit, purchase, or profitable acquisition.

*References: [Perennial Seller](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/perennial-seller) · [use price as a tool to market to trendsetters](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/perennial-seller/part-3b) · [TikTok has become a valuable tool for bridging the gap between early adopters and a broader customer base](https://www.searchenginejournal.com/tiktok-a-key-part-of-consumers-path-to-purchase/437912/#close)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-671aa9ca6aa62d53:end -->

<a id="b-9f003eda4c0fd0db"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-37ce2aa2600e"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-95bacd41ca85"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-21d7044a8199"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-4c51b9965072"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-40552219dd40"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-9f003eda4c0fd0db:start -->
### Word-of-mouth growth and brand community in *This Is Marketing*
In *This Is Marketing*, Seth Godin’s fourth principle is to capitalize on word of mouth. While your initial fans—the trendsetters—appreciate your unique approach, it may not resonate with the wider public. To make the jump to a broader audience, you need a product or service that people want to talk about. Godin explains that the products and services people will talk about are those that become more valuable the more people know about them. Consider dating apps: early adopters of apps like Tinder or Bumble had reason to talk about the product with others. More users meant a wider pool of potential matches and increasingly diverse profiles. The accumulation of user data also allowed the apps to refine their matching algorithms and suggest more accurate, compatible matches. Moreover, the more people use the apps, the less social stigma surrounds using dating apps as a tool of connection.

However, Godin says it is crucial to consistently fulfill the promises you’ve made and provide effective solutions to the problems you claim to solve. By delivering on your brand promise, you build trust with your customers and increase the likelihood of repeat business. This consistency also allows you to cultivate a community and foster a strong brand culture over time. As a result, your customers become your most fervent supporters, advocating for your company’s mission and products. By creating a product that thrives on word of mouth and effectively addresses the needs of your core audience, you can tap into their network power and turn them into invaluable marketing assets. As your core audience sees firsthand how your product or service meets their needs, their enthusiasm for your company grows, prompting them to voluntarily spread your product’s message to attract more people at no additional cost.

Godin’s word-of-mouth model offers a complementary path to brand familiarity compared with Sharp’s mass-reach approach: where Sharp emphasizes broad advertising and visibility to make a brand mentally present for as many people as possible, Godin focuses on turning core fans into active advocates whose personal networks extend the brand’s reach organically. It also complements Dib’s lead-nurturing funnel: while Dib works with leads who have already responded to a message, Godin’s model shows how existing customers can generate new leads through their own networks, feeding the top of the funnel organically.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-9f003eda4c0fd0db:end -->

<a id="b-95baff2dbf24a129"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-a3e3efd6853f"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-95baff2dbf24a129:start -->
**Word-of-Mouth Drivers Beyond Self-Interest**

Shortform adds context about word-of-mouth drivers beyond self-interest. Godin suggests people want to talk about products that become more valuable if more people use them, which supplies one reason for sharing, without establishing that it is the only reason. In *Contagious*, marketing expert Jonah Berger suggests other strategies for harnessing word-of-mouth marketing, including generating an emotional response and providing practical value. These strategies go beyond self-interest and tap into the innate human desire to share experiences, emotions, and valuable information with other people.

*References: [Contagious](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/contagious) · [generating an emotional response](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/contagious/chapter-3) · [providing practical value](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/contagious/chapter-5)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-95baff2dbf24a129:end -->

<a id="b-d035368daf5fe1c2"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-c63f72450288"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-95b012260492"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-070e17a48040"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-09adc0c8f928"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-d035368daf5fe1c2:start -->
**Brand Memory and Word-of-Mouth Acquisition Through Existing Customers**

Existing customers’ reviews may influence potential buyers. Shortform cites historical secondhand reports saying 93% of consumers based purchasing decisions on online reviews and 80% refused to buy from businesses with negative reviews. The complete samples are not supplied here, so these are not current conversion parameters and cannot identify the effect of customer service on acquisition. Service may affect both retention and prospective buyers’ impressions; measure those outcomes separately. This gives a reason to take customer experience seriously without treating every service improvement as proven acquisition.

In *Raving Fans*, Ken Blanchard and Sheldon Bowles offer tips for using customer service as an outreach tool to acquire the new customers needed for growth. Shortform interprets these strategies through acquisition via word of mouth. Blanchard and Bowles also expect retention benefits; nothing in the verified category-growth argument rules those benefits out. Their advice includes:

- **Dig into customer feedback.** When customers describe part of their experience as “fine” or “okay,” it indicates room for improvement; they may even be hiding disappointment to avoid seeming rude or entitled. Aim to have customers raving about every part of their experience.
- **Keep your employees happy.** Employees are “internal customers” you must serve just as much as buyers, and happy employees are more likely to keep customers happy.
- **Don’t promise customers too much at once.** If you set the bar for customer service too high and make promises your company cannot keep, you will lose trust. Instead, be realistic about what your organization can accomplish and make incremental improvements.

This dynamic of repeated positive brand experiences building deeper connection aligns with Pat Flynn’s argument in *Superfans* that consistency is key to cultivating superfans—a small core of passionately devoted customers who are the lifeblood of any organization. Flynn explains that as fans repeatedly have positive experiences with a brand, they move through different levels of connection: from casual, to interested, to connected, before reaching superfandom.

*References: [93% of consumers admit to basing their purchasing decisions on online reviews](https://www.thedrum.com/news/2017/03/27/online-reviews-impact-purchasing-decisions-over-93-consumers-report-suggests) · [80% refuse to buy from businesses with negative reviews](https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/game-changer-cone-survey-finds-4-out-of-5-consumers-reverse-purchase-decisions-based-on-negative-online-reviews-128670633.html) · [Raving Fans](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/raving-fans) · [customer service as an outreach tool](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/raving-fans#happy-customers-are-core-to-your-success) · [Dig into customer feedback](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/raving-fans/step-2#find-out-what-your-external-customers-want) · [Keep your employees happy](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/raving-fans/step-2#identify-your-internal-customers) · [Don’t promise your customers too much at once](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/raving-fans/step-4#consistent-delivery-creates-credibility) · [Superfans](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/superfans) · [consistency is key to cultivating superfans](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/superfans/1-page-summary#how-people-become-superfans)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-d035368daf5fe1c2:end -->

<a id="theme-marketing-plan"></a>

## Build the nine-cell marketing plan from first contact to referral

<a id="b-73614962366db9c0"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-967bedd91e4f"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-775317dae04e"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-d81eac11804e"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-1a5dc1c4fa86"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-af50fda6074a"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-dd426617aefb"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-abd963d80c67"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-ae2cd262e85f"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-074fa60d593c"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-d6de8255c12e"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-d4b5709ed5f5"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-73614962366db9c0:start -->
### The Strategic Role of Marketing in Business Growth

According to business coach and entrepreneur Allan Dib, the purpose of a business is to make money and grow; if a business owner does not make money, they are running a hobby rather than a business. Dib argues that many small businesses fail to thrive because they do not get marketing right, and that for a small business, the surest path to making money and growing is a simple, clear marketing plan defining target prospects and customers and how to reach them. Dib defines marketing as your business strategy for reaching your target market, getting them to like your product or service, and converting them into loyal, ongoing customers. He contends that marketing delivers the greatest leverage of any business activity—meaning the greatest impact for your effort—because growing customers directly drives business growth, which is why you need a marketing strategy or plan. Because marketing grows your business, Dib emphasizes it is a key activity you need to do daily if you are serious about succeeding.

Most small businesses either neglect marketing entirely and rely on word of mouth, or use ill-suited big-business strategies; the right path, in Dib’s view, is a plan centered on direct-response advertising designed to prompt prospects to take action. A strategic marketing plan requires looking beyond individual campaign details—such as your chosen word or core consumer message—to shape your overall tone and approach. *The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing* frames its laws as a tool for thinking through the big picture of your marketing strategy, and its final section, “Get on Top and Stay There,” complements this framing: while the earlier laws help craft your overall marketing plan and message, these final laws address more general advice about how to approach your business.

Shortform adds two useful parallels. Peter Drucker likewise treated marketing as critical to business success, naming it—along with innovation—as one of only two functions that serve a business’s purpose of creating customers. Shortform also points to Michael Gerber’s argument in *The E-Myth Revisited*: small businesses often fail when technically skilled owners, such as talented bakers, lack the business and marketing skills needed to turn that craft into revenue.

*References: [Allan Dib](https://twitter.com/allandib?lang=hi) · [The 1-Page Marketing Plan](https://successwise.com/book/) · [Peter Drucker also argued that marketing is critical to business success](https://www.forbes.com/2006/06/30/jack-trout-on-marketing-cx_jt_0703drucker.html?sh=132bc015555c) · [The E-Myth Revisited](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-e-myth-revisited/1-page-summary)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-73614962366db9c0:end -->

<a id="b-51b041a22bbf9e47"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-0904084f4064"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-e508e9ba5c27"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-a225f52847e1"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-9505e1119216"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-d8e9603b2604"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-a64f65cc9cfb"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-ca48d1d866e2"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-cc913f08b92f"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-27547bd25685"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-932a17db910b"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-17ca1068b6b0"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-af34f2156cb6"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-cd2265ae7719"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-a170c2468f38"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-84f3d3fc5857"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-e9cb1131fd8a"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-49ca2236775b"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-2affb34ecab6"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-0679c3f49485"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-51b041a22bbf9e47:start -->
### Strategy vs. Tactics in Marketing

Dib stresses the distinction between marketing strategy and tactics: a strategy is your high-level approach to reaching and winning new customers, while tactics are the specific methods you use, and your strategy dictates your tactics. He cautions that small business owners often become enamored with the latest digital marketing tactics—such as SEO, video, or pay-per-click advertising—before they have developed an overall strategy. They cobble together a collection of random tactics in hopes of attracting customers, then wonder why they get no results. Others mistakenly believe that having a great product or service constitutes a marketing strategy, assuming that if their product is great, it will naturally attract customers. However, Dib points out, a great product retains customers—once they buy and like it, they will buy again—but you first have to acquire customers through marketing.

Shortform captures the risk with a simple analogy from another marketing strategist: adopting tactics before choosing a strategy is like setting out on vacation without deciding on a destination—you are driving blind.

*References: [that’s like going on vacation without picking a destination—you’re driving blind](https://vibable.com/marketing-without-strategy-is-like-driving-blind/)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-51b041a22bbf9e47:end -->

<a id="b-1e7583172a67deb9"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-fd5a6e275187"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-eedd0af30288"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-c9d501a89bb0"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-880cdd1ce487"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-aea4b3ba98d0"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-1e7583172a67deb9:start -->
### Direct-Response Marketing for Small Businesses

Dib argues that the most effective marketing strategy for a small business owner is direct-response marketing, rather than the mass marketing that big businesses use. Small business owners often try to emulate big business by using mass marketing to increase general product awareness or build a positive image, but Dib contends this wastes money: small businesses need to reach a targeted group of likely customers, not a broad audience whose vast majority will never buy.

Direct-response marketing is targeted to prospects most likely to be interested in your product or service; ads focus on solving their specific problem and are designed to prompt an immediate response by encouraging people to take a specific action. Examples of calls to action include visiting a web page, signing up for a free report or newsletter, joining an email list, or buying—for instance, a financial planner might aim to get parents of high school-age children to sign up for a college finance webinar. Unlike mass marketing, which builds brand awareness, direct-response ads generate sales leads—potential customers you can contact. Dib states that for every $2 you spend on direct-response advertising, you generate about $10 in profits from sales, making it a cost-effective way for small businesses to reach customers.

Shortform notes a terminology problem inside Dib’s presentation: he sometimes uses “marketing” and “advertising” interchangeably and calls advertising both a strategy and a tactic. The American Marketing Association draws a cleaner line—marketing identifies, anticipates, and meets customer needs, whereas advertising is the specific tactic of paying to place a company’s message or brand in selected media.

*References: [American Marketing Association](https://www.ama.org/pages/marketing-vs-advertising/) · [Direct-response marketing](https://www.fool.com/the-blueprint/direct-response-marketing/) · [it’s a cost-effective way for small businesses to reach customers](https://successwise.com/what-is-direct-response-marketing/)*

The reported “$2 spent produces about $10 in profit” is Dib’s promotional illustration in the archive, without a reproducible sample or cost definition here. It is not a return assumption for this plan. A response may become a lead, a customer, or neither; distinguish that sequence from a measured profit result.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-1e7583172a67deb9:end -->

<a id="b-c59938a3bbc1b744"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-5575c8e60d66"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-4b8e06568174"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-113ce8d95e38"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-44affa6f1f78"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-4c6924211dbf"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-c59938a3bbc1b744:start -->
### The 1-Page Marketing Plan Framework: Three Phases and Nine Steps

Dib’s 1-Page Marketing Plan template guides small business owners through three customer-focused phases of marketing: awareness, familiarity, and enthusiasm. Each phase has three steps, and together the nine steps define a customer journey of interactions that walks prospects from knowing nothing about the business to ultimately becoming superfans. You can download Dib’s template for free or design your own by creating three rows of three squares each and filling them in sequentially as you work through the steps. Dib’s plan is rooted in direct-response marketing, and it helps business owners write and implement a direct-response plan without needing to become marketing experts.

The nine cells form a working sequence. The stage names below follow the guide’s wording; they describe the relationship to the business, not Schwartz’s five levels of product awareness.

| Stage and person | First cell | Second cell | Third cell | Transition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness: prospect | 1. Choose the target market | 2. Develop the message | 3. Choose the media | A relevant response creates a lead |
| Familiarity: lead | 4. Capture contact details | 5. Cultivate interest and trust | 6. Convert to a customer | A purchase begins the customer relationship |
| Enthusiasm: customer | 7. Deliver an extraordinary experience | 8. Increase customer value | 9. Encourage referrals | Results support repeat purchase and recommendation |

Use three rows of three squares to write the choices and actions, not just the labels. A prospect may already know the product category well; a captured lead may still doubt the offer. Thus the nine-cell plan and the five awareness levels can inform each other without being equated.

Dib writes that while his plan is intended to simplify and explain marketing, its second purpose is to speed up implementation. Many small business owners fail to implement plans or take action due to analysis paralysis, failure to delegate, or a belief that their business is unique and a particular approach will not work for them. However, knowing what to do is useless if you do not do it. Dib emphasizes that the strategies and tactics underlying his marketing plan are proven, and he expects them to transfer across industries through shared human behavior; this expectation still requires testing against a particular business.

Shortform notes an evidence caveat: critics said the book lacked complete marketing-plan examples for specific industries. Dib later supplied five plans on his website—for a coaching business, medical office, e-commerce business, software company, and real-estate business.

*References: [Download Dib’s template free](http://assets.successwise.com/documents/1PMP-Canvas.pdf) · [coach](https://successwise.com/wp-content/uploads/1PMP-Examples.xlsx-COACHING.pdf) · [medical office](https://successwise.com/wp-content/uploads/1PMP-Examples.xlsx-ORTHODONTICS.pdf) · [e-commerce](https://successwise.com/wp-content/uploads/1PMP-Examples.xlsx-ECOMMERCE.pdf) · [software company](https://successwise.com/wp-content/uploads/1PMP-Examples.xlsx-SOFTWARE.pdf) · [real estate](https://successwise.com/wp-content/uploads/1PMP-Examples.xlsx-REAL-ESTATE.pdf)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c59938a3bbc1b744:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content refinery-dib-target:start -->
### 1. Choose a market that can sustain the business
Dib asks the small business to choose a group it enjoys working with, that values its service, and that will pay for it. The group must be large enough to sustain the business. Start with actual needs, current customers, competitors, and the economics of serving them; the earlier comparison with Sharp explains why a useful initial focus must not become an unsupported belief that nobody else buys. The second and third cells then decide what to say and how to deliver it.
<!-- atlas:block-content refinery-dib-target:end -->

<a id="b-b59fa31825f2f409"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-555367b32754"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-fac31a044577"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-6d2d0a3d9563"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-b59fa31825f2f409:start -->
### 2. Develop a message around the USP

Beyond story structure, several frameworks address how to craft and deliver a persuasive message.

In *The 1-Page Marketing Plan*, Allan Dib’s second step in the awareness phase is to **create a compelling message** that grabs your target prospects’ attention and makes them think, “Hey, that’s just what I need!” — and compels them to act. His first tip is to develop a **unique selling proposition (USP)**: a concise problem-solution statement that tells prospects why they should buy from you rather than a competitor. Dib argues your USP should position you so prospects make an apples-to-oranges comparison between you and your competition, not an apples-to-apples one. Your differentiator can be your product itself, or something else like packaging, delivery, or support.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b59fa31825f2f409:end -->

<a id="b-9229a358c5f75b70"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-5874624996e8"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-c7582a41cf9d"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-9229a358c5f75b70:start -->
**Crafting a unique selling proposition**


Shortform notes that while Dib stresses the purpose of direct-response advertising is to generate leads (future customers) rather than sell immediately, his message-creation tips seem aimed at driving sales as well — so the two goals likely overlap. Shortform also provides additional USP guidance: Dib’s simple formula is describe the problem, describe your solution, and provide proof or a testimonial. Another customizable template follows the structure: for [target customers] who need [specific need], [your brand] is [your category] that provides [key benefit], unlike [competitors], because [your unique differentiator]. Shortform also points to examples of strong USPs from brands including *The Economist*, HelloFresh, Ben & Jerry’s, and Robinhood.

*References: [Here’s another template that you can customize with information about your business](https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/04/07/unique-selling-proposition#best-practices) · [examples of unique selling propositions](https://mktoolboxsuite.com/unique-selling-proposition-examples/)*

The source’s worked example fills each slot: **Acme Beauty Supplies**, a hypothetical supplier, serves salons and hairdressers needing top-quality styling products; its category is a leading distributor of brand-name products; its benefit is the widest selection of popular products with overnight delivery. It contrasts competitors’ dubious sourcing with Acme’s claimed North-American-only sourcing and a guarantee of authenticity and standards. The mechanism is a sequence—specific buyer and need, category, useful benefit, contrast, then a reason to believe—not simply a memorable company name. The example’s superiority, delivery, and sourcing claims would need substantiation in a real business.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-9229a358c5f75b70:end -->

<a id="b-4d74baf0eb051b70"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-7ffb1f2764be"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-28343292378b"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-4d74baf0eb051b70:start -->
**Crafting a compelling offer**

Dib’s second tip for a compelling message is to create a compelling offer. Once you know your niche and USP, structure an offer that excites your target prospects; avoid the lazy approach of simply offering a discount, which will push customers into an apples-to-apples price comparison. He identifies several essential elements of a strong offer:
- Add customer value by bundling extra benefits and bonuses (similar to infomercial tactics).
- Justify the offer (for example, by citing overstock) so prospects don’t suspect it’s too good to be true.
- When a customer is already in a buying mood, add on a high-margin item like a service contract.
- Offer no-hassle payment options that suit the customer.
- Offer an extraordinary guarantee that covers specified losses if the product falls short of expectations.
- Describe genuine scarcity — for example, limited supply or a sale expiration date.

State the guarantee’s scope, remedy, and conditions, and offer it only if you can fulfill it. A real stock limit or deadline can inform a choice; inventing one manufactures pressure. Added items should meet a need, and easy payment should not conceal the total cost.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-4d74baf0eb051b70:end -->

<a id="b-cb75c48e3e2a4767"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-a1357454819b"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-d525ee51dea5"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-33afdee12c5a"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-e13e28f2db36"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-48d8e9b52565"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-510936d469da"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-dc3b6179c459"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-209afabf977c"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-5608ab463f43"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-cb75c48e3e2a4767:start -->
### 3. Select the medium and measure the economics

Step 3 of Dib’s awareness phase is **choosing the right advertising medium** to deliver your message to your target prospects. Because advertising is the most expensive part of marketing, Dib recommends choosing and managing media based on return on investment (ROI) — incremental contribution after the relevant campaign costs, divided by those costs. By tracking results (using tools like toll-free numbers, web analytics, and coupon codes), you can drop underperforming ads and scale the ones that work. To pick a medium or channel — such as direct mail/print, TV/radio, email, social media, or web/SEO — identify and go where your target prospects spend their time. Dib cautions that while social media marketing is popular, it has downsides: it’s time-consuming to monitor, and you’re at the mercy of the platform, which owns your profile and page. For affordability and effectiveness, Dib’s top recommended media for small businesses are email and direct (snail) mail.

Dib argues that despite the appeal of social media and email, regular snail mail should also be part of your marketing strategy. Direct mail works well because:
- People connect emotionally with physical objects; unlike emails, they often save letters and cards sent through the USPS.
- Direct mail has a longer shelf life and takes more effort to dispose of than email, which can be deleted instantly and forgotten.
- Physical mailboxes are becoming less cluttered, so your message stands out more, while email inboxes are overflowing despite all the sorting tools available.

The overarching principle for messaging is to use a mix of media appropriate for your target prospects, avoid over-relying on any single channel like social media for lead generation, and track ROI consistently.

For clarity, ROI = (incremental contribution before campaign cost − campaign cost) / campaign cost. Leads per dollar, cost per lead, and cost per acquired customer are useful funnel measures, but they are not ROI. Tracking codes indicate attributed responses; they do not by themselves establish what would have happened without the campaign.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-cb75c48e3e2a4767:end -->

<a id="b-b2e2192e853c228e"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-ac73cd66560f"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-518a2e13cee1"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-e7af5efddec5"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-c294121825c7"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-8df8551269a5"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-ea7aa38f30a2"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-b2e2192e853c228e:start -->
### 4. Capture the lead with permission

The first step in the familiarity phase is to capture leads by collecting their contact information in a database so you can follow up. This is critical because only a small percentage of people who express initial interest—for example, by downloading a free report or video—will be ready to buy immediately. If you do not capture their names and contact information, they will forget about you soon after viewing your ad, and you will lose the opportunity to turn them into customers later. Capturing them in a database allows you to develop their interest over time, so a sale follows naturally.

Dib describes your marketing infrastructure—direct-response ads and a database—as an engine that will keep generating sales into the future; he claims that while only 3% of leads may buy now, 40% may buy in the future. To manage this marketing infrastructure, he recommends investing in a CRM (customer relationship management) system, which allows you to organize, track, and analyze customer data.

The 3% now and 40% later numbers are the source’s illustrative claims without a defined cohort or follow-up window here. They justify asking when interest may mature, not forecasting that these proportions of your database will buy. Capture contact details with permission; database inclusion is not consent to unlimited follow-up.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b2e2192e853c228e:end -->

<a id="b-d739043daabdcfde"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-dfea1e661df6"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-cf739c9a1246"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-ad4425a66782"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-87fe00b261d7"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-d91505c7cefc"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-d739043daabdcfde:start -->
### 5. Cultivate leads with increasing value
Dib recommends moving an interested lead toward a considered purchase through a sequence of useful contacts: perhaps a newsletter, then a book, seminar, or free audit. The purpose is to develop understanding, demonstrate expertise, and earn trust before asking for a sale.

He suggests a multistep process with ten or more contacts, supported by CRM reminders, monthly emails, and prompts to call. This is his planning suggestion, not a quota or a guarantee that persistence will be welcomed. Relevance, consent, the person’s response, and an easy way to decline govern continued contact. Even useful material does not make a sale effortless or override a request to stop.

Shortform’s limitation: The effectiveness of marketing lead nurturing is hard to measure and does not always produce quality leads.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-d739043daabdcfde:end -->

<a id="b-e8493cf8fd37f6be"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-25a59ba3edeb"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-70bba1566571"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-8d18dbfeebd0"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-4b11b7d7a2ed"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-571c6b3a121b"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-c52c622adf74"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-8800db363e0c"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-e8493cf8fd37f6be:start -->
### 6. Convert through useful advice and a credible offer
Dib recommends positioning the seller as an educator, advisor, and problem-solver. A report or webinar can help the lead understand a real problem; continued useful contact can demonstrate expertise. Shortform compares this with Challenger teaching and with Pink’s criticism of pressure-based “always be closing.” Trust can reduce friction, but does not make buying inevitable.

His second recommendation is a substantial guarantee. Identify the loss the buyer fears and state a remedy you can fulfill. In the home-repair example, the buyer fears a mess; a promise to leave the home cleaner or pay for a cleaner addresses that concern. The archive’s promise to fix the problem “forever” cannot be assumed credible. A refund, cleaning remedy, or trial covers particular losses and conditions, not every risk or cost of choosing badly.

Third, Dib recommends premium positioning rather than merely matching competitors or adding a standard markup to cost. Some customers will pay for a demonstrably better fit or result, and a high-priced main offer can make another option seem modest by comparison. A premium is a strategic choice requiring real value and willingness to pay; it is not a universal cure for commoditization.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-e8493cf8fd37f6be:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe394530dc0d9552--experience:start -->
### 7. Deliver an extraordinary experience

The first step in building customer enthusiasm is delivering a standout experience that helps turn customers into superfans. Dib recommends four strategies to support this goal.

First, ensure the customer actually gets results from the product. Many customers use a product incorrectly, conclude it does not work, and never return, so businesses should walk them through setup and use, anticipate problems, and provide solutions. For example, help a customer set up a new laptop, install software, and learn key features.

Second, innovate to make the product or service entertaining in some aspect of delivery, packaging, or support. For instance, take photos or video of a customer picking up a new car in the driver’s seat so she can share it on social media.

Third, put effective business systems in place so the promise of a standout experience can be consistently delivered. (Shortform note: In *[Traction](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/traction)*, Gino Wickman explains how to create systems and processes that keep your business running in your absence and make it more valuable if you decide to sell it, because it performs consistently and measurably.)

Fourth, use technology to smooth rather than frustrate the customer journey; the online ordering, payment, confirmation, and delivery information process should be flawless. (Shortform note: [Technology problems with customer service](https://vhtcx.com/blog/5-causes-customer-frustration-fix/) are a major source of customer frustration. They include confusing phone menus, long wait times, and dropped calls.)
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe394530dc0d9552--experience:end -->

<a id="b-4c37ef6816b73e4e"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-64ad2b3210ae"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-94ac86876f72"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-701844b13a3d"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-3f0558df168b"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-4c37ef6816b73e4e:start -->
### 8. Increase the value of the customer relationship

After delivering a memorable experience, the second step in Dib’s enthusiasm phase is getting customers to buy more. Dib repeats an often-quoted statistic that people are 21 times more likely to buy from a business they have already purchased from than from one they have not, meaning companies that ignore post-purchase marketing leave significant revenue on the table. Dib then outlines five strategies to increase customers’ lifetime value and earn more profit from existing customers: raise prices (which most customers will accept if trust has been built, the business is positioned as an expert, and the experience has been strong), bundle add-ons with the primary product (such as a mouse, chargers, keyboard protector, and carrying case with a new laptop), upgrade customers to higher-priced, higher-margin products and services, automate repeat purchases through reminders (for example, for vehicle servicing), subscriptions, vouchers, or freebies tied to spending or quantity thresholds, and restart lapsed customers with a gift card or coupon.

The source reports a 21-times repeat-purchase comparison without a sufficiently defined sample or intervention here. Do not treat it as a forecast from adopting these five tactics. For each tactic, count incremental contribution and effects on trust, rather than assuming an extra item or order is automatically a profitable improvement.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-4c37ef6816b73e4e:end -->

<a id="b-5e10ffbc33299829"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-81a9d2d68f17"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-ef0ebb0f0ad0"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-6dc576109b00"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5e10ffbc33299829:start -->
### 9. Ask for referrals and build complementary partnerships

The final step in creating enthusiastic superfans is prompting referrals. Dib stresses that hoping for word-of-mouth is not enough; consistent referrals require a deliberate system. He recommends two core approaches. First, actively solicit referrals from customers who have had great experiences. Many businesses hesitate to ask because they fear sounding desperate, but Dib argues customers do not see referrals as a favor to the business—they refer friends because it makes them look good. To support this, businesses can give customers a gift card or discount card to pass along to a friend or associate, and can set expectations early by mentioning during the sales process that the customer will have a great experience and the business would appreciate referrals. Second, set up a mutual referral system with a complementary business; for example, a financial planner and an accountant or insurance agent can refer clients to each other.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5e10ffbc33299829:end -->

<a id="b-08f85972d33a27aa"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-b864e95d72bd"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-77d9c4728f23"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-32bbf19037bc"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-08f85972d33a27aa:start -->
### Customer Lifetime Value, Repeat Purchases, and Referrals

Shortform adds a simple revenue CLV estimate: average order value × purchases per year × average retention in years. Frequency and duration must share a time unit. This estimates revenue across a relationship, not contribution or a permissible acquisition budget. A decision model also considers margin, fulfillment and service costs, acquisition cost, retention uncertainty, and when cash arrives. Different formulas answer different questions. Some practitioners use CLV to identify and expand high-value segments; that recommendation remains in tension with Sharp’s warning against neglecting light category buyers.

There are also many additional ways to increase CLV and repeat purchases: create unexpected delights such as birthday coupons, provide detailed product information to increase purchase likelihood, personalize the shopping experience, offer multiple return options, reward loyalty, and create frequent-buyer programs and exclusive offers.

Beyond repeat purchases, strong customer relationships drive referrals. Additional tactics for generating referrals include making the customer experience so compelling that people want to share it on their own, using LinkedIn to identify high-potential referral targets, creating a formal customer referral program, and offering incentives for referrals.

*References: [there are different formulas and variations](https://hbr.org/2014/07/how-valuable-are-your-customers) · [identifying your most valuable customers, profiling them, and focusing on building that segment](https://mailchimp.com/clv/) · [many other ways to increase customer lifetime value or purchases](https://www.webfx.com/blog/marketing/20-easy-ways-to-increase-customer-lifetime-value/) · [Additional ways to generate referrals](https://blog.hubspot.com/service/how-to-get-referrals?toc-variant-a=)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-08f85972d33a27aa:end -->

<a id="b-79a259a2295b3897"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-4ed9e17a4fae"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-79a259a2295b3897:start -->
### Customer Lifetime Value as an Alternative to the Retention-Acquisition Dichotomy

Shortform presents an alternative perspective: some argue that Sharp’s framing of retention versus acquisition is a false dichotomy. You do not need to choose one or the other to design a cheap yet effective marketing strategy. Instead, marketers should focus on retaining or acquiring whichever customers are the most valuable, using the metric of customer lifetime value (CLV)—a prediction of the total sales you will earn from a specific customer.

In *The Four-Hour Workweek*, Tim Ferriss describes how calculating CLV helped him boost profits when he was selling brain supplements to distributors. Initially, he treated all his clients equally, no matter how valuable they were. When he calculated his clients’ CLV, however, Ferriss found that five of his 120 clients were generating 95% of his profits. He therefore began spending more effort maintaining relationships with his most valuable clients to increase his chances of retaining them, and cut ties with low-value clients who behaved unprofessionally. He also studied his top five customers and used the commonalities he found to find new, equally valuable customers. Instead of relying blindly on either retention or acquisition, he calculated which customers were worth trying to retain and which he should try to acquire.

High lifetime value can justify a higher acquisition or service budget, not an unlimited one. The case reports 95% of profits, not 95% of revenue. Expected incremental contribution must cover acquisition and servicing costs, allowing for retention uncertainty and the timing of cash receipts. A revenue-based CLV estimate alone does not establish that a customer is profitable.

*References: [using the metric of customer lifetime value (CLV)](https://www.forbes.com/sites/blakemorgan/2019/04/29/does-it-still-cost-5x-more-to-create-a-new-customer-than-retain-an-old-one/?sh=3ae04b193516) · [The Four-Hour Workweek](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-4-hour-workweek/part-2#pareto-and-the-80-20-rule)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-79a259a2295b3897:end -->

<a id="b-0dc9ceaa850469a7"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-79b425cc3109"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-89146f32a227"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-fdd58d1d4e0a"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-c4dd70b0f64b"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-d153041e9182"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-75a3d37c8bf1"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-c180a30cd842"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-e438f402ee06"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-29f352816deb"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-0dc9ceaa850469a7:start -->
### Loyalty rewards and discounts: distinguish rewarded activity from changed activity
The book’s critique of loyalty programs is that points and free products may reward heavy buyers for purchases they would have made anyway. Members’ high purchase frequency by itself does not prove the program caused it: people who already buy frequently are also more likely to enroll. The source argues that need-driven purchasing schedules limit how much such rewards can increase buying. That is a reason to measure incremental behavior, not a proof that no program can ever work.

Discounts pose a different, partly overlapping problem. They cut margin, so extra volume must first cover the reduction in contribution on purchases that would have happened at full price. They may also bring future demand forward rather than create it. In the source’s example, a half-price car wash leaves the car clean the next day, making another immediate wash less likely. The purchase occurred earlier and at a lower price. Acquiring additional category buyers can expand the base without relying on higher purchase frequency, but its costs still have to be covered.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-0dc9ceaa850469a7:end -->

<a id="b-fb55559a877c4860"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-ec82fc631ea3"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-fb55559a877c4860:start -->
### Subscriptions change billing; their profit still needs testing
Shortform presents subscriptions as a counterpoint to Sharp’s criticism of loyalty schemes: recurring fees make billing predictable. They do not by themselves fix how often customers use or buy the product. An all-you-can-eat offer may attract the very heavy buyers who would otherwise pay more, creating selection and cannibalization problems.

In the archived Taco Bell example, $10 bought access to one taco a day for a month. At the cited individual price of about $2, a subscriber could receive as many as 30 tacos for the price of five. A customer who would already buy more than five may pay less for consumption that would have occurred anyway. The analogous Prime Video question is whether frequent users would otherwise have bought or rented the same content individually. These examples identify displaced revenue; they do not establish actual program losses without fulfillment costs, extra purchases, unused entitlements, retention, and incremental customers.

Light buyers may decline an intimidating commitment while heavy buyers self-select into the plan. That possibility calls for a comparison with what those people would have done without the subscription, rather than assuming recurring revenue is incremental profit. The prices and service descriptions here belong to the historical source, not a current offer check.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fb55559a877c4860:end -->

<a id="b-9160ecf7462bf401"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-12abaac7feda"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-9160ecf7462bf401:start -->
**Acquisition, retention, and incremental value**

Dib favors customer development and repeat purchase; Sharp gives acquisition priority for brand growth. Compare the incremental contribution and time horizon of each intervention. A historical retention-efficiency claim does not settle every budget, and a growth pattern does not justify unlimited acquisition cost.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-9160ecf7462bf401:end -->

<a id="b-f64d0a8e08d0fef3"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-51f82e96d568"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-794a01e1c551"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-6f54057dbf02"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-8da16463ef5f"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-f64d0a8e08d0fef3:start -->
**Familiarity across a market and familiarity within a lead funnel**

Dib’s familiarity phase moves people who have already responded from a captured lead toward a purchase. Sharp’s broad reach builds memories among category buyers, including people whose names the business does not know. They can support each other, but they are different units of work: a contact database is not market penetration.

The offers also need separating. Dib’s escalating-value contacts—a newsletter, book, seminar, or audit—aim to deepen an interested prospect’s understanding and trust. A discount to an existing buyer may instead subsidize or advance a purchase that would already occur. Compare the incremental effect of each, rather than deciding that all offers help or all offers hurt.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-f64d0a8e08d0fef3:end -->

<a id="b-ac5c660671504e94"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-25045b1d1369"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-2e9c9658c4a2"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-93c91c851e7a"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-07242121aa4c"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-11a33b814892"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-ac5c660671504e94:start -->
### Pricing as a story-alignment tool
Godin identifies two concrete tools for aligning a brand’s story with an audience’s self-perception: branding and price. Price, in particular, is a strategic positioning tool: a high price can signal exclusivity and high quality, while a low price can signal affordability and accessibility. Neither approach is inherently better; they simply appeal to different audiences, and the chosen price should match the target audience’s point of view. McDonald’s and Gucci both use price effectively but in opposite ways: McDonald’s emphasizes affordability, value, and convenience to reach a broad consumer base, while Gucci uses premium pricing to build an image of exclusivity, prestige, craftsmanship, and indulgence for a selective luxury segment. Each brand’s pricing aligns with the self-perception of its target market.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-ac5c660671504e94:end -->

<a id="b-2553e1cc8b680b14"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-e4a85e4cc927"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-2553e1cc8b680b14:start -->
### A high price can signal quality; it cannot establish it
Shortform cites research on the price-quality heuristic: when quality is difficult to observe, consumers may use price as a clue. That is a claim about perceived quality, not proof of actual quality or advice to set an arbitrary high price whenever uncertain. A premium still needs relevant value, credible delivery, and customers willing and able to pay. Compare conversion, contribution, and customer outcomes rather than inferring success from the price signal alone.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-2553e1cc8b680b14:end -->

<a id="b-a1206a8055836f48"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-18d7e3bab630"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-627e31fb206e"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-9400664abed4"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-a1206a8055836f48:start -->
**Lead Conversion and Trust-Building Strategies**


Shortform adds two qualifications to Dib’s conversion advice. In *Traction*, Gino Wickman recommends building a guarantee into the marketing strategy: identify customers’ greatest frustrations and concerns, then design a guarantee that addresses them and wins more business. Calling it a pledge, commitment, or promise can give it greater weight. In *New Sales. Simplified.*, Mike Weinberg cautions that premium pricing requires differentiation: the seller must justify the price by communicating the value created, which calls for a compelling sales story.

Along the lines of building trust, many sales experts advocate a consultative method of selling, in which the salesperson asks questions about customer needs and concerns and helps create a solution to the customer’s problem. A version of this method is described in *SPIN Selling*.

*References: [making a guarantee part of your marketing strategy](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/traction/chapter-3) · [create a compelling sales story](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/new-sales-simplified/chapters-7-8) · [SPIN Selling](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/spin-selling/)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-a1206a8055836f48:end -->

<a id="b-9099af7d8776906f"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-909e9eee4023"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-9099af7d8776906f:start -->
**Creative offers and response rates**

Shortform adds that beyond standard offer elements, extra creativity with your offer can significantly boost response rates. For example, a car dealer might offer high-end clients an exclusive preview of new models, complete with catered food and a limousine ride to the event. The key is to make the offer entertaining and unique — something that would make you want to act if you received it. Shortform also points to additional examples of compelling offers for different product types.

*References: [being extra creative with your offer can significantly boost your response rate](https://www.businessknowhow.com/directmail/response/response-rate.htm) · [examples of compelling offers](https://www.leadquizzes.com/blog/25-brilliant-examples-of-compelling-offers-that-customers-cant-refuse/)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-9099af7d8776906f:end -->

<a id="b-cd79f390b3b26e28"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-a45afcb412a9"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-cd79f390b3b26e28:start -->
**Choosing the right marketing medium**


Shortform adds a framework for small businesses evaluating media options: key questions include what you want the marketing effort to accomplish, where your target prospects go for information, what information you want to convey and when, and what your budget is.

*References: [questions for small businesses to weigh in choosing media](https://www.dummies.com/business/marketing/choose-the-best-media-for-marketing-your-small-business/)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-cd79f390b3b26e28:end -->

<a id="b-0a217d713d87e55a"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-b6c152b4af9a"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-ae700888ba3f"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-eece0bd7cde3"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-e6eecf9c9f85"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-0a217d713d87e55a:start -->
### Email: a direct channel with an owned contact relationship
Dib recommends email as an inexpensive, personal channel that can automate useful contacts. It can capture visitors through opt-in forms, nurture people not yet ready to buy, deepen customer relationships, and test or launch products. A clear offer may prompt a quick response; it does not guarantee instant cash.

The archived guide names Mailchimp, ConvertKit, and ActiveCampaign as commercial systems for automation, delivery, and compliance-related features, instead of using ordinary Outlook or Gmail accounts for mass sends. These are historical examples, not a current product comparison. A tool can support consent, unsubscribe handling, and delivery; it cannot make every message or sending practice compliant by itself.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-0a217d713d87e55a:end -->

<a id="b-faff0366a7389856"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-23e80554f0bb"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-4fec7c296d1c"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-cd247ba8025a"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-faff0366a7389856:start -->
### Email campaigns: strategy, structure, and performance

Shortform rounds out email campaign planning with additional best practices from marketing strategists. Key questions to answer when designing an email campaign include: what outcome you want to achieve, who your niche target is, what matters to those prospects and what value you’ll provide, what timeline you’ll follow, how you’ll plan your emails and follow-ups, how you’ll write subject lines that drive clicks (by promising value and personalizing), what call to action you’ll include, how you’ll let recipients opt out, how you’ll test your email across devices, and which metrics you’ll track. Shortform also points to a planning template and examples of successful campaigns.

Shortform notes that Miller’s email structure is essentially a condensed version of the full storyline, reinforcing his principle that you should tell truncated versions of your storyline even in small marketing pieces. This logic extends to other formats like social media marketing: implement your storyline *everywhere*. Shortform adds context on email performance: across most industries, open rates hover around 20%, but unsubscribe rates are also low — usually around 0.20%. This supports Miller’s view that email is a useful way to at least get your brand name in front of customers, because while few people open the emails, most stay subscribed and continue to see your brand name in their inboxes.

*References: [key questions to answer when planning an email campaign](https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/email-marketing-examples-list?toc-variant-a=) · [in most industries, email open rates hover around 20%](https://mailchimp.com/resources/email-marketing-benchmarks/)*

The guide’s suggested 20% open rate and 0.20% unsubscribe rate are archived benchmarks, not current standards or evidence of profit. A low unsubscribe rate does not show that recipients read or remember the message; interpret it alongside actual engagement, conversions, and explicit feedback.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-faff0366a7389856:end -->

<a id="b-909af744a09ba1a0"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-97569c0654ba"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-909af744a09ba1a0:start -->
### Direct mail and email measure different responses
Shortform cites historical Direct Marketing Association figures of 4.4% direct-mail response versus 1.12% email response. It also cites an NPD comparison in which 30% read email and 16% took action, while 47% read direct mail and 27% bought something. A Valassis survey reported that 44% of millennials preferred offers by ordinary mail, compared with 40% by mobile phone.

These preserve the original outcomes and populations; response, reading, action, purchase, and channel preference are not interchangeable. Without the samples, dates, campaign costs, and contribution, they do not establish a universal profit advantage. Their useful implication is to consider a suitable channel mix and measure it, rather than dismissing physical mail simply because digital channels exist.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-909af744a09ba1a0:end -->

<a id="b-dd52ba3d5d14f2aa"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-f046dcf2f8fa"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-598739a67ada"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-359650208aa2"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-dd52ba3d5d14f2aa:start -->
### Content and social media as demand-generation channels
*The Sales Acceleration Formula* frames content and social media as core tools for aligning marketing and sales to capture buyer interest in a shifting consumer landscape. As consumer habits change, sales professionals are leveraging social networks like Twitter and LinkedIn to showcase their industry expertise. Online conversations have become a preferred method for identifying prospective customers, often attracting them more effectively than traditional approaches. Participating in online discussions and creating educational content such as blog posts, e-books, and webinars are effective strategies for businesses to draw in prospects. Social promotion can help interested people and search engines discover content. Google’s public guidance does not establish a direct ranking formula based on follower counts or share frequency, and promotion does not guarantee higher rankings. [Google Search Central](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/seo-starter-guide)

Companies can strengthen their content marketing by building a dedicated creative development team and a robust content generation framework. This enables consistent production of material tailored to the unique preferences of their customer base, using a segmented approach that serves specific market segments. Strategies like search engine optimization are particularly effective at drawing in people who are just beginning their buying journey with research.

Shortform’s limitation: Relying on social media and content marketing assumes all target audiences use those platforms, which may not hold across all demographics or industries.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-dd52ba3d5d14f2aa:end -->

<a id="b-4527c54038511dfb"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-3eb289ceba68"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-24bc4e4e20aa"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-310daa30a715"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-4527c54038511dfb:start -->
**Using long-tail content to reach underserved market niches and attract buyers**

A fresh approach to captivating the market and attracting buyers draws on “long tail” principles to identify underserved market niches. Content creation targeted at specific market trends or consumer inquiries focuses on previously neglected segments; material that resonates with and aligns to the interests of the intended audience often connects more successfully with that specific group. Businesses that expand their reach within specialized market segments typically attract a large pool of potential high-value customers, driving significant growth in both visitor traffic and transaction frequency.

Shortform’s limitation: The “long tail” marketing approach may not be cost-effective for every business, especially if niche markets are too small to generate meaningful revenue.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-4527c54038511dfb:end -->

<a id="b-07b64a0fab5f443e"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-a6d20ee5ca40"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-07b64a0fab5f443e:start -->
**Traditional Marketing’s Ongoing Relevance**

Some marketers in the archived debate argue that traditional channels remain useful. The reports they cite describe greater trust in newspaper ads than search ads, stronger direct-mail response than email, paid search, and social media, and an increase in broadcast and cable television viewing during the period those reports discussed. These are historical observations about trust, response, and viewing. The practical proposal is to test suitable old and new channels rather than discard a medium by age.

Across this channel comparison, keep investment, attention, response, purchase, and contribution separate. Historical figures can suggest an experiment; actual audience coverage and incremental contribution determine whether a channel earns its cost.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-07b64a0fab5f443e:end -->

<a id="b-ba521b069b6d61e9"></a>
<a id="u-how-brands-grow-9a24a258297a"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-ba521b069b6d61e9:start -->
**Mass Marketing’s Endurance and Coexistence With New Channels**

Shortform places claims about mass marketing’s survival beside a historical spending estimate: North American marketers spent about $64.5 billion on television advertising in 2021. The forecast cited at that time anticipated a plateau rather than a decline in the following years. This shows continued investment and the forecast then being made; spending alone does not establish effectiveness.

Permission marketing—where brands let consumers opt into branded messaging they want, such as a branded email newsletter, instead of forcing product information on mass audiences that likely do not care—offers a clear example. In 2009, the *Huffington Post* declared permission marketing the movement that would kill mass marketing; instead, established big brands that rose to prominence in the traditional marketing era have added permission marketing channels rather than replacing their direct advertising. The historical Domino’s Pizza example combines discounts to customers who sign up for its emails and text messages (permission marketing) with continued investment in television commercials and billboards (traditional mass marketing).

*References: [have been reporting the death of mass marketing for years](https://quantumdigital.com/mass-marketing-is-dead-make-way-for-personal-marketing) · [popular medium for mass marketing](https://www.masterclass.com/articles/mass-marketing#3-examples-of-mass-marketing) · [spent an estimated 64.5 billion dollars on television advertisements in 2021](https://www.statista.com/statistics/882008/tv-advertising-expenditure-in-north-america/) · [when a brand gives consumers an opportunity to opt into branded messaging they’re interested in](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/permission-marketing.asp) · [declared permission marketing to be the movement that would kill mass marketing](https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-death-of-mass-marketi_b_226716)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-ba521b069b6d61e9:end -->

<a id="b-27db22a107696d85"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-28e4d13bc1f1"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-19d24189c371"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-27db22a107696d85:start -->
**Mass Marketing Decline and Direct-Response Tradeoffs**

Other commentators in the archive argue that mass-marketing effectiveness had declined, even for large businesses, citing fragmented media, new platforms and devices, multitasking, and skipping or tuning out ads. One historical estimate put television advertising’s 2010 effectiveness at about 35% of its 1990 level; the local account does not define a reproducible effectiveness measure. A CEO writing in the *Wall Street Journal* then forecast more activity-specific advertising as connected cars, coffee pots, and health trackers created new contact moments. Those were the conditions and expectations of the original reports, not a present-day forecast. Dib’s preference for small-business direct response remains a competing allocation choice: comparatively simple email or physical mail may suit a business better than sophisticated targeting, depending on its actual results.

Shortform also records two disadvantages that other strategists see in direct-response marketing: a message may struggle to stand out amid competing messages, and the channels commonly used for direct response—mass email and direct mail—are subject to legal regulation.

*References: [the effectiveness of mass marketing has been declining](https://www.ukessays.com/essays/marketing/the-declining-effectiveness-of-mass-advertising-marketing-essay.php) · [advertising will increasingly capitalize on everyday moments and needs](https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-future-of-advertising-farewell-mass-marketing-1430105034) · [disadvantages of direct-response marketing](https://www.nibusinessinfo.co.uk/content/advantages-and-disadvantages-direct-marketing)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-27db22a107696d85:end -->

<a id="b-4d94cc4df13fff62"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-a6e5037b27b3"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-4d94cc4df13fff62:start -->
**Referral marketing: return and timing**

The source describes referrals as a high-return tactic that may bring people already interested in the product, but provides no comparable cost-and-contribution evidence establishing a ranking across marketing strategies. Ask after a good experience, while the customer’s enthusiasm is fresh; waiting may let it fade. Miller’s suggestion to ask after one or two purchases fits that early window. Track the cost of incentives and conversion rather than treating the source’s praise as a budget ranking.

*References: [they have what the source calls a high return on investment](https://www.forbes.com/sites/steliefti/2019/06/07/why-referrals-are-the-most-valuable-form-of-marketing-and-how-to-get-more/?sh=3c9cd3f51161)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-4d94cc4df13fff62:end -->

<a id="b-0c4a621e28006a87"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-a2cef0a7840f"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-fffcf80288cc"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-0c4a621e28006a87:start -->
**Customer Experience Strategy and Differentiation**


Many consultants recommend building a formal Customer Experience (CX) strategy. To create one, map the customer journey of all interactions with the business, define customer expectations, identify how to solve customer problems, offer self-service options, train customer service staff, collect feedback regularly, and track performance. Strong CX is a major competitive differentiator; customers who have great experiences are more forgiving of problems, more likely to buy more, and more trusting of the company.

Experiences often resonate more than products for two key reasons. First, they are easier to relate to: you can connect more meaningfully with a buyer by sharing your own experience, such as “I love photography, so the largest storage option on my phone lets me keep all my memories.” Second, modern buyers care more about what they do than about what they own — for instance, 72% of millennials say they prefer experiences to products.

*References: [your approach to creating the best possible customer experience for your product or service](https://blog.hubspot.com/service/customer-experience-strategy?toc-variant-a=) · [Customer experience is a major differentiator](https://www.qualtrics.com/experience-management/customer/design-customer-experience-strategy/) · [Experiences often resonate more than products because](https://www.higherlogic.com/blog/customers-buy-experiences-not-products/)*

The source’s 72% millennial preference for experiences is an archived survey report, not a universal cohort trait or a reason to disregard functional product needs. The experience lens is useful when it identifies a benefit this customer actually values.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-0c4a621e28006a87:end -->

<a id="b-334b9a83e0810cef"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-107c5620e01b"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-3eaa8dfc76b4"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-c2ebf2c9631a"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-fba22f01b301"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-334b9a83e0810cef:start -->
Marketing planning frameworks vary in structure and focus. Shortform contrasts Dib’s customer-centered one-page template with other experts’ three-to-five-phase marketing plans, which tend to organize work around the company’s internal process and can therefore be more complex. Their stages may include mission, situation analysis, marketing strategy and planning, marketing mix, implementation, and control. Dib’s template is reminiscent of the Business Model Canvas developed by Alexander Osterwalder and later described in his 2010 book *Business Model Generation*, which outlines nine building blocks for starting a business. Others have created similar spinoff templates for marketing plans, such as the Marketing Canvas, but they are more detailed than Dib’s one-page plan and are not designed specifically for small businesses. Compared to these alternatives, Dib’s template streamlines the process of creating a marketing plan. Inexperienced small business owners often hire a consultant to draw up a business plan, which usually includes a marketing section. The problem, Dib contends, is that these plans are so generic they are useless for guiding daily operations, and they end up shelved and forgotten. Alternatively, some business owners try to learn the myriad complexities of marketing but soon give up; marketing has mushroomed from the simple idea of moving goods from producer to consumer in the late 1700s into a multifaceted professional discipline with an array of theories, practices, metrics, and ever-evolving jargon. In contrast, Dib touts his one-page plan as a “marketing implementation breakthrough” that allows any small business owner to immediately grasp and customize the few key marketing concepts they really need. You can view Dib’s books and training materials on his website successwise.com, or email him at allan@successwise.com.

*References: [successwise.com](https://successwise.com/) · [mushroomed from the simple idea of moving goods from producer to consumer in the late 1700s](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_marketing) · [ever-evolving jargon](https://www.vendasta.com/blog/marketing-dictionary-definitions-and-jargon-you-need-know/) · [Business Model Canvas](https://www.strategyzer.com/canvas) · [Business Model Generation](https://www.strategyzer.com/books/business-model-generation) · [Marketing Canvas](https://laurentbouty.com/marketingcanvas) · [mission, situation analysis, marketing strategy/planning, marketing mix, implementation and control](https://www.smartsheet.com/strategic-marketing-processes-and-planning)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-334b9a83e0810cef:end -->

<a id="b-5a8bf426d8026ed8"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-8afa36051e9f"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5a8bf426d8026ed8:start -->
**Analysis Paralysis in Decision-Making**


Analysis paralysis—also referred to as overthinking—has causes including fear of making mistakes and simply having too much information. Some antidotes are trusting your instincts, accepting uncertainty, and making small choices quickly.

*References: [Analysis paralysis is also referred to as overthinking](https://www.healthline.com/health/mental-health/analysis-paralysis#start-small)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5a8bf426d8026ed8:end -->

<a id="theme-story-copy"></a>

## Match the headline and proof to the buyer’s knowledge

<a id="b-16a75c7cdb60b8a2"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-012da11d3d53"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-334a8203b06b"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-ab33e1361227"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-22736500538c"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-16a75c7cdb60b8a2:start -->
### Research the headline, then develop its promise
The local Shortform guide organizes Schwartz’s advertising advice around a headline and body copy. The headline earns further attention; the copy develops and supports its premise. This is the guide’s two-part teaching structure. Its selection of four copy strategies below should not be mistaken for an inventory of every technique in the original book.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-16a75c7cdb60b8a2:end -->

<a id="b-5f310d1a9907820c"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-81c1e9c56de7"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-5c7ce21b0d12"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-b272f26e18ef"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-4ff913a08e6d"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-18444f73fc10"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-8914b06d10ca"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-11ef0b73bdac"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-9f9c4a37e7d4"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-82db0f5466c0"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-250a7231c3be"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5f310d1a9907820c:start -->
### Three Purposes of a Strong Headline—and the Research Behind It
According to Schwartz, the headline is the first and most important part of an advertisement to work on because it serves three purposes. First, it captures attention with a dramatic statement or curiosity—for example, “If you don’t read this, you’ll lose $1,000 this year,” or “The money-saving secret fuel companies don’t want you to know.” Second, it resonates with what customers want and promises to fulfill a specific need. Customers use the headline to decide whether the copy is relevant and worth reading: “Fill your gas tank for half the price” speaks to budget-conscious drivers, while non-drivers have little reason to continue. Third, it establishes the premise the copy will expand. After the half-price-gas headline, readers expect the copy to explain why high gas prices matter before showing how to get a cheaper deal.

Writing a headline that captures attention, resonates, and sets up the copy depends on researching three things: what customers want, how aware they are of your product, and how aware they are of competing products. These research tracks help you target the most relevant need, address a particular level of customer awareness, and distinguish your product from the alternatives.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5f310d1a9907820c:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-13b65f3a441e1068--research:start -->
In *Breakthrough Advertising*, Eugene Schwartz offers a structured two-step process for aligning an existing product with customer needs. First, analyze your product in exhaustive detail: list its materials, technical specifications, aesthetic features, and every possible way customers might use it. For a dating app, this would include profile browsing and direct messaging, total member count, the ad-free interface, subscription price, and the possibility of using the app to build friendships as well as romantic relationships.

Second, map each product attribute to the specific customer need it satisfies, which reveals what motivates people to buy similar products. Schwartz divides customer needs into two categories:
1. **Primal needs:** Deep-rooted emotional needs shared by all customers — the desire to feel healthy, happy, accomplished, or loved. For a dating app, the primal need driving subscriptions might be the need to feel loved.
2. **Shifting needs:** Surface-level needs that fluctuate with market trends and expectations. For example, customers might expect an ad-free interface for a paid dating app only because most other paid apps offer it, creating a market-wide norm.

Finally, Schwartz recommends targeting the customer need that reaches the largest potential market in your headline. If research shows the need for love motivates more customers than the desire for an ad-free interface, the app should be framed as the best solution for finding love.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-13b65f3a441e1068--research:end -->

<a id="b-356501531480c842"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-d7f187234168"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-cc6b35533285"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-f9f56a8b4444"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-cfaa46699cc3"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-b774eba55e81"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-f0dc16243589"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-02cdc4d2a7cb"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-cc27c669f346"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-6a9a6889321c"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-e98412ef4d59"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-8b372a5a9f8e"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-84f100a2751f"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-1f5e455cd0c3"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-0f186d956528"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-d2fe732d8a6c"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-8cd4b0b09ee3"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-1ac8aed64678"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-0d8d38830436"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-4a88eca2b93f"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-3c51ec954f51"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-a3dd41adfa40"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-26673d6755d4"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-d7738f1ee781"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-7f1fba157a35"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-03546087dc4f"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-db1b4890dbd0"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-8e8a1d766a31"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-85b507511eaa"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-145e1af9813b"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-8ae4eef01812"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-8ae4eef01812-2"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-356501531480c842:start -->
### Crafting headlines around customer awareness of your product
In *Breakthrough Advertising*, Schwartz argues that once you have chosen the customer need your headline will target, you must determine how much customers already know about your product and how strongly they feel they need it. Customers move through five levels of awareness as they learn more about a product, and each level dictates how much information the headline must provide to get them to consider your pitch. He recommends identifying the awareness level of the majority of your customers and writing a headline tailored to it.

**Awareness level 1 — Customers don’t feel they need your product.** These customers do not recognize or acknowledge the need your product satisfies; they are either unaware of your product or indifferent to it. Schwartz recommends echoing an emotion or attitude they can identify with, then using the body copy to educate them on why they need the product. For a dating app: “Have you forgotten what it’s like to be in love?”

**Awareness level 2 — Customers feel a need but don’t know how to fulfill it.** These customers know they need something to satisfy the need your product addresses, but they don’t yet know of any solutions, including yours. Headlines should clearly define the need, convince customers they urgently require a solution, and present your product as the inevitable answer. For example: “Are you tired of feeling alone and unwanted? Download our app and you’ll never be single again.”

**Awareness level 3 — Customers know how they want to fulfill the need, but don’t know about your product.** These customers understand the need and have a sense of how they want to meet it, but they don’t know your product can deliver that solution. Schwartz recommends emphasizing three points: a clear definition of the need, proof that the need can be fulfilled, and an illustration of how your product fulfills it. For example: “Sick of bad dates? Sign up for [app name] where all the good ones hang out!”

**Awareness level 4 — Customers aren’t sure about your product.** These customers doubt whether your product can fulfill their needs, either because they lack information or because they’re skeptical of what they’ve seen. The headline should pursue one of five objectives:
1. Reinforce their need for your product: “Don’t waste your life waiting for the *one*.”
2. Emphasize how good life will be after purchase: “Have fun finding the love of your life.”
3. Prove your product can fulfill the need: “Sparks more dates, relationships, and marriages than any other dating app.”
4. Clarify how your product fulfills the need: “Find the perfect someone in your own city using GPS technology.”
5. Suppress doubts or concerns: “Find your match in six weeks or get a full refund.”

**Awareness level 5 — Customers want your product.** These customers already know about and want your product; they just need a nudge to complete the purchase. Since they already understand the features and benefits, the headline should focus on incentivizing the purchase. For example: “Sign up now to get 75% off!”

The dating-app headlines above are teaching examples from the local guide, not verified performance claims. “Never be single again,” “more marriages than any other app,” and similar guarantees require evidence or enforceable terms; specificity alone does not make them true. The five levels are presented here from least to most aware, following the guide’s ordering.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-356501531480c842:end -->

<a id="b-cd71aa2e598baf71"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-580b63db9ee2"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-95133ceb2991"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-f6fb34a7a491"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-1f513b6fc778"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-eeaeeefe9e73"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-94759043540b"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-a05a41456a73"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-e78b0a859cb5"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-70e131c9bf43"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-89a5cdd54923"></a>
<a id="b-7c666384b24533e6"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-b30d463c096f"></a>

**Customer Awareness Levels and Tailored Messaging**


Seth Godin (*Purple Cow*) explains why paying attention to customer awareness levels matters: knowing exactly what customers already know about your product makes it easier to understand their perspective—how they judge your product. This understanding helps you frame your content in a way that engages and educates customers. For example, customers unaware of a product’s purpose don’t understand its value, so if you show them the price up front, they might judge it as overpriced. However, when you know that customers don’t understand your product, you can sway them into perceiving it as a good deal by educating them on the product’s value before mentioning the price. [https://seths.blog/2009/11/a-new-cover-a-new-foreword-but-the-same-book/](https://seths.blog/2009/11/a-new-cover-a-new-foreword-but-the-same-book/)

<!-- atlas:block-content b-7c666384b24533e6:start -->
For customers at the first awareness level (who don’t feel they need your product), marketing experts note that for a product to create a new desire in customers, it is described by one marketing article through five characteristics: newness, surprise, intricacy, mystery, and an ability to raise questions in the customer. The iPhone is a notable example of a product that created a customer desire that hadn’t existed before: the guide uses Apple’s 2007 campaign to illustrate making an unfamiliar combination of phone and internet functions desirable. It does not establish that such capabilities or customer interest had never existed before. [https://www.ama.org/marketing-news/5-keys-to-creating-consumer-desire/](https://www.ama.org/marketing-news/5-keys-to-creating-consumer-desire/)
<!-- atlas:block-content b-7c666384b24533e6:end -->

<!-- atlas:block-content b-cd71aa2e598baf71:start -->
For customers at the second awareness level (who feel a need but don’t know how to fulfill it), marketing experts suggest that [you’ll reach more customers if you present your advertisements online as informative content](https://convertingteam.com/blog/customer-awareness-levels/). Customers often scroll through various articles and blog posts as they search for potential solutions. Brands can gain direct access to these customers by writing informative posts that provide the information they need—including relevant keywords that clarify the topic and may help discovery, without guaranteeing a high search ranking—then framing the product as the best solution and linking to its sales page.

For customers at the third awareness level (who know how they want to fulfill their need), even if you convince them to read your copy, they might not progress from knowing what they want to buying what they want. This is because customers prefer to keep their options open instead of completing transactions. The guide describes browsing as pleasurable anticipation: imagining alternatives may itself be rewarding, so interest need not immediately become a transaction. Its stronger claim that dopamine enters the bloodstream and stops at commitment is not established by the source material reviewed; it is not needed to explain the gap between browsing and buying. [https://health.clevelandclinic.org/retail-therapy-shopping-compulsion/](https://health.clevelandclinic.org/retail-therapy-shopping-compulsion/)

For customers at the fourth awareness level (who are unsure about your product), additional tactics support Schwartz’s five headline objectives:
1. **Reinforcing customer need:** Josh Kaufman (*The Personal MBA*) recommends incorporating limitations into your advertisement—for example, “While stocks last” or “Valid until midnight tonight.” These tactics reinforce need by suggesting customers will “lose out” if they don’t act immediately. [https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-personal-mba/1-page-summary#part-3-encourage-transactions](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-personal-mba/1-page-summary#part-3-encourage-transactions)
2. **Emphasizing future benefits:** Customer service experts suggest expressing enthusiasm and a genuine interest in serving customers’ needs. When customers feel you genuinely care, they’re more likely to believe you’re capable of meeting their needs. For example, change “Have fun finding the love of your life” to “We really want you to have fun finding the love of your life!” [https://nancyfriedman.com/2016/06/15/service-mentality-defined/](https://nancyfriedman.com/2016/06/15/service-mentality-defined/)
3. **Proving product efficacy:** The more evidence you provide to back up your claims, the more credible your advertisement feels. This builds trust and may allow you to charge higher prices. In one study, 71% of participants said they would prioritize buying from businesses they trusted, even if competitors offered cheaper deals. [https://www.dalecarnegie.com/blog/3-reasons-why-trust-is-the-most-important-tool-for-driving-profitable-sales/](https://www.dalecarnegie.com/blog/3-reasons-why-trust-is-the-most-important-tool-for-driving-profitable-sales/)
4. **Clarifying need fulfillment:** Brian Tracy (*The Psychology of Selling*) advises focusing on what the product does rather than what it is. Customers don’t care about features or technical specifications; they care about the end benefit. Headlines that emphasize the benefit (easily find compatible and local dates) hook more customers than headlines that describe features (GPS technology). [https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-psychology-of-selling/chapter-3#emphasize-your-offerings-key-benefits](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-psychology-of-selling/chapter-3#emphasize-your-offerings-key-benefits)
5. **Suppressing doubts:** Customers often hesitate due to loss aversion—the cognitive bias of worrying more about potential losses than potential gains. They focus more on money they might lose if the product fails than on benefits if it succeeds. The suggested samples and trials let customers learn about the product with less exposure to specified losses. A discount reduces the price; it is not a risk-free way to learn or a remedy for every possible loss. [https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/loss-aversion](https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/loss-aversion)

For customers at the fifth awareness level (who want your product), marketing experts refer to the motivational strategy used here as a call to action (CTA). An effective CTA starts with a command verb, uses words that provoke an emotional response, and provides a compelling reason to act. For example: “Sign up today and get 50% off your dream vacation.” [https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/10/09/call-to-action#:~:text=In%20marketing%2C%20your%20call%20to,action%20is%20%E2%80%9CBuy%20now!%E2%80%9D](https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/10/09/call-to-action#:~:text=In%20marketing%2C%20your%20call%20to,action%20is%20%E2%80%9CBuy%20now!%E2%80%9D)

*References: [The Personal MBA](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-personal-mba) · [The Psychology of Selling](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-psychology-of-selling) · [Purple Cow](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/purple-cow)*

These tactics address possible objections, not universal buyer motives. Scarcity and deadlines must be real. The source’s 71% trust preference is a reported survey response, not proof that trust causes that sales uplift.

Naming a desire in a BrandScript does not guarantee that the audience shares it; use the novelty example to generate a hypothesis, then check the actual response.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-cd71aa2e598baf71:end -->

<a id="b-c6639616d21fc019"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-7ba18a846c82"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-7d14012daee6"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-4efe29199061"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-eb5188d76d2b"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-5041d1fb41c4"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-c47ccb083432"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-d9a562f6f8c1"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-06d08407b903"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-01e8c45b9992"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-a2d1e095581d"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-c6639616d21fc019:start -->
### Headline differentiation based on awareness of competitors
Schwartz’s third research area for headline writing is customer awareness of competitive products. Once you know what customers want and how aware they are of your product, you must assess how aware they are of competing offerings, because this determines how much emphasis to place on differentiation. His advice is tailored to two groups:

**Customers unaware of competitive products.** If customers don’t know about similar versions of your product, your headline should be as simple and direct as possible. For example: “Finally, an effortless way to find love!”

**Customers aware of competitive products.** Schwartz’s guidance here varies by how many competing products customers know. If they are aware of only a few similar products, he recommends expanding on your competitors’ headlines to explain why your product is better, rather than inventing an entirely new headline. For example, if a competitor uses “An easy way to find love,” you can answer with: “The fastest and easiest way to find love.”

If customers are aware of many versions of your product, they will be less receptive to new advertisements — they’ve heard all the claims and have lost interest. Schwartz suggests two ways to revive interest:
1. Emphasize a new, distinct benefit that sets your product apart from the market. For example: “The only app to guarantee your perfect match in under 60 seconds!”
2. Express an emotion or attitude that resonates. For example: “For those who know that life should be better.”

Competitive sophistication is a separate axis from awareness of your own product: a buyer can understand the category well while never having heard of your brand. “Fastest,” “only,” and “perfect match in 60 seconds” remain unverified example copy, not claims a business may assume it can substantiate.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c6639616d21fc019:end -->

<a id="b-9dd70bae251850fd"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-653af9091d1d"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-296be9207d30"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-6028be249a85"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-67b30b8e7580"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-2f4e419600ee"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-9dd70bae251850fd:start -->
**Competitor Awareness and First-Mover Brand Advantage**


While Schwartz’s headline strategies for competitor-aware customers may help distinguish your product, they are unlikely to change how customers feel about the first competing product they learned about. According to Al Ries and Jack Trout (*[The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing/)*), when consumers learn about a new product, they unconsciously perceive the brand that first introduced the product as synonymous with the product itself. For example, people often refer to tissues as Kleenex because Kleenex was the first brand to offer facial tissues. This form of attachment makes it difficult for new brands to change how customers feel about established brands with existing products—even if the new brands offer superior products.

Schwartz implies that having no competition makes it easier to attract customers. While there’s some truth to the claim, William M. Luther (*[The Marketing Plan](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-marketing-plan)*) warns that marketing a product with no competition involves higher costs. Customers rely on products already in the market to provide the context they need to understand a product’s benefits; without that context, they have no interest in the product. Businesses must therefore focus their marketing efforts on educating customers about why they should want the product before they can sell it, resulting in higher costs, since existing competitors would have already educated customers and built demand. [https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-marketing-plan/1-page-summary#life-cycle-stage-1-introductory](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-marketing-plan/1-page-summary#life-cycle-stage-1-introductory)
<!-- atlas:block-content b-9dd70bae251850fd:end -->

> **Editorial correction:** The source note calls this book *The 21 Immutable Laws of Marketing*, but its link points to [*The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing*](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing/). The linked book’s own note confirms that title. The argument and Marlboro example above are retained from the source.

<a id="b-b6fdc44b14243171"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-3aeb26db1f1b"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-b9e7101ce735"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-b6fdc44b14243171:start -->
### Four ways the guide develops body copy
The guide groups the following advice into four strategies: intensify the need, explain the mechanism, offer relevant endorsements, and distinguish the alternative. They develop the headline’s promise rather than introducing an unrelated message.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b6fdc44b14243171:end -->

<a id="b-0ba57f8e9710b11f"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-95d0ff0726c1"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-0ac07beaf1e9"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-21f992856c28"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-0ba57f8e9710b11f:start -->
### Copy strategy: evoke aspirations by highlighting a gap
The first of Schwartz’s four strategies is to evoke customers’ aspirations: consider the type of person your customers want to be or the lifestyle they want to lead, convince them that they are currently unlike that aspirational self because they are missing something, then show how your product will help them feel, become, or appear more like the person they dream of being. This works because provoking a sense of dissatisfaction primes customers to actively seek a solution, making it easier to position your product as the missing piece that can “fix” them or enable their transformation. For example, you might write, “Aren’t you sick of always being the single one at parties?” and follow with, “With this app, you’ll easily find someone that makes your friends jealous!”

An aspiration gap can name a real, chosen goal; it can also be manufactured through shame or jealousy. The dating example illustrates emotional contrast, not permission to invent defects in someone’s life or promise that a purchase guarantees intimacy.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-0ba57f8e9710b11f:end -->

<a id="b-56deb9106ff2490c"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-a33c68359963"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-d14af6dd0fff"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-56deb9106ff2490c:start -->
### 2. Explain how the product meets the need
Use the product inventory—materials, technical specifications, appearance, and possible uses—to connect a feature to a relevant benefit. The guide’s dating-app example says, “Our unique algorithm ensures that every match is compatible.” Its purpose is to move from a promise to a proposed mechanism, but naming an algorithm does not prove compatibility, and “every match” is an unsupported guarantee. Actual copy must explain what the mechanism does and support the performance claimed.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-56deb9106ff2490c:end -->

<a id="b-3f515a3aa2c03437"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-798852f826fc"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-ed2c3a3e2eef"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-3f515a3aa2c03437:start -->
### Copy strategy: use endorsements as social proof
Schwartz’s third copy strategy is to use endorsements to prove your product’s effectiveness. Include recommendations from professional experts, testimonials from satisfied customers, or celebrity endorsements. These act as external validators and social proof that convince skeptical customers your product can fulfill their unmet needs. For example, “[Celebrity] found the love of her life through our app and she couldn’t be happier.”

An endorsement proves only what the endorser can actually attest to. Expert authority, an ordinary user’s experience, and a celebrity’s visibility are different forms of support; none makes an unsupported result true. Identify material relationships rather than presenting paid advocacy as independent experience.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-3f515a3aa2c03437:end -->

<a id="b-f050f5b78c66a587"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-a4e666612799"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-e959a64a711c"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-f050f5b78c66a587:start -->
### Copy strategy: demonstrate a relevant advantage
Schwartz’s fourth strategy is to distinguish the offer from competitors. A buyer familiar with alternatives needs help comparing meaningful differences: identify a weakness in an alternative and explain how your product addresses it. The guide illustrates the approach with hypothetical dating-app copy: “Unlike other apps, we make sure user profiles are accurate so that you always know who you’re meeting.” This demonstrates a claimed advantage in profile verification, not an established safety or identity guarantee. Actual verification can have limits and cannot guarantee the identity encountered at every meeting; copy must reflect the checks and evidence the service really has.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-f050f5b78c66a587:end -->

<a id="b-33796ca84726955e"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-ad629ad189a3"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-33796ca84726955e:start -->
**Presenting product features as proof of effectiveness**

Brian Tracy (*The Psychology of Selling*) adds two practical tips for presenting product features as proof of effectiveness. First, introduce features one at a time to avoid overwhelming the customer with information. Second, use a three-part structure: “Because of (feature), you can (benefit), which means (relevance).” This links the feature to its benefit and then connects that benefit to the customer’s life. For example, “Thanks to our unique algorithm (feature), you’ll only see profiles for compatible matches (benefit). This means you won’t waste any time finding your perfect match (relevance).”

*References: [The Psychology of Selling](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-psychology-of-selling/1-page-summary) · [two pieces of advice for presenting product features as proof of a product’s effectiveness](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-psychology-of-selling/chapter-3#3-show-tell-ask)*

The dating-algorithm sequence here demonstrates feature → benefit → relevance. Any claim that it guarantees compatibility needs its own evidence; the explanatory sequence cannot supply that evidence.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-33796ca84726955e:end -->

<a id="b-b54b89a8762cb54e"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-fd58a7063614"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-b54b89a8762cb54e:start -->
**Negative stakes and comparative advertising**

One practical way to highlight negative stakes is through comparative advertising — that is, comparing your brand to lesser competitor brands that the customer should avoid. In this framing, the inferior competing brand is the negative consequence to steer clear of. For this tactic to be ethical, your claims must be objective (“market-leading” counts as objective, while “best” does not), you must compare your offering to brands that serve the same purpose so the comparison is fair, and any claims must be verifiable, with clear indication of the information they are based on and where customers can find it.

*References: [compare your brand to lesser competitor brands the customer should avoid](https://www.asa.org.uk/news/a-quick-guide-to-comparative-advertising.html#:~:text=Comparative%20advertising%20can%20be%20a,know%20what%20the%20rules%20are.)*

“Market-leading” becomes objective only after specifying the metric, category, geography, and period and having evidence for them. “Best” can also refer to a defined test; neither word makes a claim verifiable on its own. Use the comparison to illuminate a relevant difference, not to borrow certainty from a label.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b54b89a8762cb54e:end -->

<a id="b-8f1b55ee37e38a2e"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-ed2a26bd4b4c"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-888c0ab633a8"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-aa909b3361c4"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-89f749c5d468"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-9819fa473713"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-8f1b55ee37e38a2e:start -->
**Motivating customers through discomfort and transformation**


Josh Kaufman (*The Personal MBA*) explains why provoking dissatisfaction makes customers more receptive to a product: even when people want to improve something in their lives, they only open up to solutions if they feel uncomfortable with their current situation. The core psychological driver is that people are more motivated to move *away from discomfort* than they are to move *toward comfort*. If they feel satisfied as they are, they will not be driven to buy products that promise to change their lives; but if you stir up feelings of dissatisfaction or unease, you motivate them to seek relief by purchasing your product.

Chris Guillebeau (*The $100 Startup*) frames customer transformation from a product-creation rather than marketing perspective: he recommends designing products so that customers feel superior after using them. Just as marketers should think about how to *explain* a product’s transformative power, product designers should think about how to *make* products that actually transform people. He goes further by advising that, beyond showing customers the positive outcome of buying, you should focus on the *experience* of that positive outcome rather than on specific product attributes that carry less emotional weight. The guide’s hypothetical bone-supplement example contrasts the experience of being active and free with the functional description “better hip mobility.” It illustrates experience versus attribute; neither the health effect nor that experience is established merely by this example. Product claims need support before becoming a promised outcome.

William M. Luther (*The Marketing Plan*) suggests going beyond product superiority to also emphasize what your *business* does better than competitors. This helps differentiate both your product and your company in a way that appeals to customers. To do this, think about how you want customers to perceive your business and what will make them choose you over others. For example, brands targeting eco-conscious customers highlight how much they donate to environmental programs, implying they are more environmentally responsible than other businesses and that they care more about what matters to their customers.

Ken Blanchard and Sheldon Bowles (*Raving Fans*) offer a practical method for uncovering what customers truly value, which underpins all of the above strategies: when interviewing customers or prospects face to face, pay as much attention to silences and omissions as to what they actually say, because those gaps often reveal more about what customers really want or mean.

*References: [The Personal MBA](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-personal-mba/1-page-summary) · [they’re only receptive to products that claim to help them if they’re uncomfortable with their current situation](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-personal-mba/1-page-summary#people-want-to-fulfill-their-basic-needs) · [The $100 Startup](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-100-startup) · [designing your product so that customers feel superior after using it](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-100-startup/part-1#three-strategies-to-create-a-positive-experience-around-your-product) · [focusing on the experience of the positive outcome](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-100-startup/part-1#create-a-positive-customer-experience) · [The Marketing Plan](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-marketing-plan/1-page-summary) · [differentiate both your product and your business in a way that appeals to customers](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/the-marketing-plan/1-page-summary#establish-your-position-in-the-market-through-differentiation) · [Raving Fans](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/raving-fans) · [pay attention to silences and omissions](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/raving-fans/step-2#find-out-what-your-external-customers-want)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-8f1b55ee37e38a2e:end -->

<a id="b-8ad237d6dedb0391"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-83dd09d555ad"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-8ad237d6dedb0391:start -->
**Marketing psychology has a history, not a single starting date**

Shortform cites Ernest Dichter and David McClelland to illustrate work on consumer motives and how people process marketing information. Its claim that such inquiry only began in the 1960s and 1970s is not established by the material reviewed here. Retain the named researchers as historical context, without treating that period as the origin of marketing psychology.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-8ad237d6dedb0391:end -->

<a id="b-5f83518f062398b0"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-433560f1a592"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-6d14a640d035"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-f4acdebd9ebc"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5f83518f062398b0:start -->
**Attention and expectations need separate evidence**

A headline has to earn attention, but there is no validated universal 8.25-second deadline. King’s College London researchers describe the familiar eight-second attention-span claim as a myth; their survey concerns public beliefs, not a replacement biological limit. [King’s College London](https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/are-attention-spans-really-collapsing-data-shows-uk-public-are-worried-but-also-see-benefits-from-technology)

Shortform uses Duhigg’s *The Power of Habit* to explain selective attention: routines reduce the need to consciously process everything, so people often skim past irrelevant advertisements. Its “more than 40% of daily decisions and behaviors” figure belongs to that secondary habit discussion; it is not a measured share of advertising responses. A separate account of headline framing says that headlines direct attention toward particular details, create expectations about the text, and can shape what readers later remember. Neither mechanism requires a fixed attention stopwatch.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5f83518f062398b0:end -->

<a id="theme-storybrand"></a>

## Write one complete BrandScript, then use it

<a id="b-45b118c5ee8ae1c5"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-0380f3db5d9e"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-23e78b34e045"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-3e75bd2ecd8d"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-a88171f77ffb"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-5e89ded14e8d"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-c6d2bb298edb"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-c2e50bd31d86"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-9f1fb242d400"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-a2c5eabf93d6"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-45b118c5ee8ae1c5:start -->
### Why Miller organizes a message as a story
Donald Miller identifies two recurring marketing errors: failing to show how an offer helps customers survive or prosper, and making them work too hard to understand it. His examples of survival include food, shelter, and community; prosperity includes self-esteem, purpose, and self-actualization. He describes irrelevant complexity as wasting mental energy or “calories.” Treat this as his persuasive model for editing messages, not a demonstrated neurological rule that people attend only to survival claims.

Story structure, he argues, makes the customer’s desired result and the brand’s contribution easier to understand while removing distracting information. The practical editing question is what the reader needs to understand and decide, not how many facts can be removed regardless of their importance.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-45b118c5ee8ae1c5:end -->

<a id="b-f89001d7ab25d207"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-de513afb6b49"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-a3dc7d0313c9"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-6eee9d3aa227"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-e2d5d358057a"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-74737fd01f09"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-17e5e930bec3"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-a794dd2c49f3"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-91a4206accea"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-9bcb2762fed4"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-881afead1b16"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-f89001d7ab25d207:start -->
### The StoryBrand 7-Part Framework and BrandScript

In *Building a StoryBrand*, marketing expert Donald Miller argues that the most effective marketing messaging is built by plugging a brand’s details into a story structure that casts the customer as the protagonist and shows how the brand helps them reach their story’s happy ending. Miller devised his own story formula — the [StoryBrand 7-Part Framework](https://www.mystorybrand.com/) — a simplified version of the structure common in commercial films. By filling in a company’s details, you create a BrandScript: a document that tells the story of how your brand helps customers achieve their goals. You then draw from this BrandScript to craft every piece of marketing collateral, resulting in cohesive, concise, clear marketing that resonates with customers.

Miller identifies three key benefits of using the StoryBrand framework:
1. **Ease of use**: Simply plug your company’s details into the outline to build your BrandScript.
2. **Cohesiveness**: It produces a single core message that you can adapt for different products, services, or divisions, eliminating contradictions across marketing materials and reducing customer confusion about what you do.
3. **Repeatability**: Once the message is defined, you can communicate it consistently across every marketing platform and also share it with your employees.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-f89001d7ab25d207:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-6637c06eceb3a92f--want:start -->
### 1. A customer wants something

Miller’s first story element makes the customer the protagonist and names what that person wants. A gap between an expressed or confirmed goal and the present situation can explain why change matters. The guide imagines a homeowner who wants a landscaped backyard: comparing the unplanted yard with that desired result may give them a reason to explore landscaping services. The homeowner must confirm the desire; telling someone what they want does not establish it or guarantee action.

Miller adds that the want you highlight must be tied to staying alive or prospering, since showing how your brand enables survival or prosperity is critical to any successful marketing campaign. He lists six core wants that drive survival and prosperity:
- **Save or acquire money** — money pays for survival resources like food.
- **Save time** — freed-up time can be devoted to survival-related activities.
- **Build community** — community supports survival by providing allies, and supports prosperity through mutual nurturing.
- **Acquire status** — status aids survival by deterring enemies and attracting allies and mates, and supports prosperity through social standing.
- **Create opportunities to be generous** — generosity fosters prosperity by making people more likable (strengthening relationships) and by giving life meaning through helping others.
- **Find meaning** — a brand can fulfill this key need by letting customers feel part of something larger than themselves.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-6637c06eceb3a92f--want:end -->

<a id="b-a1972fd424165152"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-267f76663f59"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-128b4cdfb6d6"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-160ef92d1249"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-e84449a64eb3"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-89ea847bd8b7"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-2d5973adb2af"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-a1972fd424165152:start -->
### 2. A problem stands in the way

Part 2 introduces the problem the customer-protagonist encounters: without a problem or conflict, customers lose interest in the narrative, and the more specific and realistic the problem, the more emotionally invested customers become because they see themselves reflected in the brand. Miller advises making the problem easy to grasp by presenting or personifying it as a villain — for example, casting long grocery store lines as the villain that an online grocery delivery service defeats.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-a1972fd424165152:end -->

<a id="b-905dce60b47d8360"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-dcb9b0da48ab"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-0a111f1add44"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-7134b3d35a98"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-eea7674150d6"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-12c0fa73edd1"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-905dce60b47d8360:start -->
**Three Levels of Customer Problems to Address in Story Copy**

Miller identifies three levels of customer problems that strong stories address: external, internal, and philosophical. External problems are tangible and the easiest for brands to identify and solve—for example, long lines at grocery stores. Internal problems are unpleasant states such as frustration or doubt that the customer wants to escape; they motivate action more strongly than external problems but are harder for brands to spot. For grocery-store lines, the internal problem might be: “I never have enough time to do everything I need to do each day.” Philosophical problems are universal human concerns, often about meaning or justice, and are usually expressed with “should” statements. Here, they might sound like: “Life shouldn’t just be about work and chores. I should have time for friends and fun, too.”

To build an exceptional story, show how your product or service resolves the customer’s problem on all three levels. A grocery-delivery service, for instance, solves the external problem of waiting in line, the internal frustration of not having enough time for chores, and the philosophical problem of restoring the balance life should have.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-905dce60b47d8360:end -->

<a id="b-ee2f786adb03ecbc"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-199ab3d87d9b"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-d943c4c4d7f6"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-0738342c2b3b"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-31454a7f8424"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-42e90bfa910c"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-34b815cd6dbe"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-7c6eb0cab075"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-67a950375f43"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-9c7f25bd2fac"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-0f9d1176252c"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-3e72dfae62e7"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-083aae5402cc"></a>
<a id="b-6cf5a7ad3ce9aa9b"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-9c027b13cf16"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-d894c78ecfae"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-bffbf9535949"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-6cf5a7ad3ce9aa9b:start -->
### 3. The brand becomes a credible guide

In Miller’s seven-part StoryBrand framework, the brand does not take the lead role — it acts as the mentor who helps the customer-protagonist overcome their problem. A credible mentor has two key qualities.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-6cf5a7ad3ce9aa9b:end -->

<!-- atlas:block-content b-ee2f786adb03ecbc:start -->
The first is **compassion**: show that you understand your customer’s problem — even that you share the same problem — and communicate that you want to help. This compassion fosters trust in the brand.

The second is **competence**: demonstrate that you have mentored others before, because a strong track record builds trust. Miller recommends displaying customer testimonials in marketing materials as one way to establish competence.

The mentor’s experience can also encourage a protagonist who doubts their ability to overcome the obstacle; competence and empathy make that encouragement credible.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-ee2f786adb03ecbc:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-ee2f786adb03ecbc--plan:start -->
### 4. Give the customer a plan

Once positioned as a mentor, the brand presents the customer with a step-by-step plan to overcome their problem — specifically, a plan to purchase and implement the product or service. Confusion and fear can make buying harder; a clear plan can lower some of the effort and uncertainty involved, without removing every concern. Miller outlines two types of plans:

**Instructional plans** walk customers through the concrete steps to purchase a product, implement it after purchase, or a blend of both. Their purpose is to reduce customer confusion about how to buy or use the product. Miller recommends including three to six steps and communicating the plan in marketing materials. For a meal kit company, an instructional plan might be: “Step 1: Log into our website and customize your meal kit. Step 2: Receive and unpackage your meal kit. Step 3: Cook delicious meals for your family.”

**Promise plans**, by contrast, list the promises you make to customers about how you will do business. They reduce the perceived risk and fear of buying. A meal kit company’s promise plan might be: “You’ll only receive food that’s locally sourced. You’ll be able to responsibly recycle our packaging. If you’re not satisfied with our product, we guarantee your money back.”
<!-- atlas:block-content b-ee2f786adb03ecbc--plan:end -->

<a id="b-df8cdb3ad6a6f3ed"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-5baf22fd6cc4"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-0176e411109d"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-a6a690a8fcb6"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-44a07da5cb24"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-5f81596e71dc"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-4f36222f0579"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-064528ab0d78"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-69cf45d54a1f"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-65a841f6792c"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-af066bb5dd24"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-df8cdb3ad6a6f3ed:start -->
### 5. Invite a concrete action

After laying out how the customer can solve their problem with the product, the brand must call the customer to action. Miller stresses that customers will not know what you want them to do — purchase your product or service — unless you tell them explicitly and repeatedly. He urges marketers not to fear appearing insistent or too bold: repetition and boldness signal confidence in the product, and customers generally choose the brand that is clear about what it wants them to do. Miller identifies two types of calls to action: calls to buy and calls to engage.

A **call to buy** leads directly to a purchase or is the first step toward one. These are unambiguous, direct calls such as “Buy Now!,” “Schedule a Consultation,” or “Apply Now.” Miller stresses that brands should not be afraid to ask for the business they want. To draw attention to a call to buy on a website or in marketing materials, he recommends: placing the “Buy Now!” or similar button in the top right corner of the website at all times; using a different color, font, or size for the call-to-buy button; and incorporating the call to buy into every piece of marketing material.

A **call to engage** offers customers helpful information that positions the brand as a competent mentor. It does not directly funnel customers toward a sale; instead, it establishes the brand as worthy in the customer’s mind so they will think of it when they need the product. Examples include an educational PDF or video series, a product sample, or a test run.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-df8cdb3ad6a6f3ed:end -->

<a id="b-ada231e76e75d32d"></a>
<a id="u-this-is-marketing-82a906586cd9"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-833878e1513b"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-ada231e76e75d32d:start -->
### 6. Explain what inaction could cost

Part 6, the negative stakes of not taking action, spells out what is at stake if the customer does not act. Without negative consequences for inaction, customers will not feel compelled to buy. For example, telling customers that chiropractic care improves posture is not enough on its own; you also need to explain that poor posture can lead to back problems to create enough urgency to act. Miller emphasizes that you should elicit only a moderate amount of anxiety about these negative stakes. Overplaying them — for example, claiming “You’ll damage your back irreparably without my services!” — will repel customers, while underplaying them — “There’s a small chance your back might hurt occasionally without my services” — will not generate enough urge to buy.

The chiropractic example is an illustration of message intensity, not medical evidence that a reader needs a particular service. Both the consequence and the claimed remedy must be supported; creating more anxiety cannot supply missing evidence.

Shortform connects this calibrated-pressure principle to stress more generally: moderate stress can improve focus and motivation, excessive stress can destroy motivation and create overwhelm, and no stress at all can leave people without enough drive to act.

The stress analogy is Shortform’s extension, not a formula for a uniform optimal pressure level. The customer must be free to judge the stakes and decline.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-ada231e76e75d32d:end -->

<a id="b-8304f71edae74aa4"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-0d681af09ceb"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-924b16bfd074"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-606c30ef4e86"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-8304f71edae74aa4:start -->
### 7. Show a specific, simple success

In the final, most important part of Miller’s StoryBrand marketing outline, you must show the specific, simple, positive outcome — the happy ending — of buying your product. Customers will not understand how your product improves their lives unless you show them. Miller advises being specific and simple, because vague, complex positive outcomes are hard for customers to desire. For example, to advertise a bone-strengthening supplement, don’t write “these supplements will improve your life” (vague); instead write “supplements to make you feel 10 years younger” (specific). Similarly, don’t explain how stronger bones will lower health insurance premiums (complex); instead show people moving easily and enjoying life (simple).

The supplement examples illustrate specificity versus vagueness and an experienced outcome versus technical detail. They do not substantiate health effects or a “10 years younger” promise; use only outcomes the product can support.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-8304f71edae74aa4:end -->

<a id="b-708f467068b5785d"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-aaa0361694c1"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-595c10639361"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-5acbfddfff8a"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-a20cefcf274f"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-5cfee6e4e755"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-708f467068b5785d:start -->
### The transformation runs through the whole story

Miller places customer transformation at the heart of marketing. The strongest motivator of human behavior, he argues, is the desire to become a better version of yourself. If you position your brand as an enabler of that transformation, you become more than just a brand — you become a way of life.

To understand what your customers want to transform into, identify their **aspirational identity**: the way they would like to see themselves. For example, if you run exercise boot camps, your customers’ aspirational identity is someone fit and rugged.

Once customers have joined your story by buying your product, mark when they have achieved their desired transformation — for instance, after a certain number of months, reward a customer’s transformation into a fit, rugged person with a free class or a social media shout-out.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-708f467068b5785d:end -->

<a id="b-5c88e103bd42618e"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-372fa9b5e7d7"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-9ff9433c8cd5"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5c88e103bd42618e:start -->
**Miller’s selected wants and the Maslow comparison**

Shortform relates Miller’s list to Maslow’s hierarchy: basic food, shelter, and rest, followed in that model by security, love and acceptance, esteem, and fulfillment. Miller does not list love and acceptance separately, but community already covers part of that territory. Shortform suggests beauty and personal-care messages can speak to desirability. Its Old Spice example presents an attractive, polished male ideal and associates body wash with that image. The mechanism is identification with an ideal, not evidence that the product makes someone loved.

Shortform also imagines Sharp agreeing that broad human needs can inform a message. That is a cross-book hypothesis, not Sharp’s documented endorsement of Miller’s survival model. Overlap among category buyers does not mean nearly every brand can sell to every human being or that universal-needs copy maximizes returns. Real buying occasions, functional fit, reach costs, and the authors’ competing budget priorities still matter.

*References: [humans first are driven to address basic survival needs](https://www.masterclass.com/articles/a-guide-to-the-5-levels-of-maslows-hierarchy-of-needs#what-are-the-5-levels-of-maslows-hierarchy-of-needs) · [popular Old Spice commercial](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owGykVbfgUE) · [How Brands Grow](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/how-brands-grow/)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5c88e103bd42618e:end -->

<a id="b-e29a092cde972f78"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-ca7e9a82cb77"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-e29a092cde972f78:start -->
**Self-improvement as a marketing driver and generational differences**

Miller claims all humans are inherently interested in self-improvement, but research shows that commitment to self-betterment varies by generation. Millennials are more interested in self-improvement than previous generations, possibly because their basic needs have generally always been met, leaving more mental space for complex concerns, or because their self-expectations are higher, as some research suggests.

*References: [Millennials are more interested than previous generations in self-improvement](https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/the-gen-y-guide/201705/why-millennials-are-obsessed-self-improvement)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-e29a092cde972f78:end -->

<a id="b-3d86e7ecad8e2c80"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-31378fa04bd3"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-5b67dfbc0d47"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-3d86e7ecad8e2c80:start -->
**Ask about deeper problems; a story does not prove a remedy**

Shortform combines Miller’s external, internal, and philosophical problem levels with Pink’s advice to ask thoughtful questions in personal selling. A software customer might report bugs, leave the frustration of interrupted work unstated, and also believe that a service should keep its promises. Questions can reveal those distinct layers; the three-level classification belongs to Miller, while this connection between the authors is Shortform’s.

Shortform also imagines Godin answering that a story becomes true when customers believe it. Keep the narrower insight that stories can change interpretation and felt experience. Believing a narrative does not repair buggy software or demonstrate that a product resolves an external problem. The ethical disagreement about beneficial “fibs” and manufactured dissatisfaction therefore remains substantive.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-3d86e7ecad8e2c80:end -->

<a id="b-c060fb7272d3fd69"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-6940abcb8af9"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-f1b1857941f6"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-4da07052e561"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-1d2b19040260"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-7e8eaceb6703"></a>
<a id="u-breakthrough-advertising-056d53af194c"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-d84dcb953e61"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-140552461d35"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-080a48532281"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-3a40876d1d54"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-c060fb7272d3fd69:start -->
**Compassionate brand positioning and the mentor role**

Shortform frames Miller’s step of identifying a real customer problem as an act of compassionate marketing: by demonstrating that your brand fully understands the customer’s struggles and can help resolve them, you extend compassion, which feels good to the customer and draws them into the narrative. Shortform illustrates compassionate positioning with the example of Postmates’ 2018 Los Angeles campaign. The company began with thorough market research, tracking ordering trends across LA neighborhoods over time to understand its customers. It then created a campaign highlighting specific, relatable problems Los Angelenos faced—such as wanting an açaí bowl but not knowing how to pronounce it—followed by the tagline “we get it,” signaling that Postmates understood the customer and would fetch the product for them.

Beyond storytelling, the mentor role resonates in real life as well: mentors boost mentees’ chances of success by contributing knowledge and experience that would take the mentee years to acquire alone, can expand the mentee’s network through their connections, and can simply raise their confidence.

Miller’s use of personified villains also aligns with a well-documented human tendency to personify objects from early childhood; in adults, personification can reduce the emotional impact of loneliness.

*References: [showing compassion toward your customer](https://moz.com/blog/empathetic-marketing) · [campaign featuring specific problems Los Angelenos faced](https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/we-get-it-postmates-launches-first-360-brand-campaign-300587465.html) · [contributing valuable knowledge and experience](https://www.radicalcandor.com/7-reasons-mentorship-career/#:~:text=Mentors%20raise%20your%20confidence%20and,overall%20increase%20in%20emotional%20health.) · [humans' general tendency to personify objects from an early stage in life](https://daily.jstor.org/personification-is-your-friend-the-amazing-life-of-letters/#:~:text=Studies%20have%20shown%20that%20the,intentions%20and%20emotions%20to%20them.)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c060fb7272d3fd69:end -->

<a id="b-5aeb83f911eccfd2"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-7f865e092439"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-ee3b16280b5b"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-28ce9640163c"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5aeb83f911eccfd2:start -->
**Plans that reduce customer risk and confusion**


Shortform extends Miller’s point about plans reducing customer confusion by noting that step-by-step plans also help salespeople. Mike Weinberg, author of *New Sales. Simplified*, argues that in face-to-face sales calls, salespeople must come prepared with a plan rather than improvising, to avoid losing the customer’s attention on confusing or irrelevant tangents and to stay in control. Weinberg outlines eight specific stages of a strong sales call, beginning with building rapport and ending with setting next steps.

Miller’s emphasis on simplicity and clarity also aligns with broader marketing advice: reducing ambiguity and complexity around a product increases the chance of a sale, whether by paring down product selection, pricing, or features, or by simplifying store or website layouts to make buying easier.

Shortform notes that service guarantees can be harder to design than product guarantees. A service often cannot undo an experience already lived, although work may be repeated or supplemented. Its three examples—vouchers for future service, a refund, or paying another company to provide a remedy—cover agreed losses rather than all risk. Some customers may value that protection enough to pay a premium upfront; that preference and the business’s ability to deliver the remedy must be tested, not assumed.

*References: [New Sales. Simplified](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/new-sales-simplified) · [salespeople must come prepared with a plan](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/new-sales-simplified/chapters-10-11#preparing-for-the-face-to-face-call) · [eight specific stages of a good sales call](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/new-sales-simplified/chapters-10-11#the-stages-of-a-sales-call) · [paring down your product selection, pricing, or features](https://hbr.org/2021/05/4-strategies-to-simplify-the-customer-journey#:~:text=sales%20and%20marketing%20efforts%20to%20make,simplicity%20throughout%20your%20customer) · [service-centered companies can get creative when thinking of ways to guarantee customer satisfaction](https://hbr.org/1988/07/the-power-of-unconditional-service-guarantees#:~:text=promises%20to%20eliminate%20them%20entirely.%20Its,pests%20on%20your%20premises%20have%20been)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5aeb83f911eccfd2:end -->

<a id="b-fbc71b7e9d55c9b4"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-c39240761427"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-fbc71b7e9d55c9b4:start -->
**Simplify the decision without hiding what matters**

Shortform connects Miller to Malcolm Gladwell’s *Blink*, which discusses fast judgments made with limited information. Some trained judgments can work with fewer relevant cues; that does not establish that less information generally produces a better purchase decision. Remove irrelevant complexity while keeping price, material limitations, risks, and the information needed to compare alternatives. “Easy to understand” is a useful editorial goal; “too little information to question the offer” is not.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fbc71b7e9d55c9b4:end -->

<a id="b-4d99a3753ea28eb9"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-069bf1b9eebf"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-4d99a3753ea28eb9:start -->
**Story discipline: cutting what doesn’t serve the narrative**

Shortform observes that while all good stories should focus on how a protagonist learns to survive or prosper and should avoid unrelated scenes, even experienced writers sometimes fall into the trap of keeping scenes they like that don’t serve the overall narrative. Both writers and marketers in this position must “kill their darlings”: writers cut redundant lines or clever asides that don’t move the story forward, and marketers cut copy that sounds nice but doesn’t tell the customer how the brand helps them survive or prosper.

*References: [Both writers and marketers in such cases must “kill their darlings](https://www.masterclass.com/articles/what-does-it-mean-to-kill-your-darlings#quiz-0)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-4d99a3753ea28eb9:end -->

<a id="b-f286731dfd528d62"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-b7bbed87866f"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-f286731dfd528d62:start -->
**The tradeoff between cohesive and flexible marketing messaging**

Shortform notes that while Miller frames ease of use, cohesiveness, and repeatability as clear advantages, they also point to a potential drawback: the method is not very flexible. A single, easily repeatable marketing message makes it harder to reposition or reframe a brand for different markets and audiences, so a company with a more flexible marketing strategy may gain a competitive edge by shifting its messaging to appeal to different groups. Miller, however, would likely counter that greater marketing flexibility comes at the cost of cohesiveness across markets and audiences — meaning companies may have to choose between the two.

*References: [company with a flexible marketing strategy may have a competitive advantage](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40171-015-0097-x#:~:text=Literature%20says%20that%20marketing%20flexibility,within%20existing%20and%20new%20markets.)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-f286731dfd528d62:end -->

<!-- atlas:block-content b-6a834692674e1940:start -->
The proposed Miller reply here is Shortform’s hypothetical cross-book comparison. A stable promise and recognizable assets can coexist with wording adapted to an audience; when the adaptation changes the promise itself, the tension is real and must be resolved deliberately.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-6a834692674e1940:end -->

<a id="b-fe08df3b3391de7a"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-07797f52b349"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-0db15727d18e"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-13216daab3a1"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-9481d1c6780f"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-6e05bf2c3cf9"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-88069f95d4cd"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-ceecee56c452"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-1963675287f4"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-fea0bf178797"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-e7efa6841542"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-f721f48378a9"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-46cd3e3e2db9"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe08df3b3391de7a:start -->
### Implementing the BrandScript Across Marketing Channels

Once you have built your BrandScript, Miller advises transferring its ideas and content directly into your marketing materials: the more you implement your BrandScript in your marketing, the more customers will sign up to star in your story. He recommends implementing your BrandScript across channels in several concrete ways.

**Overhaul your website.** Your website, a core marketing asset, should contain only the minimum information needed to convince customers you have the solution they want and are trustworthy. Every image, idea, and word should flow from your BrandScript, and anything off-message should be removed.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe08df3b3391de7a:end -->

<a id="b-b67a4b7a625ad165"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-3a7203285fb8"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-2817af9f66e2"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-a89016b797ce"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-b67a4b7a625ad165:start -->
### The brand logline: distill the story into one repeatable sentence
Miller also recommends writing a brand logline: a short, repeatable phrase or sentence that answers the question “What does your company do?” A logline draws on four storyline elements: the customer-protagonist, the problem, the plan, and the happy ending. For a line of herbal teas, an example logline might be: “Find serenity in your hectic workday with our customizable, pre-packaged tea blends.” Here, the customer is a busy office worker, the problem is a hectic workday, the plan is using easy, hassle-free pre-packaged blends, and the happy ending is finding serenity.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b67a4b7a625ad165:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe08df3b3391de7a--email:start -->
**Run an automated email campaign.** Set up a prewritten, four-email automated sequence that triggers when someone joins your email list. The first three emails should be calls to engage, and the fourth should contain a call to buy; repeat the sequence every month. The primary goal is simply to keep your brand top of mind for customers, so that when they need your product or service, they think of you first. Structure each email around the customer’s problem: describe the problem, explain how you’ll solve it, and paint a picture of how much better life will be once it’s solved.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe08df3b3391de7a--email:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe08df3b3391de7a--testimonial:start -->
**Showcase testimonials of transformation.** Solicit and share customer testimonials that describe how your product improved their lives. Generic requests for testimonials rarely yield strong transformation stories; instead, ask pointed questions such as “how has our product changed your day-to-day life?” to prompt specific, story-driven responses.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe08df3b3391de7a--testimonial:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe08df3b3391de7a--referral:start -->
**Build a rewarding referral system.** Set up a system that lets happy customers recommend your product to others and rewards them for doing so. A simple approach is to send an automated email to customers who have made one or two purchases, containing a video or resource they can forward to friends, and offer existing customers a reward — such as a commission, a gift, or affiliate program membership — for each new customer they refer.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe08df3b3391de7a--referral:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-c060fb7272d3fd69--testimonial:start -->
**Testimonials and endorsements: effectiveness, best practices, and authenticity**

Testimonials and endorsements may help build trust. Shortform cites a 2017 marketing blog claiming 62% more revenue per customer per purchase; the study, denominator, and causal interpretation were not verified, so this figure is not a performance forecast. Effective endorsements depend on two factors. First, success depends on how well you understand your potential customers’ interests—this guides your choice of what kind of expert or endorser to seek out. For example, if you know your customers care about the environment, you would look for someone who has already publicly expressed interest in similar issues. Second, effectiveness depends on how authentic the endorsement feels: the easier it is for people to believe the endorser actually uses your product or service, the more appealing it will be.

Questions should elicit actual experience, not dictate praise. The local source already makes an exception for compensated testimonials when payment is disclosed and the experience remains truthful. This article retains truthfulness and disclosure: fabricated experiences mislead, and paid advocacy must not masquerade as independent testimony. That preserves the source’s conditions without treating its secondhand legal summary as a check of current law.

*References: [62% increase in revenue from every customer, every time they buy from you](https://strategicfactory.com/2017/06/take-it-from-me-why-testimonials-are-so-effective/#:~:text=According%20to%20one%20study%2C%20the,testimonials%20when%20considering%20a%20purchase.) · [an effective way to establish customer trust and increase sales](https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=40853) · [effective endorsements hinge on two factors](https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/celebrity-endorsements) · [Fake testimonials are illegal](https://boast.io/paid-fake-testimonials-illegal/#:~:text=First%2C%20they%20are%20not%20based,testimonial%20claims%20is%20also%20misleading.)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c060fb7272d3fd69--testimonial:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-c060fb7272d3fd69--cta:start -->
**Calls to action: expectations, boldness, and best practices**

Shortform adds that customers not only need calls to action, as Miller argues, but they expect them, due to a psychological phenomenon called perceptual sets: past experiences with websites that include calls to action create an expectation that the next website they visit will also have one. While Miller insists that repetition and boldness signal confidence in your product, others advocate for a more self-deprecating approach to marketing, in which brands make fun of themselves or their product. This approach can feel authentic and honest to customers, making it an appealing alternative.

Shortform also notes that while Miller’s tactics can draw attention to a call to buy, they will not drive purchases if the call itself is weak. Additional best practices for strong calls to buy include: starting with a strong, specific imperative verb such as “subscribe,” “learn,” or “buy”; creating urgency with time-specific language like “now” or “before it’s too late”; inducing an emotional reaction, whether through an exclamation mark or by referencing a positive outcome such as saving money; and tailoring calls to action by device—for example, asking mobile visitors to “call to get started.”

*References: [they also expect them](https://sachsmarketinggroup.com/psychology-calls-action/) · [customer expectations are shaped by past experiences and beliefs](https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-a-perceptual-set-2795464#:~:text=A%20perceptual%20set%20is%20basically,a%20number%20of%20different%20factors.) · [a more self-deprecating approach to marketing](https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/how-self-deprecating-advertising-creates-more-meaningful-consumer-brand-con/518531/) · [start the call with a strong, specific imperative verb](https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-write-an-effective-call-to-action#5-tips-for-writing-an-enticing-call-to-action) · [induce an emotional reaction](https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/10/09/call-to-action)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c060fb7272d3fd69--cta:end -->

<a id="b-64b4e0bfc0f4bbf9"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-cc9068278232"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-64b4e0bfc0f4bbf9:start -->
### Concise brand messaging: loglines versus alternative pitch formats
Shortform contrasts Miller’s logline with alternative concise pitch formats outlined by Daniel H. Pink in *To Sell Is Human*, which are more situation-specific. Pink describes four pitches of varying length: the single-word pitch, which distills the message to its absolute core; the question pitch, phrased as a question to inspire connection; the email subject-line pitch, designed to make recipients curious enough to open an email; and the longest, the Twitter pitch, which inspires a base of followers to act. Shortform notes that Miller’s logline is intended for use across all marketing platforms, whereas Pink’s pitches are tailored to specific situations.

*References: [To Sell Is Human](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/to-sell-is-human/)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-64b4e0bfc0f4bbf9:end -->

<a id="b-2e900bd4f90895e9"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-f4443c59a85a"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-2e900bd4f90895e9:start -->
**Website user experience and trust**

Even with a storyline-aligned website, poor user experience can erode trust and hurt performance. Key tips for a frictionless, trust-building site include: keeping main navigation to a maximum of seven menu buttons for clarity; double-checking for errors such as dead links, broken images, and typos, all of which reduce trust; reducing the number of choices on each page, since too many options confuse visitors and drive them away; and making above-the-fold content engaging enough to encourage scrolling, as deeper scrolling increases investment and likelihood of purchase.

*References: [improving user experience and creating an easy-to-browse website that inspires trust in your customers](https://xd.adobe.com/ideas/principles/web-design/12-dos-donts-web-design-2/)*

The seven-menu-item suggestion is a design heuristic, not a universal cognitive limit. Observed relationships between scrolling and conversion do not establish that adding scroll length causes a sale; test whether users can find the information and complete the intended task.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-2e900bd4f90895e9:end -->

<a id="b-0eb880942e16ba55"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-b92937360008"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-2a2e313a7f70"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-0eb880942e16ba55:start -->
**Cutting Through Noise and Guiding Buyers to Action**


A seller’s biggest challenge is cutting through “noise” — anything that distracts buyers from your offering, such as more exciting services, competing urgency, or other ways buyers could spend their resources. One way to help buyers focus is to acknowledge and demystify that noise upfront. For example, when selling cell phone service, you might name each competitor and briefly explain how they fail to meet the buyer’s specific needs.

A clear call to action is a core tool for reducing friction at the close of a sale. Two common mistakes keep sellers from including one: assuming buyers already have enough clarity and motivation to act on their own, and fearing a call to action will feel too aggressive and push buyers away. In reality, even when buyers know what they want, clear directions relieve the pressure of uncertainty and make a smooth close more likely.

*References: [to cut through the “noise](https://conversedigital.com/social-selling-sales-training-posts/sales-prospecting-techniques) · [A call to action makes it easy for the buyer to take an immediate, specific action.](https://www.thebalancesmb.com/call-to-action-1794380)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-0eb880942e16ba55:end -->

<a id="b-52b4ca4a754091ba"></a>
<a id="u-building-a-storybrand-fbff8cd93f09"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-52b4ca4a754091ba:start -->
**Building Brand Memory Through Regular, Emotionally Engaging Advertising**


Shortform draws a parallel between Sharp’s view of advertising and social media marketing. In *Jab, Jab, Jab, Right Hook*, Gary Vaynerchuk explains how marketers can use social media to promote their brand with a strategy that closely mirrors Sharp’s. Vaynerchuk’s main idea is that the most effective social media advertising focuses on building a long-term relationship with potential customers. To this end, he advises using two types of posts: “jabs,” short and entertaining pieces of branded content, and “right hooks,” calls to action that prompt followers to make a purchase (or “activations,” as discussed elsewhere).

Jabs help build positive memories about a brand among followers, as Sharp recommends. This way, when a brand posts a right hook directly urging the audience to buy, they already have a positive attitude toward the brand and are more likely to purchase. Shortform speculates that memory building could make some purchase prompts redundant, but that does not establish Sharp’s rejection of every call to action.

Like Sharp, Vaynerchuk claims that jabs are most effective when they grab attention and engage emotions. To accomplish this, he recommends integrating references to pop culture and current events into social media posts, making content relevant to topics the audience is already interested in. These in-jokes do not necessarily use logic to persuade audiences to choose a brand, but they typically connect back to the brand in some way. For example, after the 2013 Super Bowl power outage, Oreo posted a graphic with the caption “You Can Still Dunk in the Dark.” Oreo was not trying to logically persuade viewers to buy cookies by advertising that they are still edible in the dark; they caught the audience’s attention by poking fun at the power outage, then turned that attention into a positive memory about the brand by making the audience think about “dunking” Oreos in milk.

Shortform also discusses the contentious idea that any publicity helps. In *Trust Me, I’m Lying*, Ryan Holiday recounts deliberately provoking nationwide protests against an offensive film he was hired to promote. He credits the stunt with drawing attention to the film. This account does not identify how many people would have watched without it, any net attendance increase, or profit. It illustrates a route from controversy to awareness, while leaving open whether damaged trust outweighed that attention.

*References: [Jab, Jab, Jab, Right Hook](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/jab-jab-jab-right-hook) · [he advises using two types of posts](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/jab-jab-jab-right-hook#jabs-and-right-hooks) · [Trust Me, I’m Lying](https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/311968/trust-me-im-lying-by-ryan-holiday/)*

Vaynerchuk’s jabs can vary with the platform: a funny video, a question, a quote, or an article can invite participation before a purchase request. This comparison links Miller’s engagement CTA to the relationship built by such content; it does not make either a universal posting ratio.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-52b4ca4a754091ba:end -->

<a id="theme-commitment-service"></a>

## Help the buyer decide and sustain the seller’s resilience

<a id="b-c5aa160f0300fb16"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-82815b3bb43e"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-ee79afc815ef"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-450e667f1f13"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-c5aa160f0300fb16:start -->
### The Ubiquity of Contemporary Selling
Daniel H. Pink argues that selling is no longer a specialized function limited to people with “sales” in their job title; the modern workplace has turned everyone into a seller of sorts. He coins the term *non-sales selling*, or contemporary selling, to describe the act of moving others to exchange resources—exchanges that may involve money but do not have to. Negotiating a price, asking someone on a date, and interviewing for a job all count as contemporary selling. More broadly, *To Sell Is Human* frames selling as an intrinsically human skill that has evolved alongside us, and the book explores how deeply embedded it is in daily life. Shortform’s editors—not Pink or the book—add that their guide supports, contrasts, and simplifies Pink’s ideas so readers can put them into action in sales and beyond.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c5aa160f0300fb16:end -->

<a id="b-857cf6415b6251ed"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-d7cf8084d66e"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-a2c8e4052714"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-039574b49da8"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-a5c062f0c5a0"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-857cf6415b6251ed:start -->
**How economic disruption eroded traditional specialized sales roles**

Economic disruption was one force behind the decline of specialized traditional sales roles. The previously predictable economy became unstable during the Great Recession, which quickly transformed the workforce. It forced workers to broaden their skill sets to help companies cut costs: skills like sales, once specialized roles, became basic necessities for everyone to boost organizational efficiency. The economic instability also spurred a wave of entrepreneurship; self-starters often need to wear many hats, which further contributed to demand for flexible skill sets including sales.

A second force—the technology-driven shift in information and bargaining power—is discussed just below in [the account of buyers’ ability to check claims](#b-5519fc47500a0d31).
<!-- atlas:block-content b-857cf6415b6251ed:end -->

<a id="b-e97a5ef017561513"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-3ba13b60d317"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-e97a5ef017561513:start -->
**Soft Skills and the Evolving Demand for Sales Ability**


As sales skills have become more critical for workers, so have interpersonal or “soft” skills, which are closely related: to sell, you need to be able to relate to people. It is therefore not surprising that both skill types are in increasing demand in response to the changing economy. Specifically, soft skills include social skills, emotional intelligence, time management, and handling conflict effectively. [https://www.thebalancecareers.com/what-are-soft-skills-2060852](https://www.thebalancecareers.com/what-are-soft-skills-2060852)
<!-- atlas:block-content b-e97a5ef017561513:end -->

<a id="b-5519fc47500a0d31"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-19bec873479b"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-a957f9ad96fd"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5519fc47500a0d31:start -->
**Buyers can check more; information gaps remain**

Pink argues that the internet increased buyers’ ability to compare offers and challenge sellers’ claims, weakening some information advantages. The earlier story in which sellers knew everything and buyers knew nothing is too absolute; access to a page also does not give everyone equal expertise or information. Service and honesty remain obligations and useful foundations for relationships, not automatic consequences of technology. A seller can still have a conflict of interest while sounding helpful.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5519fc47500a0d31:end -->

<a id="b-ae7a3b369fed2a17"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-4c8dfe0b7973"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-ae7a3b369fed2a17:start -->
**Selling as a Universal Human Activity**


Shortform notes that the idea of selling as a universal human activity is far from new. As far back as the 1800s, Scottish novelist Robert Louis Stevenson wrote, “Everyone lives by selling something.” The idea has become even more prominent in the modern workplace for the practical and emotional reasons Pink outlines. Whether persuading others to accept your ideas, your products, or yourself, the ability to sell is both natural and necessary for shaping the outcomes you want in life.

*References: [Robert Louis Stevenson wrote, “Everyone lives by selling something.”](https://www.bernadettemcclelland.com/everyone-lives-by-selling-something/)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-ae7a3b369fed2a17:end -->

<a id="b-f7cab11a1169b9fc"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-1df2d7e7c240"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-f7cab11a1169b9fc:start -->
**Entrepreneurship as a Sales Function**


While it may be tempting to see entrepreneurs primarily as visionaries rather than salespeople, entrepreneurs typically wear many hats and need a diverse skill set—most of which involves sales, because you must be able to sell your brand and the uniqueness and usefulness of your product.

*References: [because you need to be able to sell your brand and the uniqueness and usefulness of your product](https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/269882)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-f7cab11a1169b9fc:end -->

<a id="b-c803e7789e776b11"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-f34c13cc5293"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-f33ec03d59e6"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-c2c0fd102eb3"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-8bd2b9f21d69"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-a5e8a5bd9047"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-315c45c224e1"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-721c07c8507a"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-626869ec283b"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-3dbbd372d963"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-8ee1d28e33e4"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-0d9e784c413e"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-e4952fd03f0b"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-4837d03a421b"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-5af8425f2fa6"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-c4cbd0c4cf08"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-349fd7babd55"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-21b1ff604531"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-26ac22487afe"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-95214b3a55b0"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-ee7974151d22"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-c803e7789e776b11:start -->
### Attunement, buoyancy, and clarity (ABC)
Pink contrasts a pressure-oriented tradition—questions, feature presentations, objection handling, and closing tricks such as artificial urgency—with a service-oriented ideal. He associates the former with the 1920s and the slogan “Always Be Closing.” A car seller misrepresenting quality to charge more illustrates the abuse. This is his critical sketch, not a claim that all earlier sellers lacked integrity or that they were entitled to ignore buyers’ needs.

Pink argues that economic and technological shifts have given rise to a new sales philosophy that replaces the old ABCs. Where the traditional model centered on the seller’s profit, the modern approach is oriented toward meeting buyer needs through three core pillars: attunement, buoyancy, and clarity (ABC)—called connection, optimism, and focus in the local Shortform guide; this article uses the ABC names for the three principles. This shift reflects a move from *caveat emptor* to *caveat venditor* (“seller beware”), in which integrity is no longer optional — it is essential to sales success.

The first pillar of Pink’s modern sales model is attunement: the ability to attune yourself to people, communities, and contexts in order to serve their needs. He recommends three specific techniques for practicing attunement in sales.

The first technique is mimicking: subtly mirroring a buyer’s mannerisms builds trust, because people tend to trust those who share or echo their behavioral style. For example, if a buyer is physically expressive during conversation, a seller can use more gestures to foster camaraderie.

The second technique is perspective taking: putting yourself in the buyer’s shoes to develop a deeper understanding of their situation and the broader context of their needs. This imaginative shift can reveal needs you would miss if you stayed focused only on your own perspective or experience. Shortform imagines a small-statured new driver shopping for a truck and a seller suggesting a smaller sports car. The useful step is to investigate fit and intended use with the buyer; body size alone does not establish that a sports car is safer or easier to handle. Treat the story’s satisfied ending as a hypothetical, not evidence for recommending a vehicle by appearance.

The third technique is power shifting: treating the buyer as the one with authority in the interaction. This creates a service dynamic in which you can focus on meeting their needs rather than advancing your own interests. A simple example is sitting at an equal physical level with the buyer and asking, “What are you looking for, and how can I help?” — a posture and question that establish an even playing field and a service orientation.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c803e7789e776b11:end -->

<a id="b-62a9f2676f790348"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-c0e9d4a9e3fa"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-5ef22eaf6250"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-1b3e6eb52d37"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-3bb4bc364d7e"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-62a9f2676f790348:start -->
**Shortform’s cautions on connection techniques**

Shortform distinguishes empathy—the ability to understand a buyer’s need and establish trust—from the fuller act of connection, which requires trying on the buyer’s perspective. It offers a three-step exercise: identify your own view of the conflict, feelings, and likely response; reconstruct the other person’s view, feelings, and motives; then revisit your original view and note what changed.

Two cautions bound Pink’s techniques. Power can improve productivity while reducing empathy, which supports mentally giving the buyer more authority. Mimicry can build rapport, but used mechanically or in the wrong context it can upset people and damage the relationship.

*References: [empathy in sales](https://galvintech.com/empathy-in-sales-why-it-matters/#:~:text=Empathy%20is%20having%20the%20ability,another%20person%20from%20their%20perspective.&text=Instead%20of%20seeking%20to%20sincerely,towards%20securing%20the%20desired%20outcome.) · [connection and the buyer’s view](https://www.danpink.com/newsletters/the-new-abcs-of-selling-3-simple-exercises-you-can-do-now/#:~:text=Attunement%20is%20the%20capacity%20to,from%20their%20point%20of%20view.) · [perspective exercise](https://psychologycompass.com/blog/point-of-view/) · [power and empathy](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-empathy/201909/power-blocks-empathy) · [limits of mimicry](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/beyond-words/201209/mimicry-and-mirroring-can-be-good-or-bad).*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-62a9f2676f790348:end -->

<a id="b-1eb1375b8eaeab02"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-f423b63676d6"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-f34183b577b3"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-86f03fbd7d36"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-53dce4a89bc3"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-680c943c2fbf"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-28e331b906cd"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-bf31d539fd50"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-4845c2175a4e"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-df60086bb2e0"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-fbd9a07468e6"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-bf65f22eeffd"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-c40259a3bf4d"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-cb13544674b8"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-b019375c00cc"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-1eb1375b8eaeab02:start -->
### Buoyancy: prepare, persist, and recover without a ratio recipe
Pink’s second ABC principle is **buoyancy**: staying afloat through rejection. Shortform calls it optimism. A door-to-door seller may keep a conversation constructive when a prospect objects, then move on when the answer is a firm no. The aim is resilient service, not overriding refusal.

Before the conversation, use interrogative self-talk to prepare: “How can I best serve this buyer?” or “How can I show that this purchase is worth it?” Specific questions connect confidence with a plan. During the conversation, maintain a friendly atmosphere and speak with conviction while giving drawbacks their proper weight. In the car example, describe relevant strengths and limitations honestly; do not ration negative information to make the pitch feel positive. Afterward, identify what went well and consider whether a setback was temporary, specific to the circumstances, or unrelated to your personal worth. Those are questions for a realistic explanation, not reasons to deny an actual mistake.

The source also prescribed a positive-to-negative experience ratio between 3:1 and 11:1. Do not use that prescription. Brown, Sokal, and Friedman’s 2013 critique found the underlying fluid-dynamics mathematics inapplicable and the claimed critical threshold unfounded. This withdraws the numerical recipe, not the qualitative practices of preparation, constructive communication, or recovery. [Original-author abstract](https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7006)
<!-- atlas:block-content b-1eb1375b8eaeab02:end -->

<a id="b-a221328ce72b00b4"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-89a336b90cad"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-5a9500b66c9a"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-b44d194de119"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-a556f47f8a67"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-a221328ce72b00b4:start -->
**Optimism, explanatory style, and observed performance**

Shortform retells a MetLife comparison in which new hires took optimism and sales-aptitude tests; the company hired thousands of salespeople each year. Those passing both tests reportedly had an 8% higher “success rate” in year one than those passing only aptitude, with a 31% gap in year two. Those high in optimism but low in aptitude reportedly outperformed the aptitude-only group by 21% and 57% in the respective years. These retain the secondary source’s outcome descriptions; it does not provide a fully reproducible measure here. Group differences do not establish that an optimism exercise caused the result or that every sales environment rewards the same trait.

The adjacent practical advice is to organize interrogative self-talk around who you are, who the buyer is, and what value you bring. Specific preparation can support confidence while keeping attention on the buyer’s needs.

A negative explanatory cycle can make setbacks feel permanent and uncontrollable, potentially reinforcing helplessness. That possibility does not make real hardship or a failed sale the person’s fault for having the wrong attitude. The source’s growth-mindset alternative emphasizes effort, self-discipline, resilience, ownership, and creative initiative as ways to preserve agency and learn. Apply these as qualitative preparation and reflection practices, without a prescribed positive-to-negative ratio.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-a221328ce72b00b4:end -->

<a id="b-fe394530dc0d9552"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-b46be2868b4c"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-d3279f51685f"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-191a7b3b095b"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-116a3fb9f6a9"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-b29ad60f2c5f"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-d0d10eb0dd40"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-d8f6791f9992"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-4af6c023f810"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-16adfeec556a"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-5c082950a84e"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-5acd28061a63"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-3d86dab55635"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-24204f202b8b"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-72412334ba5f"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-fb57887ae5f0"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-fe0ab2756035"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-387ca54ae9ee"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-6c1fee0735c7"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-8957d5468635"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-d3fdf227054e"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-465c9b3f035a"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-ef4a1b377312"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe394530dc0d9552:start -->
### Clarity: find the right problem
Pink’s third principle is clarity: help buyers understand what needs solving before choosing a solution. The guide calls it “focus.” Older feature–objection–close scripts often start with a presumed problem; Pink stresses examining that premise. Solving a buyer’s problem and making a sale are not synonymous.

Problem finding requires thorough questions, multiple perspectives, and willingness to revise an initial answer. The guide imagines a tutor and life coach meeting a bright 12-year-old with low grades, discovering a self-discipline problem, and offering coaching instead of additional subject tutoring. The example shows a change in diagnosis and service; low grades alone do not establish poor self-discipline, and the story’s quick improvement is not evidence that coaching will produce the same result for another child.

Another way to create focus is to sell experiences rather than products. Experiences foster connection and open up opportunities for joy or growth. Framing a sale around experience directs the buyer’s attention to how they will benefit and makes them more likely to become emotionally invested in the purchase. For example, instead of selling a “cellphone,” sell a “tool for staying connected to the people you care about” — this keeps the buyer focused on the phone’s purpose and the positive experience it will bring.

Provide a clear, low-effort path to a useful next step. The guide’s therapy example combines an initial discussion of goals, an outline of possible sessions and timing, and a packaged option instead of only pay-as-you-go billing. These make the process easier to understand; they cannot guarantee a therapeutic outcome or fixed recovery date. Explain the choice and its terms, including the option to decline, rather than assuming that a package is inherently better for the client.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe394530dc0d9552:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-dee83e9e456ce8c8--contrast:start -->
### Use contrast to clarify the choice

In sales, the same logic of contrast applies to helping buyers clarify their priorities and perceive value. Research shows people understand things more clearly when they see them in contrast with other options. You can help buyers develop focus by presenting multiple potential paths for comparison, or by using a less favorable option to highlight the benefits of a stronger one. For example, when selling a car, having multiple vehicles available to show — including one of lower quality than the others — lets you use the lower-quality option to emphasize the advantages of the better cars.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-dee83e9e456ce8c8--contrast:end -->

<a id="b-9332b15a3d4b9c05"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-3780937de10b"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-9332b15a3d4b9c05:start -->
**The Contrast Principle in Sales Perception**


Robert Cialdini explores the contrast principle in *The Psychology of Persuasion*, describing how comparison shapes perception and can be harnessed for sales success. [According to Cialdini, when we experience two things at the same time or one after another, we automatically compare the value of the second to the value of the first.](https://tactics.convertize.com/definitions/contrast-principle) Our judgment of the second item is heavily influenced by how we perceive the first. For example, if a curtain salesperson first shows you a set you find ugly, then shows you a set you would consider average on its own, the second set will look better by comparison. You are more likely to buy the average set than you would have been if it had been the only option presented.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-9332b15a3d4b9c05:end -->

<a id="b-11fa4d35255041f7"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-73294deeb5b5"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-11fa4d35255041f7:start -->
**Problem Finding as a Sales Skill**


Albert Einstein is often cited for the idea that identifying a problem is more important than solving it. Solving a problem requires relatively little imagination — mainly trial-and-error and logical thinking. Identifying a problem, by contrast, demands creativity and innovative questioning, and it unlocks new possibilities that were invisible before the problem was named. This aligns with the sales practice of problem finding: uncovering unrecognized needs opens up new value for the buyer.

*References: [identifying a problem is more important than solving a problem,](https://uxdesign.cc/problem-finding-before-problem-solving-4aaaa8bdb889)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-11fa4d35255041f7:end -->

<a id="b-6ec91ba89ef05778"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-168b314d6f5d"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-e8cce1936bd2"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-241884497c34"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-625c75af1455"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-375a9514350b"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-0919fc2644a6"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-6ec91ba89ef05778:start -->
### Service-oriented sales, Step 1: make it personal
Pink describes selling as service when its intention is to improve someone else’s life. The first of his two recommendations is personal involvement: understand what you value in the product and why you want another person to benefit. A distant performance of professionalism can impede connection, while a sincere explanation may make the conversation more credible.

His phone-sales example illustrates the possible contribution of interest: enthusiasm for phones may encourage a seller to learn more and help a buyer. Lack of enthusiasm does not prove greed, and enthusiasm does not prove competence or high-quality service. Judge the service by the seller’s knowledge, behavior, and the customer’s feedback—not by the visible passion alone.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-6ec91ba89ef05778:end -->

<a id="b-b50ab35b0c48cf2d"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-8b874824cf35"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-41b68feadb4f"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-5685060d4a51"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-b50ab35b0c48cf2d:start -->
### Service-oriented sales, Step 2: connect the work to a purpose
Pink’s second recommendation is to connect the work to a purpose beyond the immediate transaction. He asks sellers to consider how their service might improve society and explain that contribution when it is relevant to the buyer. Purpose is a suggested motivational resource, not an established universal law that people are born to serve or perform best whenever they believe in a larger mission.

The teacher example makes the shift concrete: a teacher can view the job as earning a paycheck, helping individual students, and preparing those students to use their learning to improve the world. That wider purpose can sustain effort; whether the service helps still depends on what the teacher actually does and what students need.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b50ab35b0c48cf2d:end -->

<a id="b-b0f47a7d5b5c34c7"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-abbf70c07027"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-0e6566b20e8b"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-976845a77809"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-b0f47a7d5b5c34c7:start -->
### Bonus: replace upselling with upserving
Pink also introduces the concept of “upserving” as a way to enlarge your service mindset. Traditional upselling — convincing a customer to buy add-ons or a more expensive product — generally serves the seller’s own interests, rooted in the question “What can others do for me?” Upserving, by contrast, means helping buyers meet needs they didn’t even know they had, guided by the question “What can I do for others?” For example, when selling a phone to an elderly buyer who needs simplicity, a commission-focused salesperson might push a high-tech, expensive model, while a service-focused one would help her find the most reliable, easy-to-use option — even if it earns less commission.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b0f47a7d5b5c34c7:end -->

<a id="b-e53d42c989668687"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-be3c7ea5f9cf"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-ce6c74ca6bcf"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-f88f789cc6aa"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-e53d42c989668687:start -->
### The Service-Based Sales Model and Its Core Logic

The service-based sales model is a growing approach that can be applied to any niche. Life coach Linda Luke frames its key components with the acronym SERVICE: Start with attentive listening and thoughtful questions; Evaluate the client based on their needs; Recommend solutions that fit those needs; Value your service and be able to articulate that value; Interest — assess how interested the buyer is in your offering; Commitment — negotiate a transaction that meets both parties’ needs; and Extend — go above and beyond to serve and maintain communication after the initial sale. Focusing on these elements helps create the most mutually beneficial transaction for everyone involved.

Service-oriented selling works because it builds sales trust — a dynamic in which the buyer sees you as an authority and believes you care about their best interests. This trust matters for three reasons: it supports long-term seller-buyer relationships, it gives you the benefit of the doubt when you make mistakes, and it keeps buyers coming back while also helping you attract new ones.

The COVID-19 pandemic underscored why serving the customer matters more than ever. Forced into social isolation, fear, and distrust, many people came to rely on home delivery and digital contact as lifelines rather than conveniences. Five key reasons service matters especially in difficult times are: it creates a sense of stability, it supports human connection, it provides high value, it reduces stress for clients, and it creates meaningful customer experiences.

*References: [Begin with attentive listening and asking well-thought-out questions.](http://www.simplesmartbusiness.com/a-service-based-sales-model/) · [This trust matters for three reasons:](https://www.dalecarnegie.com/blog/3-reasons-why-trust-is-the-most-important-tool-for-driving-profitable-sales/) · [Service to the customer creates a sense of stability.](https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescommunicationscouncil/2021/03/02/five-reasons-why-customer-service-matters-even-more-in-difficult-times/?sh=4630ee9417e2)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-e53d42c989668687:end -->

<a id="b-b9845969e6034a22"></a>
<a id="u-to-sell-is-human-e8437794baeb"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-b9845969e6034a22:start -->
**The Cultural Roots of “Always Be Closing”**


The “Always Be Closing” mantra entered popular culture through the 1992 film *Glengarry Glen Ross* (adapted from David Mamet’s award-winning play), in which Alec Baldwin’s character delivers the iconic “A-B-C. A-Always, B-Be, C-Closing. Always be closing!” speech. Baldwin’s character embodies the archetypal pushy salesman, fixated on closing the deal regardless of whether it benefits the buyer. This phrase has since become shorthand for the traditional, aggressive approach to sales that modern service-oriented models reject.

*References: [and popularized the phrase “A-B-C. A-Always, B-Be, C-Closing. Always be closing!”](https://www.thesaleswhisperer.com/blog/abc-selling)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b9845969e6034a22:end -->

<a id="theme-sales-discovery"></a>

## Use SPIN to develop an explicit need and a reasonable commitment

<a id="b-c4273c5f1389cd8c"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-cba5ae938041"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-c8a9f000acdc"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-c32b265a7679"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-a30c1652b2d4"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-47ccb3cd37bf"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-54c807f0515e"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-c4273c5f1389cd8c:start -->
**The Shift from Traditional to Complex Solution Selling**


Rackham developed SPIN from research into major sales, and the book appeared in 1988. Later accounts of the growth of complex solution selling help explain the continuing challenge, but a shift beginning in the 1990s cannot be the cause of an already published model. SPIN names four kinds of questions: Situation, Problem, Implication, and Need-Payoff. Implication questions explore consequences rather than supplying leading suggestions.

Over the last several decades, a parallel shift has occurred across virtually every industry: more suppliers have moved from selling simple products to selling complex “solutions”—bundles of products and services. Suppliers developed solution selling to differentiate themselves from competitors, because small product differences had become harder to sell as customers viewed competing products as essentially identical and chose the lowest-priced option. Well-designed bundled offerings are customized and therefore difficult for competitors to duplicate; bundling also saves suppliers money and allows them to justify premium pricing.

This more complex sales dynamic has been difficult for many reps to execute. Reps need to develop a deep understanding of the customer’s business, which takes more time. They also need to build consensus across the customer organization, since decision-makers will not agree to a costly, complicated deal without it. Additionally, customers are more risk averse, more likely to demand customization, and more likely to use third-party consultants to vet deals and try to negotiate better terms.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c4273c5f1389cd8c:end -->

<a id="b-f7650ead3b95a219"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-7b9167ac8f77"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-77384f632e0f"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-4d17e26500e7"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-f7650ead3b95a219:start -->
### How Large Sales Differ Fundamentally from Small Sales

Rackham’s research established that large sales differ from small sales in several key ways, and therefore require a more sophisticated conversation with the customer:
- **Length of the selling cycle**: Small sales can often be handled in a single call where the customer buys on the spot. Major sales, by contrast, typically require many sales calls spread over months.
- **Size of the commitment**: In a small sale, the customer is not spending much money, so the rep does not need to strongly emphasize product value to close the deal. In a large sale involving a major financial commitment, however, the rep must increase the perceived value of the product or service so it seems worth the price.
- **The ongoing relationship**: Small sales usually involve no long-term relationship. In large sales, the rep builds a long-term relationship with the customer because multiple calls are needed to close.
- **The risk of mistakes**: When the purchase is small, the customer does not worry much about losing money if the product does not work out. Customers are extremely cautious about large purchases, because mistakes are costly.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-f7650ead3b95a219:end -->

<a id="b-2e80c087f1721a47"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-448a2ea8e963"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-cf55e7653488"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-2e80c087f1721a47:start -->
**When questioning helps, and when an insight helps**

Neil Rackham, founder of Huthwaite International, argues that effective major-sale questions differ in purpose, not just in whether they are open or closed. Some techniques useful in small sales can impede large ones. *SPIN Selling* appeared in 1988; the archive’s “32 years since publication” was its own historical clock.

SPIN is useful when a buyer can describe dissatisfaction and needs help understanding its consequences and the value of change. Challenger selling, developed through later CEB research, adds a different starting point: the buyer may not recognize a consequential problem or opportunity, so a seller brings a researched insight for the buyer to examine. These are conditional choices, not a simple succession in which teaching makes questions obsolete. Both require learning the customer’s business. Stop pushing a diagnosis when the facts do not support it or the proposed next step is not worthwhile to the buyer.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-2e80c087f1721a47:end -->

<a id="b-912f8a9cdac0ed5e"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-db3fa7ef5bff"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-7a849d3a9427"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-78044104bbca"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-1f8a2bcb4ea2"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-926eb7769b63"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-737bfcd1102e"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-41ca7594ce5c"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-24f40a6bd27a"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-912f8a9cdac0ed5e:start -->
### The Four Universal Stages of a Sales Call

All sales calls share four basic stages, though their relative importance differs between small and large sales:
1. **Warming up/Opening**: Introducing yourself and starting the conversation. Openings matter more in brief one-call sales than in protracted large sales.
2. **Investigating**: Asking questions to understand the customer and uncover needs. In large sales, reps ask more and deeper probing questions because the stakes are higher.
3. **Demonstrating value**: Showing how your product or service addresses the customer’s specific problems in a way that justifies the cost, especially for broader solutions.
4. **Getting commitment**: Ending with a customer commitment. In small sales this usually means a purchase; in large sales it may be an intermediate step such as another meeting or access to a decision-maker—these are called advances because they move the customer toward a decision.

Traditional training treats closing as the most important stage and teaches high-pressure closing techniques, but in major sales the investigating stage is the most important.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-912f8a9cdac0ed5e:end -->

<a id="b-81ed546ab237b749"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-61ca55d3b42b"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-473daef6c070"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-3d60b53ba2d5"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-731dff9f45a1"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-949c3ad1fb40"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-b71e1851c90d"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-ce8bc5839d98"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-158f5d11cef8"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-b87e665375b8"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-7c910b476bba"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-0098bb91c230"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-b885fbfa56b4"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-027d793a4d51"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-f0b21a1191ab"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-81ed546ab237b749:start -->
### Customer Needs: Implied vs. Explicit and the Value Equation

In sales, a need is a want or problem identified by the customer that the seller can address. Salespeople discover, develop, and address customer needs by using SPIN questions during the investigating stage, which requires both questioning skill and an understanding of how needs develop.

There are two types of needs, and they play out differently in small versus large sales:
- **Implied needs** are problems and frustrations the customer expresses—for example, “I’m not happy with the quality our press is producing,” or “Our system creates too much waste.”
- **Explicit needs** are strong wants or desires the customer expresses—for example, “We need a more efficient system,” or “We have to cut our procurement costs.”

In small sales, implied needs can lead to success without further development into explicit needs; the more implied needs a rep uncovers, the better the chances of a sale. In large sales, by contrast, the number of implied needs uncovered has no bearing on call results. Implied needs are only a starting point; they must be further developed into explicit needs for a large sale to succeed.

The reason lies in the **value equation** customers use to make buying decisions: they weigh the seriousness of their problem against the cost of the solution. When a solution is inexpensive, weaker needs can be enough to tip the scale toward buying. But when the solution is expensive, the buyer must feel a much stronger need to be motivated to purchase; she asks herself whether the problem is big enough to warrant paying that much. In a major sale, you have to build an implied need into a bigger, more urgent need—an explicit need—so that the size of the problem, and the risk the customer is taking, justifies the cost of your solution.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-81ed546ab237b749:end -->

<a id="b-96ea82d492258df3"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-7c52498de3b8"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-0803c414a786"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-78cc830c493b"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-f0f581eb277c"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-13f8232b0f14"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-eaa6959f0838"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-8e42fbeea819"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-69f9d8498a55"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-060e797b2b81"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-6c0212895ec8"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-9a4263786dd5"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-16c898a06768"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-6a7d5fbcfcd2"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-69a0b0a975c2"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-cfc69e71aaf3"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-07aeb2effcf9"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-8a93bb104f83"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-ac64aae18099"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-dfa7a7337f54"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-c25ffd2d009e"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-de13a401d9d0"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-b1bd18edfe3b"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-414bd830b00f"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-f269b22b5cf7"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-8b53efc54a26"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-172d192ac513"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-96ea82d492258df3:start -->
### The SPIN Question Sequence

Huthwaite researchers found that successful reps in large sales spend the most time on the investigating stage and handle it differently from the traditional approach. Whereas traditional sales emphasizes product features, objection handling, and closing techniques, successful large-sales reps focus on asking four types of questions in sequence—the SPIN sequence. Together, the questions uncover and develop implied needs, turn them into explicit needs, and lead toward customer commitment to act:
1. **Situation questions**: Fact-finding and background questions such as “What do you see as the company’s biggest growth opportunities?” Use them sparingly, as too many can tax the customer’s time and patience.
2. **Problem questions**: Questions that uncover implied needs by exploring problems your product can solve, such as “Are you concerned about meeting your clients’ quality standards with your aging equipment?” Less experienced reps ask too few of these.
3. **Implication questions**: More sophisticated questions that explore the ramifications of a problem—for example, “How will this affect your fourth-quarter results?” or “What will this mean for your biggest customer?” Their purpose is to develop those implied needs by underscoring the problem’s significance and creating urgency until the buyer states an explicit need; they are difficult to frame even for experienced reps. Useful formulations include “Could the limitations of your equipment be costing you new business?”, “Do your equipment problems increase turnover or make it more difficult to hire operators?”, and “Is this leading to increased costs?” Research indicates that implication questions contribute strongly to success in larger sales and increase perceived value: as the problem looks bigger, the solution looks more valuable and worth its price. In smaller sales, reps may move directly from problem questions to offering a solution; large sales require this deeper layer.
4. **Need-payoff questions**: Questions that lead the customer to articulate the benefits of your solution, such as “How useful would it be if we could increase your output by 10%?” or “How would being able to reduce errors help you?” Other useful formulations include “How would this help you?”, “What would be the benefits of solving this problem?”, and “What makes this solution useful to you?” When customers link the value of solving a problem to your product’s capabilities, they are more likely to accept it as the best solution. Need-payoff questions contribute strongly to success in large sales.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-96ea82d492258df3:end -->


<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe394530dc0d9552--commit:start -->
### Secure a reasonable next step

Neil Rackham’s *SPIN Selling* adds four practices for securing a concrete next step in major sales. In large B2B or high-value sales, traditional pressure-based closing techniques backfire by breeding resentment and undermining the sale. The ultimate objective of a sales call is to get the customer to take a specific action that advances the sale — whether that is buying the solution, attending a product demonstration, or another next step. Successful reps secure commitment through four practices aligned with the modern focus on value and clarity. First, they invest heavily in investigating and demonstrating value, spending more time uncovering and developing customer needs than less successful reps, so the customer feels a pressing need for the solution. Second, they check for unanswered questions and concerns, inviting the customer to raise anything else that needs addressing before moving forward. Third, they summarize the key benefits of the solution — because long, complex sales calls can cause customers to lose track of critical points, summarizing both reinforces the value and builds urgency. Fourth, they propose rather than ask for a commitment, suggesting the next logical step that both advances the sale and is the most advanced reasonable step for the customer; for example, “Since we’ve discussed how the new system fixes your speed and reliability problems, may I suggest the next logical step would be a demonstration for your department?”
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe394530dc0d9552--commit:end -->

<a id="b-76e01cd30412f6e7"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-fd8a4eebbfdf"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-3043da4024cf"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-fd5da79b27cd"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-bd4a6afffd6b"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-aaccaa2f1948"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-e46152951102"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-ec90c3698bd5"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-9724791c747b"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-3e5916b246e6"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-7e9fd53e7c59"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-21d98d1eb61a"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-7837646b7f03"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-365be3b1ea65"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-d031ad80f586"></a>
<a id="u-spin-selling-363da3b9fa7d"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-76e01cd30412f6e7:start -->
### Implementing SPIN Selling: Four Practice Steps

Successful SPIN selling requires diligent practice. Four steps help translate SPIN ideas into action:

#### 1. Focus Planning on the Investigating Stage

Reps often plan what they will tell the customer about the product (the demonstrating value phase) rather than what they will ask. But it is critical to first develop the customer’s needs through questions so that she wants the value your product delivers. Since investigating is the most important stage, focus planning on your probing SPIN questions.

#### 2. Develop and Practice Questions Following the SPIN Sequence

Start with the easier situation and problem questions and progress to harder types:
- First, determine whether you are asking enough questions overall; if you spend most of the call talking about features, scale back and ask situation questions until questioning feels as natural as describing features.
- Next, plan at least a half-dozen problem questions per call, focusing on quantity over quality.
- Then move to implication questions, which may take months of practice; imagine the customer asking “so what?” about a problem, and frame your arguments for why the problem matters as questions.
- Finally, plan need-payoff questions; instead of presenting benefits, ask questions that get the customer to tell you how your solution will benefit him—for example, “What do you see as the pluses of this?” and “How would that help?”

#### 3. Think of Your Product as a Problem-Solver

Rather than focusing on features and advantages, list the problems the product solves and use that list to plan SPIN questions.

#### 4. Plan, Implement, and Review

Planning and executing calls embeds new skills, but reviewing and analyzing afterward accelerates learning. After each call, ask yourself:
- Did I accomplish what I intended?
- What would I do differently?
- What have I learned for future calls with this customer?
- What have I learned for all my calls?

Avoid settling for a general impression; dig into details such as which questions had the greatest effect. The behavioral details outlined in *SPIN Selling* are research-proven building blocks of successful sales, and your attention to those details determines your results.

The six planned problem questions and staged practice are rehearsal guidance, not a quota to impose on every call. Use available background research to avoid burdening a real buyer with unnecessary situation questions, and follow what the answers reveal rather than mechanically completing the list.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-76e01cd30412f6e7:end -->

<a id="theme-challenger"></a>

## Teach a useful insight before proposing the supplier

<a id="b-e4418d4e61857106"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-59760125160e"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-39741f4bbdbb"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-b6b295564bec"></a>
<a id="b-c1ddb39642802b68"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-8abe2f78daea"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-e4418d4e61857106:start -->
### Why the Challenger model emerged
Matthew Dixon and Brent Adamson’s *The Challenger Sale* draws on CEB research involving thousands of sales representatives around the 2008–09 recession. Some representatives kept performing well while many struggled; the researchers examined the behaviors associated with that difference, especially helping customers think and act differently.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-e4418d4e61857106:end -->

<!-- atlas:block-content b-c1ddb39642802b68:start -->
The study challenges relationship building as the sole route to complex B2B success. It does not show that the economy had no effect, that selling method explained every outcome, or that any company can reproduce the results simply by adopting the label. Treat its profiles and performance comparisons as reported observations from the study, with organizational support and market conditions still relevant.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c1ddb39642802b68:end -->

<a id="b-73d0a0bd7ea98b8c"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-ce3397df6db3"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-6de853f440e8"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-82520c42997b"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-1925c6d2f985"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-bfaa02e9b681"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-3f8636cbc196"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-3e1c02c1ac38"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-b6b88fad6af3"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-5625fd5ce5fd"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-cc67df07da80"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-967655c9a7ed"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-bb8ddb1e930c"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-a5734595ffcf"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-73d0a0bd7ea98b8c:start -->
### What the Challenger research observed

CEB’s researchers identified five types of sales representatives:
- **Challenger**: challenges the customer and takes control of the sales conversation.
- **Hard Worker**: goes the extra mile.
- **Relationship Builder**: concentrates on strong customer relationships.
- **Lone Wolf**: works in their own way.
- **Reactive Problem-Solver**: stays ready to respond to customer requests.

Every type included high performers. Challengers were especially prominent among high performers in the complex solution-selling sample. The local summary describes Relationship Builders, though favored by sales executives, as the type least likely to succeed in the complex-sales setting it discusses. It does not provide a reproducible success rate for each type. The authors attribute this to excessive reluctance to create discomfort in a customer relationship; it is not proof that relationships are useless.

The source reports that standout representatives outperformed average representatives by almost 200% in solution selling, compared with 59% in traditional sales. The local summary does not supply a reproducible definition of that performance measure. These are historical group comparisons, not experimental effects of Challenger training or forecasts for every team. CEB used the observed skills and behaviors to propose a template for organizations to develop and test in their own conditions.

The authors emphasize the sales experience in the customer research they report; the local summary does not establish that it outranks product, service, and price in every purchase. It describes customers seeking insight into cutting costs, making money, and reducing risk. Five valued contributions explain what a useful interaction can offer:
- A distinctive and valuable view of the market.
- Help navigating alternatives.
- Advice.
- Help anticipating potential problems.
- Education about new issues and outcomes.

“Tell me something new about my business” captures this teaching role. It makes a case for a useful conversation without making the offer’s price or quality irrelevant.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-73d0a0bd7ea98b8c:end -->

<a id="b-da46c738cc5006b7"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-2aaf433f6b1c"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-771015e78634"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-0fbb6139ee48"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-cf178c0d0378"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-8f05c6b71acc"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-22053268d036"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-6882d4cf73d9"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-daee62503ed1"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-da46c738cc5006b7:start -->
### Core profile and three abilities of a Challenger
Nearly 40% of all high performers in the CEB study were Challengers. Of 44 attributes analyzed, six define a Challenger rep: offers the customer unique perspectives; has strong communication skills; knows the customer’s value drivers; knows the economic drivers of the customer’s business; is comfortable discussing money; can push the customer.

These attributes reflect three core abilities that define Challengers and form the fundamental activities of the Challenger Selling Model:
1. **Teaching**: with their unique perspective on the customer’s business and strong communication skills, Challengers teach for differentiation—setting themselves apart from the competition—during the sales conversation.
2. **Tailoring**: because they understand the customer’s economic and value drivers, they tailor for resonance, delivering the right message to the right person.
3. **Taking control**: they take control of the sale because they are comfortable discussing money and pushing the customer.

Nearly 40% uses all high performers as its denominator; it is not the percentage of Challengers who succeed. The 44 examined attributes, six selected characteristics, and three abilities describe different levels of the model.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-da46c738cc5006b7:end -->

<a id="b-d9e1f03d82822bc1"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-63c34f0d4cc5"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-29c1555e9e92"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-716a2b6acf10"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-1c45f50064bf"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-d9e1f03d82822bc1:start -->
### The teaching approach: challenging assumptions instead of investigating
In typical solutions sales training, reps are taught to be investigators: to question customers and learn what matters most to them so they can offer solutions. The Challenger approach, by contrast, is to teach rather than investigate.

Effective teaching often means providing a key insight that challenges the customer’s assumptions—revealing a problem the customer did not know they had, or highlighting shortcomings of other approaches. The desired reaction is “I never thought of it that way before,” not “I totally agree,” which signals agreement but not novel insight.

It is critical to connect the key insight to your company’s strengths: the problem you highlight should be one that your company is uniquely suited to solve, better than any competitor. Otherwise, the customer will take your insight and look for other suppliers, and you will have provided free consulting without generating a sale.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-d9e1f03d82822bc1:end -->

<a id="b-cfd45459f030afb8"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-39adde54d94c"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-05c4b551a57d"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-cfd45459f030afb8:start -->
### Six-step structure of an effective teaching conversation
An effective teaching conversation follows six steps:
1. **The warm-up**: Present your assessment of the key issues facing the customer, based on what you have seen at similar companies, and get the customer’s reaction.
2. **Reframing**: Offer a new insight that connects those issues to a bigger problem or opportunity. Don’t go into detail—just give the headline to pique the customer’s curiosity.
3. **Rational drowning**: Present data to build the business case for why the reframe deserves consideration. Subject the customer to “rational drowning”—that is, lay out the rationale for a new approach in a way that makes her uncomfortable with her current approach and therefore open to change.
4. **Emotional impact**: Ensure the customer connects emotionally with the issue. Tell a story about another company that thought the same way, failed to act, and suffered as a result.
5. **A new way**: Review the capabilities the customer needs to solve the problem. Show how much better her life would be if she acted differently. She must accept the solution before she will buy your solution.
6. **Your solution**: Demonstrate that your company’s solution is the answer. Explain specifically how your company is best positioned to deliver the solution she has agreed to.

The “rational drowning” and emotional stages work only if the evidence and consequences fit this customer. Offer the reframing for examination, check the buyer’s response, and allow disagreement. A striking calculation is not a substitute for valid assumptions, and accepting a new method must precede the claim that your company is the right supplier.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-cfd45459f030afb8:end -->

<a id="b-05025ab07eac7a09"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-7d854f73f443"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-c5f5b48c608e"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-79a34bd87f93"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-fe0cc8e26df3"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-1db1859220c1"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-05025ab07eac7a09:start -->
### Tailoring the Message to Each Stakeholder

The way to build the broad consensus needed to win a deal is to tailor the teaching message so that it resonates and sticks with each stakeholder. To tailor a message to a particular stakeholder, the rep needs to understand:
- The stakeholder’s specific business priorities
- The outcomes the person cares most about
- The results they have to deliver (how their performance is measured)
- The economic drivers affecting those outcomes

For example, a rep talking with the head of marketing tailors the message to her priorities, then adjusts it for the head of IT, who has a very different set of priorities.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-05025ab07eac7a09:end -->

<a id="b-37c0817dc5378ce4"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-3b74d5e4b2d8"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-dd88af0e7f91"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-ee4d3814f43e"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-39755b99ad39"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-848bb00d0de0"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-37c0817dc5378ce4:start -->
### Taking control: assertiveness without aggression
Being assertive, or taking control, does not mean being aggressive or irritating; it means the rep stands firm when the customer pushes back.

Challenger reps assert themselves in two ways:
- They control the discussion of pricing and money generally. Rather than giving in to a request for a 10% discount, they refocus the conversation on the value of the offering instead of price.
- They challenge the customer’s thinking and pressure the customer to reach a decision more quickly, countering the inertia that can stall decisions indefinitely. To address reluctance and risk aversion, the Challenger moves customers out of their comfort zone by presenting things from a different perspective.

Just as you cannot be an effective teacher without pushing your students, you cannot teach customers without pushing them to think and act differently. Reps take the lead with a specific end in mind.

Taking control means making a clear value case and proposing a reasonable next step, not overriding refusal. If the diagnosis, economics, or authority needed to proceed is absent, more pressure is not a remedy.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-37c0817dc5378ce4:end -->

<a id="b-6052cc1c195088ec"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-4f69dd610a57"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-00d99e8feb71"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-374feac14348"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-a1a7257ed57d"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-f2b57e49fa42"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-54ed31469592"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-2768b4167702"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-32e5ff16eacb"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-6052cc1c195088ec:start -->
### Organizational Support for the Challenger Sale Model

For the Challenger Sale Model to succeed, reps need two kinds of organizational support:

#### Research and Marketing Expertise

A Challenger sales force needs support from the sales, marketing, research, finance, and human resources departments. These departments must assemble, analyze, frame, and package business intelligence, data, and marketing research into effective teaching pitches—new business insights—that reps can present to customers. The pitches must be compelling, replicable, and adjustable so they resonate with each customer stakeholder. While taking control of the sales conversation is an individual skill, reps need the right information and tools from their organization to take control effectively.

#### Sales Manager Excellence

Frontline sales managers are the key to transforming an average sales force into a Challenger sales force. The most important capabilities for a Challenger manager are coaching skills and sales innovation.
- **Coaching**: Research shows that effective coaching significantly boosts the performance of average reps. Sales coaching is an ongoing series of interactions between a frontline sales manager and a rep, designed to diagnose, correct, and reinforce selling skills and behaviors. Coaching differs from training, which is for sharing knowledge; coaching is for acting on knowledge.
- **Sales innovation**: Sales innovation is the key to fully realizing the potential of the Challenger Sales Model. It means finding new ways to solve problems blocking deals and innovating new ways to position an offer. Sales innovation involves:
  - **Investigating**: Managers work with the rep to understand the customer’s decision-making process and identify where a deal is bogged down and how to get it moving.
  - **Creating**: Innovative managers create solutions at the deal level—for instance, shifting risk from the customer to the supplier in exchange for a longer-term contract.
  - **Sharing**: Innovative managers share best practices and pass on new ideas and solutions to the rest of the team.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-6052cc1c195088ec:end -->

<a id="b-b92369d473d2aed1"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-604759a975ba"></a>
<a id="u-the-challenger-sale-cadefa3152d8"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-ec1b9106c8f7"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-18e261faad82"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-b92369d473d2aed1:start -->
**Front-line leadership and the urgency of action**

Ries and Trout’s positioning advice and Dixon and Adamson’s Challenger model both call for leaders to understand front-line conditions and act decisively. The local summary of *The Challenger Sale* ends with “Start Now”: change how representatives interact with customers before competitors do. The authors expect useful Challenger conversations to earn more time with buyers, invitations to return, and commitments to act, instead of the familiar brush-off, “We’ll get back to you.”
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b92369d473d2aed1:end -->

<a id="theme-sales-system"></a>

## Make the sales system repeatable without mistaking measures for guarantees

<a id="b-3e7fe7e84059d89d"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-d9254d844eca"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-f4017d5bd1e3"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-1b69838a41bf"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-8f388999abde"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-275570565a9e"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-79b755effa54"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-0b6b2bd2c049"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-fb22b481dd47"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-3e7fe7e84059d89d:start -->
### Marketing-sales alignment and one explicit lead handoff
In *The Sales Acceleration Formula*, marketing nurtures leads with useful content until their behavior shows that they are ready to consider a purchase—for example, by requesting detailed product information or a demonstration. The Buyer Persona/Buyer Journey model helps both departments identify that handoff point, while the sales team uses clear rules to decide which prospects warrant continued engagement.

Mike Volpe, HubSpot’s chief marketing officer in the historical account, recommends a Service Level Agreement (SLA) so marketing and sales share one definition of a qualified lead and commit to lead quality. The SLA also defines sales’s obligation after handoff: make rapid initial contact, attempt follow-up repeatedly, and use tracking systems to verify those commitments and adjust tactics to the prospect’s level of engagement. Beyond the handoff, the two teams sustain conversion by creating compelling content together, targeting distinct market segments, and maintaining high standards of quality.

Shortform’s limitation: Aligning marketing and sales can create conflicts over resource allocation and strategic priorities.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-3e7fe7e84059d89d:end -->

<a id="b-c61510d6d36795aa"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-4ea6e242f29e"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-4e7a21cf705f"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-0eeb81787192"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-e9974e36b2b4"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-c61510d6d36795aa:start -->
### Identifying and Recruiting High-Performing Sales Talent

Despite the common misconception that aggressive tactics win in sales, it is actually knowledgeable, helpful people who thrive. Top performers rely on intelligence and a willingness to assist others to succeed. Ongoing regression analyses, which account for shifts in team dynamics, product development, changing consumer preferences, and competitive market factors, reinforce this finding.

The ideal sales profile varies by organization, however: strategies that work well in one company may not translate to another because of differences in customer base and business environment. HubSpot’s approach to attracting sales talent, for example, may not be directly transferable.

Regression analysis examines relationships between variables. In this use, it can identify organization-specific associations between attributes and performance, including the context of teams, products, preferences, and markets; it does not prove that selecting a trait causes success. Intelligence and helpfulness are hypotheses to test against the job, not universal hiring guarantees.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c61510d6d36795aa:end -->

<a id="b-b9a1980b1df9e1c5"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-62426ce767e7"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-74d665cbe8cf"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-c4f6f41301e8"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-5ba813203b64"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-be69c4e60c89"></a>
<a id="b-3f4d2c73f68227e4"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-2119ac54282d"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-b9a1980b1df9e1c5:start -->
### Analytics-based sales hiring and structured assessment

Hiring and onboarding salespeople effectively requires analytics and metrics to identify the best candidates and ensure a consistent, efficient onboarding experience.

When evaluating candidates, organizations should measure traits that correspond to those of their most successful employees, rather than relying solely on digital career profiles. HubSpot, for instance, assessed applicant potential partly by the reputation of the institutions they graduated from, viewing it as a proxy for cognitive ability—an attribute frequently linked to sales success. A strong LinkedIn presence, with professional photos and credible endorsements, was also seen as a positive signal. Candidates are screened for coachability, curiosity, intelligence, work ethic, and prior success using tools such as the Interview Scorecard, which rates candidates on a 1-to-10 scale across these characteristics. Integrating real-life simulation exercises into a comprehensive hiring strategy can further improve its reliability.

The five traits are coachability, curiosity, intelligence, work ethic, and prior success. Here work ethic means diligence and work commitment; coachability means taking feedback and applying it. School reputation and a polished LinkedIn profile are imperfect proxies, not direct measures of ability. Use the scorecard and simulations to gather comparable job-relevant evidence, while checking for bias and recognizing the time and realism limits of simulations.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-b9a1980b1df9e1c5:end -->

<!-- atlas:block-content b-3f4d2c73f68227e4:start -->
Shortform’s limitation: Analytics and metrics may not capture the full range of a candidate’s potential, such as interpersonal skills and cultural fit, which can be equally critical in sales. Intelligence and helpfulness matter, but different sales environments may also demand traits like resilience, adaptability, and the ability to handle rejection. The reputation of an educational institution is not necessarily a reliable predictor of sales success, and screening for traits such as coachability and curiosity can be subjective and introduce bias without objective measures. Real-life hiring simulations can be useful but are time-consuming and may not fully reflect the actual job environment.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-3f4d2c73f68227e4:end -->

<a id="b-7c536627a9b2cced"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-57b669b7b5a8"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-28c5fff35e42"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-c148790a4220"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-dd4f5bcce597"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-e755d0a852d2"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-7c536627a9b2cced:start -->
### Train along the buyer’s path, then demonstrate the skill
Roberge organizes training around the buyer’s journey, the stages of the sales process, and deal evaluation. A consistent sequence helps representatives connect a conversation to the decision the buyer is making. Certification can assess understanding; observed practice is still needed to assess performance.

Two qualification frameworks ask different questions. **BANT** means Budget, Authority, Need, and Timeline: can this organization purchase, who decides, what is needed, and when? **GPCT** means Goals, Plans, Challenges, and Timelines: what is the buyer trying to accomplish, what is already planned, what stands in the way, and when does it matter? The guide presents HubSpot’s move toward GPCT as a shift toward the buyer’s perspective, not proof that budget and authority no longer matter or that BANT is obsolete everywhere.

Evaluate both conceptual understanding and practical demonstrations at the relevant sales stages, refining the method to the company’s goals and requirements. Uniform training can miss different learning styles, territories, and products; passing a knowledge test does not guarantee effective work in the field.

Shortform’s limitation: Overly standardized sales training may not accommodate individual learning styles or the needs of different territories or products. Certifications validate knowledge but do not always translate to practical on-the-ground sales skills.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-7c536627a9b2cced:end -->

<a id="b-62118a158f01e794"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-2af35376c1cd"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-14f33c4ee2e4"></a>
<a id="b-fb9d6e3e5f23752c"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-e4a594e7fb15"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-15c0e39ddc4a"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-a8fb4e1e224a"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-53cf59253691"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-085b2b37717a"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-fb9d6e3e5f23752c:start -->
### Align compensation with the stage of the business
Roberge describes changing HubSpot’s sales incentives as its priorities changed: an early “hunting plan” emphasized acquiring customers; later plans gave more attention to retention and initial payment terms. The local summary calls the latter “extending initial payment timelines,” but does not explain the cash-flow direction clearly enough to prescribe delayed collection. Keep the concrete design question: which behavior does the payment rule reward, and how does it affect retention and cash received?

Discuss the incentive openly, apply it fairly and consistently, and evaluate the outcomes it actually produces. Company-goal alignment alone is insufficient if a plan encourages mis-selling, internal competition, or a customer commitment that sales cannot fulfill.

Shortform’s limitation: Compensation plans too tightly tied to company goals can inadvertently encourage unethical sales practices or excessive internal competition.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fb9d6e3e5f23752c:end -->

<a id="b-3af6cee177453979"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-ad120f2d0827"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-71690979abdb"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-16d33b1ea4d7"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-553ed019e474"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-3af6cee177453979:start -->
### Short-term sales contests for targeted behavioral change

Sales contests add a dynamic layer to commission structures by driving immediate behavioral shifts. According to *The Sales Acceleration Formula*, contests are carefully designed to address specific challenges, such as boosting sales volume or improving the accuracy of demand forecasting. Contests should foster unity and strengthen team bonds by offering rewards that the whole group can enjoy together. Regular progress updates and flexible contest duration can sustain engagement; subsequent behavior and customer outcomes show whether the contest helped. Consistent use of competitive activities and training, the book notes, improved sales forecasting precision and sales funnel management. Together, compensation and contests shape behaviors aligned with company goals; combining them with data-driven coaching creates a robust framework for developing sales management skills and driving team success.

Shortform’s limitation: Poorly designed sales contests may prioritize short-term gains over long-term customer relationships and team cohesion.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-3af6cee177453979:end -->

<a id="b-9143fbc572276059"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-7ba864b767b6"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-9073eeb56a2f"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-72adc2d4b687"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-3720191af045"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-88106680865d"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-d57d476131b0"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-7bdb9a248f37"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-62118a158f01e794:start -->
### Data-driven sales coaching and skill development

Effective sales leadership substantially improves team performance. Future sales managers are trained in a detailed curriculum covering core skills such as coaching, giving feedback, and managing conflict, with the goal of applying these skills effectively in daily operations.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-62118a158f01e794:end -->

<!-- atlas:block-content b-9143fbc572276059:start -->
Exceptional sales managers distinguish themselves by identifying the single skill that, if improved, would most boost a salesperson’s results, and then tailoring their coaching to develop that specific skill. Managers use analytical methods to pinpoint areas for improvement, examining the relationship between the number of leads pursued and the rate at which those leads convert to meaningful connections and then to presentations. Before offering advice, managers should hold conversations to understand the salesperson’s perspective. Action plans may include specific steps such as pipeline reviews, setting daily activity targets, or conducting role-play practice sessions to reinforce and internalize new competencies.

Evaluating coaching effectiveness is essential to ensuring it has a meaningful impact. Sales managers can assess the success of their approaches by tracking changes in a salesperson’s funnel metrics over several months, or by adjusting their coaching techniques based on what those measurements reveal. Reviewing call recordings and analyzing the root causes of missed opportunities also helps identify skill gaps and develop improved guidance strategies.

Shortform’s limitation: Sales management strategies that overemphasize data and metrics risk neglecting the human element essential to managing and motivating teams. Personalized coaching assumes managers have the time and resources for individualized attention, which may not always be true.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-9143fbc572276059:end -->

<a id="b-c5c5cf555e0de33b"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-9da728d32269"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-978ef104802e"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-c5c5cf555e0de33b:start -->
**Sales Team Management and Leadership**


Sales expert Mike Weinberg believes that the problem in most struggling sales teams is an ineffective sales leader, not the team members. Thus, if a sales manager can learn how to lead their team effectively, overall team performance will improve. Weinberg’s techniques for successfully managing a sales team include setting goals that push people to excel, using shadowing to identify team weaknesses, and training people to make good sales calls. He also views wise time management as a crucial factor in managerial effectiveness. Shortform makes the comparison between Weinberg and other sales and management experts, such as Peter Drucker, Jeffrey Gitomer, and Grant Cardone.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-c5c5cf555e0de33b:end -->

<a id="b-33047c0e255bd795"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-a16449eb74fe"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-bb8b41ad39c9"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-dce31f6151cb"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-76fc4ae9c07d"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-40d5fb1f94da"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-3192720b86cc"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-33047c0e255bd795:start -->
### Sales technology for workflow acceleration and customer insight

In a constantly evolving sales environment, embracing innovative technologies and creative strategies is essential for improving processes and lifting results. Organizations are transforming their sales operations by adopting technology and systematically pursuing new approaches and trial initiatives.

Modern sales tools accelerate transaction workflows by enhancing both the customer experience and sales professional efficiency. Sales teams use technology to boost productivity and gain valuable insight into prospects’ inclinations and circumstances, refining the customer experience across the buying journey. The HubSpot sales team uses sophisticated tools to optimize every stage of the sales process, including evaluating prospects’ social engagement and blog impact. Reps also receive real-time insights into activities such as website visits and email interactions, allowing them to craft more effective engagement strategies. Technological advances have improved team efficiency by enabling tailored approaches to both inbound and outbound prospect communication.

Shortform’s limitation: Sales technology can improve efficiency but may also foster over-reliance on tools at the expense of fundamental sales skills.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-33047c0e255bd795:end -->

<a id="b-fe4cc27bf8282df4"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-f9852b85372b"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-a3427929360a"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-492b2ada0587"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe4cc27bf8282df4:start -->
### Sales technology: less manual work, checkable records
Automation can reduce manual documentation and some transcription errors. The guide describes a sidebar showing a prospect company’s scope, financial position, and key executives, with a simple action to import those details into the CRM. Tools can also help establish prospect connections and record sales activity, giving time-constrained representatives more time for the conversation.

Reporting accuracy still depends on the underlying sources, field definitions, completeness of activity records, and checks against what happened. Automation can propagate bad data or a misunderstood field as quickly as good data. Even a complete structured report can omit nuances a human observer would recognize. Use the tools to improve visibility and reduce administrative work while retaining those checks and interpretation.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-fe4cc27bf8282df4:end -->

<a id="b-5de4929f5b073883"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-715abbcca7b2"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-75701ec8d39a"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-04e3ae4aa336"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-3c295abb4447"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-2c0820984ddf"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-9475c2e70679"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-feaa7fbde98b"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-ab625152c543"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-7f9a139c4497"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-733025eddc31"></a>
<a id="u-the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing-a192946ad5f2"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-5de4929f5b073883:start -->
### Disciplined experimentation culture and strategic scaling

Sustained progress in sales depends on building a culture of disciplined, ongoing experimentation. Commercial organizations should embed development and advancement into their culture to stay ahead, using a systematic cycle of consistently designing, applying, and evaluating new sales strategies. A reliable routine for this cycle is critical. HubSpot cultivated a grassroots innovation culture that allowed ideas to be conceived, tested, and, if they warranted substantial investment, potentially presented to a senior experiment panel. The VAR (Value-Added Reseller) program was carefully structured with clear goals, achievement benchmarks, and a defined progression path.

Successful experiments can drive major strategic shifts. For example, an innovative HubSpot salesperson launched a pilot that grew into an entirely new sales channel described in the historical account as staffed by a dedicated team of one hundred people. Its effectiveness and strategic value were assessed using metrics such as customer lifetime value relative to customer acquisition cost, and the time required to recoup the initial investment. Another example is the company’s shift from the BANT lead-qualification framework to the GPCT methodology, which the account associates with better lead conversion rates, greater efficiency, and more effective fulfillment of customer needs. Drawing on the results of successful trials can fuel strategic improvements that accelerate business growth. In sales, the continuous advancement of methods is driven not only by technology and methodical trials but also by fostering a culture where innovation is not just supported—it is a standard of business operation. The core aim is to use technological progress and knowledge from strategic experiments to help the sales team improve results that can be tested.

A VAR is a value-added reseller: an external partner that resells the company’s products or services, supported by explicit goals, benchmarks, and a development path. The reported hundred-person channel is a historical scale marker. CLV-to-acquisition-cost and payback measurements help assess a pilot; a favorable pilot still needs evidence of sustainable economics and scalable execution. A change in conversion alongside GPCT adoption alone cannot isolate its causal effect.

Shortform’s limitation: A culture of constant experimentation can cause instability and confusion if not managed well. Finally, strategic shifts based on successful experiments must be scalable and sustainable to deliver long-term value.
<!-- atlas:block-content b-5de4929f5b073883:end -->

<a id="b-387fd1c11f4c2818"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-f306df05c819"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-094d4981421c"></a>
<a id="u-the-sales-acceleration-formula-5ce1a5985108"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-387fd1c11f4c2818:start -->
### Lead Generation and Prospecting Methods

Generating new business is vital to a company’s success and to a sales career, yet many sales reps are intimidated by having to make cold calls—first-time calls to potential customers to ask for their business—and make only half-hearted attempts to win new accounts, or do not try at all. In *New Sales. Simplified.*, veteran salesman and sales coach Mike Weinberg demystifies prospecting for both veterans and rookies. He offers a three-part method for generating new business: strategically select prospects to pursue, create effective sales tools, and plan and execute. To generate leads, he explains how to create a list of likely prospects using online research and referrals; for instance, he recommends using LinkedIn to research an industry, identify leads by checking out your best customers’ LinkedIn contacts, initiate relationships, and share useful information. He also emphasizes meticulously planning your approach to the prospect, creating a well-crafted “sales story” and a scripted sales presentation. With these tools, Weinberg argues, anyone can become a sales hunter.

*References: [New Sales. Simplified.](https://www.shortform.com/app/book/new-sales-simplified/part-2)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-387fd1c11f4c2818:end -->

<a id="b-3c40059b4f319070"></a>
<a id="u-the-1-page-marketing-plan-e1f3decb5ed9"></a>

<!-- atlas:block-content b-3c40059b4f319070:start -->
**Common Small Business Marketing Mistakes**


Shortform editorial context adds that a Forbes article lists the absence of a marketing plan among the 10 most common small business marketing mistakes, alongside lacking a website, prioritizing social media marketing over website development, failing to customize marketing strategy, and ignoring competitors’ marketing strategies.

*References: [10 most common small business marketing mistakes](https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnrampton/2015/09/24/the-10-most-common-small-business-marketing-mistakes/?sh=e87a9271f8c4)*
<!-- atlas:block-content b-3c40059b4f319070:end -->

<a id="connections"></a>

## Continue the question

- [From Problem to Market](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/articles/startup-product-market/en/)
- [Writing, Conversation, and Influence](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/articles/communication-writing/en/)
- [Thinking Clearly in a Noisy World](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/articles/decisions-systems/en/)

## The ten local guides

- [This Is Marketing](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/this-is-marketing/)
- [How Brands Grow](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/how-brands-grow/)
- [The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/the-22-immutable-laws-of-marketing/)
- [The 1-Page Marketing Plan](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/the-1-page-marketing-plan/)
- [Breakthrough Advertising](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/breakthrough-advertising/)
- [Building a StoryBrand](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/building-a-storybrand/)
- [SPIN Selling](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/spin-selling/)
- [The Challenger Sale](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/the-challenger-sale/)
- [To Sell Is Human](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/to-sell-is-human/)
- [The Sales Acceleration Formula](https://short.zaynjarvis.com/books/the-sales-acceleration-formula/)